↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : DAT338^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v9.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 08:45:31 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.79s 1.43s
% Output   : Refutation 1.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  29 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   89 (  27 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  247 (   5   ~;   0   |;   0   &; 224   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    4 (   3 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   15 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (   8  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (  11   ^;  17   !;   0   ?;  28   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_6,type,
    elem: $tType ).

thf(type_def_7,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(type_def_8,type,
    list: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    isPer: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    elem: $tType ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    elemStar: elem > elem > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    natStar: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    zero: nat ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    suc: nat > nat ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    plus: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    list: $tType ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    listStar: nat > list > list > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    nil: list ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    cons: nat > elem > list > list ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    app: nat > nat > list > list > list ).

thf(func_def_30,type,
    ph1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f256,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f255]) ).

thf(f255,plain,
    $true = $false,
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f254,f94]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( ( listStar @ zero @ ( app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil ) @ nil )
    = $false ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f84]) ).

thf(f84,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( listStar @ zero @ ( app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil ) @ nil ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f68,f83]) ).

thf(f83,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( plus @ zero @ X1 )
      = X1 ),
    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f82]) ).

thf(f82,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( plus @ zero @ X1 )
        = X1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f81]) ).

thf(f81,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ( ( plus @ zero @ Y0 )
            = Y0 )
        @ X1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f69]) ).

thf(f69,plain,
    ( ( !! @ nat
      @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
          ( ( plus @ zero @ Y0 )
          = Y0 ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f41]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ( !! @ nat
      @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
          ( ( plus @ zero @ Y0 )
          = Y0 ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f40]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ! [X0: nat] :
      ( ( plus @ zero @ X0 )
      = X0 ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,axiom,
    ! [X6: nat] :
      ( ( plus @ zero @ X6 )
      = X6 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xVPkMCFDQR/DTF2THF_12734.p',ax1) ).

thf(f68,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( listStar @ ( plus @ zero @ zero ) @ ( app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil ) @ nil ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f39]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( listStar @ ( plus @ zero @ zero ) @ ( app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil ) @ nil ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f38]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ~ ( listStar @ ( plus @ zero @ zero ) @ ( app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil ) @ nil ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( listStar @ ( plus @ zero @ zero ) @ ( app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil ) @ nil ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,conjecture,
    listStar @ ( plus @ zero @ zero ) @ ( app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil ) @ nil,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xVPkMCFDQR/DTF2THF_12734.p',list_app_nil_base) ).

thf(f254,plain,
    ( ( listStar @ zero @ ( app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil ) @ nil )
    = $true ),
    inference(boolean_simplification,[status(thm)],[f252]) ).

thf(f252,plain,
    ( ( $true
     => ( listStar @ zero @ ( app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil ) @ nil ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f242,f60]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( ( listStar @ zero @ nil @ nil )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f53]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ( ( listStar @ zero @ nil @ nil )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f52]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    listStar @ zero @ nil @ nil,
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,axiom,
    listStar @ zero @ nil @ nil,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xVPkMCFDQR/DTF2THF_12734.p',nil_tp_ax) ).

thf(f242,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X1: list] :
      ( ( ( listStar @ X2 @ X1 @ X1 )
       => ( listStar @ X2 @ ( app @ zero @ X2 @ nil @ X1 ) @ X1 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f238,f83]) ).

thf(f238,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X1: list] :
      ( ( ( listStar @ X2 @ X1 @ X1 )
       => ( listStar @ ( plus @ zero @ X2 ) @ ( app @ zero @ X2 @ nil @ X1 ) @ X1 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f236]) ).

thf(f236,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X1: list] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ( ( listStar @ Y0 @ X1 @ X1 )
           => ( listStar @ ( plus @ zero @ Y0 ) @ ( app @ zero @ Y0 @ nil @ X1 ) @ X1 ) )
        @ X2 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f229]) ).

thf(f229,plain,
    ! [X1: list] :
      ( ( !! @ nat
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ( ( listStar @ Y0 @ X1 @ X1 )
           => ( listStar @ ( plus @ zero @ Y0 ) @ ( app @ zero @ Y0 @ nil @ X1 ) @ X1 ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f228]) ).

thf(f228,plain,
    ! [X1: list] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: list] :
            ( !! @ nat
            @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                ( ( listStar @ Y1 @ Y0 @ Y0 )
               => ( listStar @ ( plus @ zero @ Y1 ) @ ( app @ zero @ Y1 @ nil @ Y0 ) @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ X1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f64]) ).

