%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : DAT335_2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:21:14 PM UTC 2026
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 0.12s 0.45s
% Output : Saturation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_7ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_15ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tcf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: '$ki_world',X2] :
( ~ teach('$ki_local_world',X2,psych)
| ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
| teach(X1,X2,cs) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_12,plain,
! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
| teach(X1,sue,psych) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_13,plain,
! [X1: '$ki_world'] : '$ki_accessible'(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_14,plain,
! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
| teach(X1,mary,psych) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
| teach(X1,sue,cs) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
| teach(X1,mary,cs) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_14]),c_0_13])]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_17,plain,
! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
| teach(X1,esk2_1(X1),cs) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_18,plain,
! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
( ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
| teach(X1,john,math) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : DAT335_2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:33:58 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3167805 completed with status 1
% 0.12/0.45 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.45 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3167809 completed with status 1
% 0.12/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.45 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.45
% 0.12/0.45 % No proof found!
% 0.12/0.45 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.12/0.45 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 16
% 0.12/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Initial clauses : 20
% 0.12/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 14
% 0.12/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.12/0.45 % Processed clauses : 8
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.12/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Generated clauses : 2
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.12/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Paramodulations : 2
% 0.12/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 8
% 0.12/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.12/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.12/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 651
% 0.12/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 68
% 0.12/0.45
% 0.12/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.45 % User time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.45 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.12/0.45
% 0.12/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.45 % User time : 0.010 s
% 0.12/0.45 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.12/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------