thf(f64,plain,
    ( ( !! @ list
      @ ^ [Y0: list] :
          ( !! @ nat
          @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
              ( ( listStar @ Y1 @ Y0 @ Y0 )
             => ( listStar @ ( plus @ zero @ Y1 ) @ ( app @ zero @ Y1 @ nil @ Y0 ) @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( !! @ list
      @ ^ [Y0: list] :
          ( !! @ nat
          @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
              ( ( listStar @ Y1 @ Y0 @ Y0 )
             => ( listStar @ ( plus @ zero @ Y1 ) @ ( app @ zero @ Y1 @ nil @ Y0 ) @ Y0 ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: list] :
      ( ( listStar @ X0 @ X1 @ X1 )
     => ( listStar @ ( plus @ zero @ X0 ) @ ( app @ zero @ X0 @ nil @ X1 ) @ X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,axiom,
    ! [X6: nat,X2: list] :
      ( ( listStar @ X6 @ X2 @ X2 )
     => ( listStar @ ( plus @ zero @ X6 ) @ ( app @ zero @ X6 @ nil @ X2 ) @ X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xVPkMCFDQR/DTF2THF_12734.p',ax3) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : DAT338^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v9.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.35  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 06:15:36 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.35  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.28/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.28/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.28/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.46  % File     : DAT338^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v9.2.0.
% 0.28/0.46  % Domain   : Data Structures
% 0.28/0.46  % Problem  : Nil is a right-neutral element of app, base case
% 0.28/0.46  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.28/0.46  % English  : Nil is a right-neutral element of app. The proof is by induction
% 0.28/0.46  %            with a separate problem file for the base and step case as well as
% 0.28/0.46  %            the correct instantiation of the induction axiom for lists. The 
% 0.28/0.46  %            main file uses the conjectures of the other files as lemmas in
% 0.28/0.46  %            order to prove the final result. To simplify proof search, the
% 0.28/0.46  %            lemmas in the problem file for the induction step have been
% 0.28/0.46  %            preselected.
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  % Refs     : [RRB23] Rothgang et al. (2023), Theorem Proving in Dependently
% 0.28/0.46  %          : [Rot25] Rothgang (2025), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.28/0.46  %          : [RK+25] Ranalter et al. (2025), The Dependently Typed Higher-O
% 0.28/0.46  % Source   : [Rot25]
% 0.28/0.46  % Names    : ListAppNil/list-app-nil-base.p [Rot25]
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.28/0.46  % Rating   : ? v9.2.0
% 0.28/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   7 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :    9 (   9 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   0 avg)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Number of connectives :   80 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  70   @)
% 0.28/0.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Number of type decls  :    9 (   0 !>P;   3 !>D)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :   10 (  10   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    8 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
% 0.28/0.46  %            Number of variables   :   27 (   0   ^;  23   !;   0   ?;  27   :)
% 0.28/0.46  %                                         (   4  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)
% 0.28/0.46  % SPC      : DH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  % Comments :
% 0.28/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.46  thf(elem_type,type,
% 0.28/0.46      elem: $tType ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(nat_type,type,
% 0.28/0.46      nat: $tType ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(zero_type,type,
% 0.28/0.46      zero: nat ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(suc_type,type,
% 0.28/0.46      suc: nat > nat ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(plus_type,type,
% 0.28/0.46      plus: nat > nat > nat ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(list_type,type,
% 0.28/0.46      list: nat > $tType ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(nil_type,type,
% 0.28/0.46      nil: list @ zero ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(cons_type,type,
% 0.28/0.46      cons: 
% 0.28/0.46        !>[N: nat] : ( elem > ( list @ N ) > ( list @ ( suc @ N ) ) ) ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(app_type,type,
% 0.28/0.46      app: 
% 0.28/0.46        !>[N: nat,M: nat] : ( ( list @ N ) > ( list @ M ) > ( list @ ( plus @ N @ M ) ) ) ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(peano1,axiom,
% 0.28/0.46      ! [N: nat] :
% 0.28/0.46        ( ( suc @ N )
% 0.28/0.46       != zero ) ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(peano2,axiom,
% 0.28/0.46      ! [N: nat,M: nat] :
% 0.28/0.46        ( ( N != M )
% 0.28/0.46       => ( ( suc @ N )
% 0.28/0.46         != ( suc @ M ) ) ) ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(peano3,axiom,
% 0.28/0.46      ! [P: nat > $o] :
% 0.28/0.46        ( ( P @ zero )
% 0.28/0.46       => ( ! [M: nat] :
% 0.28/0.46              ( ( P @ M )
% 0.28/0.46             => ( P @ ( suc @ M ) ) )
% 0.28/0.46         => ! [N: nat] : ( P @ N ) ) ) ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(list_induct,axiom,
% 0.28/0.46      ! [P: !>[N: nat] : ( ( list @ N ) > $o )] :
% 0.28/0.46        ( ( P @ zero @ nil )
% 0.28/0.46       => ( ! [M: nat,X: elem,Y: list @ M] :
% 0.28/0.46              ( ( P @ M @ Y )
% 0.28/0.46             => ( P @ ( suc @ M ) @ ( cons @ M @ X @ Y ) ) )
% 0.28/0.46         => ! [N: nat,X: list @ N] : ( P @ N @ X ) ) ) ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(ax1,axiom,
% 0.28/0.46      ! [N: nat] :
% 0.28/0.46        ( ( plus @ zero @ N )
% 0.28/0.46        = N ) ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(ax2,axiom,
% 0.28/0.46      ! [N: nat,M: nat] :
% 0.28/0.46        ( ( plus @ ( suc @ N ) @ M )
% 0.28/0.46        = ( suc @ ( plus @ N @ M ) ) ) ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(ax3,axiom,
% 0.28/0.46      ! [N: nat,X: list @ N] :
% 0.28/0.46        ( ( app @ zero @ N @ nil @ X )
% 0.28/0.46        = X ) ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(ax4,axiom,
% 0.28/0.46      ! [N: nat,M: nat,X: elem,Y: list @ N,Z: list @ M] :
% 0.28/0.46        ( ( app @ ( suc @ N ) @ M @ ( cons @ N @ X @ Y ) @ Z )
% 0.28/0.46        = ( cons @ ( plus @ N @ M ) @ X @ ( app @ N @ M @ Y @ Z ) ) ) ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(plus_zero_r,axiom,
% 0.28/0.46      ! [M: nat] :
% 0.28/0.46        ( ( plus @ M @ zero )
% 0.28/0.46        = M ) ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  thf(list_app_nil_base,conjecture,
% 0.28/0.46      ( ( app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil )
% 0.28/0.46      = nil ) ).
% 0.28/0.46  
% 0.28/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.46  ------------------------
% 1.68/1.35  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.68/1.35  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.68/1.35  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 06:15:37 EST 2026
% 1.68/1.35  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.68/1.35  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.68/1.35  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.68/1.35  
% 1.68/1.35  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xVPkMCFDQR/DTF2DTF12734.p
% See solution above
% 1.68/1.35  ------------------------
% 1.68/1.36  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.68/1.36  thf(is_per_type,type,
% 1.68/1.36      isPer: 
% 1.68/1.36        !>[A: $tType] : ( ( A > A > $o ) > $o ) ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(is_per,definition,
% 1.68/1.36      ! [A: $tType,AStar: A > A > $o] :
% 1.68/1.36        ( ( isPer @ A @ AStar )
% 1.68/1.36      <=> ( ! [X: A,Y: A] :
% 1.68/1.36              ( ( AStar @ X @ Y )
% 1.68/1.36             => ( AStar @ Y @ X ) )
% 1.68/1.36          & ! [X: A,Y: A,Z: A] :
% 1.68/1.36              ( ( AStar @ X @ Y )
% 1.68/1.36             => ( ( AStar @ Y @ Z )
% 1.68/1.36               => ( AStar @ X @ Z ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(elem_type,type,
% 1.68/1.36      elem: $tType ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(elemStar,type,
% 1.68/1.36      elemStar: elem > elem > $o ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(elemStar_is_eq,axiom,
% 1.68/1.36      ! [X: elem,Y: elem] :
% 1.68/1.36        ( ( elemStar @ X @ Y )
% 1.68/1.36      <=> ( X = Y ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(nat_type,type,
% 1.68/1.36      nat: $tType ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(natStar,type,
% 1.68/1.36      natStar: nat > nat > $o ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(natStar_is_eq,axiom,
% 1.68/1.36      ! [X: nat,Y: nat] :
% 1.68/1.36        ( ( natStar @ X @ Y )
% 1.68/1.36      <=> ( X = Y ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(zero_type,type,
% 1.68/1.36      zero: nat ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(suc_type,type,
% 1.68/1.36      suc: nat > nat ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(plus_type,type,
% 1.68/1.36      plus: nat > nat > nat ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(list_type,type,
% 1.68/1.36      list: $tType ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(listStar,type,
% 1.68/1.36      listStar: nat > list > list > $o ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf('\'listStar\'_is_per',axiom,
% 1.68/1.36      ! [C: nat] : ( isPer @ list @ ( listStar @ C ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(nil_type,type,
% 1.68/1.36      nil: list ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(nil_tp_ax,axiom,
% 1.68/1.36      listStar @ zero @ nil @ nil ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(cons_type,type,
% 1.68/1.36      cons: nat > elem > list > list ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(cons_tp_ax,axiom,
% 1.68/1.36      ! [N: nat,D: elem,D0: list,D0_prime: list] :
% 1.68/1.36        ( ( listStar @ N @ D0 @ D0_prime )
% 1.68/1.36       => ( listStar @ ( suc @ N ) @ ( cons @ N @ D @ D0 ) @ ( cons @ N @ D @ D0_prime ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(app_type,type,
% 1.68/1.36      app: nat > nat > list > list > list ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(app_tp_ax,axiom,
% 1.68/1.36      ! [N: nat,M: nat,D: list,D_prime: list] :
% 1.68/1.36        ( ( listStar @ N @ D @ D_prime )
% 1.68/1.36       => ! [D0: list,D0_prime: list] :
% 1.68/1.36            ( ( listStar @ M @ D0 @ D0_prime )
% 1.68/1.36           => ( listStar @ ( plus @ N @ M ) @ ( app @ N @ M @ D @ D0 ) @ ( app @ N @ M @ D_prime @ D0_prime ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(peano1,axiom,
% 1.68/1.36      ! [N: nat] :
% 1.68/1.36        ( ( suc @ N )
% 1.68/1.36       != zero ) ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(peano2,axiom,
% 1.68/1.36      ! [N: nat,M: nat] :
% 1.68/1.36        ( ( N != M )
% 1.68/1.36       => ( ( suc @ N )
% 1.68/1.36         != ( suc @ M ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(peano3,axiom,
% 1.68/1.36      ! [P: nat > $o] :
% 1.68/1.36        ( ( P @ zero )
% 1.68/1.36       => ( ! [M: nat] :
% 1.68/1.36              ( ( P @ M )
% 1.68/1.36             => ( P @ ( suc @ M ) ) )
% 1.68/1.36         => ! [N: nat] : ( P @ N ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(list_induct,axiom,
% 1.68/1.36      ! [P: nat > list > $o] :
% 1.68/1.36        ( ! [N: nat,D: list,D_prime: list] :
% 1.68/1.36            ( ( listStar @ N @ D @ D_prime )
% 1.68/1.36           => ( ( P @ N @ D )
% 1.68/1.36              = ( P @ N @ D_prime ) ) )
% 1.68/1.36       => ( ( P @ zero @ nil )
% 1.68/1.36         => ( ! [M: nat,X: elem,Y: list] :
% 1.68/1.36                ( ( listStar @ M @ Y @ Y )
% 1.68/1.36               => ( ( P @ M @ Y )
% 1.68/1.36                 => ( P @ ( suc @ M ) @ ( cons @ M @ X @ Y ) ) ) )
% 1.68/1.36           => ! [N: nat,X: list] :
% 1.68/1.36                ( ( listStar @ N @ X @ X )
% 1.68/1.36               => ( P @ N @ X ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(ax1,axiom,
% 1.68/1.36      ! [N: nat] :
% 1.68/1.36        ( ( plus @ zero @ N )
% 1.68/1.36        = N ) ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(ax2,axiom,
% 1.68/1.36      ! [N: nat,M: nat] :
% 1.68/1.36        ( ( plus @ ( suc @ N ) @ M )
% 1.68/1.36        = ( suc @ ( plus @ N @ M ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(ax3,axiom,
% 1.68/1.36      ! [N: nat,X: list] :
% 1.68/1.36        ( ( listStar @ N @ X @ X )
% 1.68/1.36       => ( listStar @ ( plus @ zero @ N ) @ ( app @ zero @ N @ nil @ X ) @ X ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(ax4,axiom,
% 1.68/1.36      ! [N: nat,M: nat,X: elem,Y: list,Z: list] :
% 1.68/1.36        ( ( listStar @ N @ Y @ Y )
% 1.68/1.36       => ( ( listStar @ M @ Z @ Z )
% 1.68/1.36         => ( listStar @ ( plus @ ( suc @ N ) @ M ) @ ( app @ ( suc @ N ) @ M @ ( cons @ N @ X @ Y ) @ Z ) @ ( cons @ ( plus @ N @ M ) @ X @ ( app @ N @ M @ Y @ Z ) ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(plus_zero_r,axiom,
% 1.68/1.36      ! [M: nat] :
% 1.68/1.36        ( ( plus @ M @ zero )
% 1.68/1.36        = M ) ).
% 1.68/1.36  
% 1.68/1.36  thf(list_app_nil_base,conjecture,
% 1.68/1.36      listStar @ ( plus @ zero @ zero ) @ ( app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil ) @ nil ).
% 1.68/1.36  ------------------------
% 1.68/1.37  % (13062)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.68/1.37  % (13060)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.68/1.38  % (13061)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.68/1.38  % (13063)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.68/1.38  % (13064)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.68/1.38  % (13065)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 1.68/1.38  % (13066)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 1.68/1.38  % (13063)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.68/1.38  % (13063)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.38  % (13063)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.68/1.38  % (13063)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.68/1.38  % (13063)Termination phase: shuffling
% 1.68/1.38  
% 1.68/1.38  % (13063)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 1.68/1.38  % (13063)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.68/1.38  % (13063)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.68/1.38  % (13063)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.38  % (13063)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.38  % (13064)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.68/1.38  % (13064)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.38  % (13064)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.68/1.38  % (13064)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.68/1.38  % (13064)Termination phase: shuffling
% 1.68/1.38  
% 1.68/1.38  % (13064)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 1.68/1.38  % (13064)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.68/1.38  % (13064)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.68/1.38  % (13064)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.38  % (13064)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.38  % (13061)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.68/1.38  % (13061)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.38  % (13061)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.68/1.38  % (13061)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.68/1.38  % (13061)Termination phase: shuffling
% 1.68/1.38  
% 1.68/1.38  % (13061)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 1.68/1.38  % (13061)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.68/1.38  % (13061)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.68/1.38  % (13061)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.38  % (13061)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.38  % (13062)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.68/1.38  % (13062)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.38  % (13062)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.68/1.38  % (13062)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.68/1.38  % (13062)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.68/1.38  
% 1.68/1.38  % (13062)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 1.68/1.38  % (13062)Time elapsed: 0.011 s
% 1.68/1.38  % (13062)Instructions burned: 28 (million)
% 1.68/1.38  % (13062)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.38  % (13062)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.39  % (13065)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.68/1.39  % (13065)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.39  % (13065)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.68/1.39  % (13065)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.68/1.39  
% 1.68/1.39  
% 1.68/1.39  % (13065)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.68/1.39  % (13065)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 1.68/1.39  % (13065)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 1.68/1.39  % (13065)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.39  % (13065)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.39  % (13066)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.68/1.39  % (13066)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.39  % (13066)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.68/1.39  % (13066)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.68/1.39  % (13066)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.68/1.39  
% 1.68/1.39  % (13066)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.68/1.39  % (13066)Time elapsed: 0.013 s
% 1.68/1.39  % (13066)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
% 1.68/1.39  % (13066)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.39  % (13066)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.39  % (13070)dis+21_1:1_cbe=off:cnfonf=off:fs=off:fsr=off:hud=1:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 1.68/1.39  % (13070)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.68/1.39  % (13070)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.39  % (13070)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.68/1.39  % (13070)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.68/1.39  % (13070)Termination phase: Preprocessing 2
% 1.68/1.39  
% 1.68/1.39  % (13070)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 1.68/1.39  % (13070)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.68/1.39  % (13070)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.68/1.39  % (13070)------------------------------
% 1.68/1.39  % (13070)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.40  % (13067)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 1.79/1.40  % (13068)lrs+1002_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:hud=14:prag=on:sp=weighted_frequency:tnu=1:i=37:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 1.79/1.40  % (13069)lrs+2_16:1_acc=model:au=on:bd=off:c=on:e2e=on:nm=2:sos=all:i=15:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/15Mi)
% 1.79/1.40  % (13067)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.79/1.40  % (13067)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.40  % (13067)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.79/1.40  % (13067)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.79/1.40  % (13067)Termination phase: Preprocessing 3
% 1.79/1.40  
% 1.79/1.40  % (13067)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 1.79/1.40  % (13067)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.79/1.40  % (13067)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.79/1.40  % (13067)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.40  % (13067)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.40  % (13073)lrs+10_1:1_acc=on:amm=sco:cs=on:tgt=full:i=16:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/16Mi)
% 1.79/1.40  % (13071)lrs+1002_1:1_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=4203469,65536:i=1041:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/1041Mi)
% 1.79/1.41  % (13073)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.79/1.41  % (13073)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.41  % (13073)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.79/1.41  % (13073)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.79/1.41  % (13073)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.79/1.41  
% 1.79/1.41  % (13073)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.79/1.41  % (13073)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 1.79/1.41  % (13073)Instructions burned: 16 (million)
% 1.79/1.41  % (13073)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.41  % (13073)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.41  % (13069)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.79/1.41  % (13069)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.41  % (13069)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.79/1.41  % (13069)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.79/1.41  % (13069)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.79/1.41  
% 1.79/1.41  % (13069)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 1.79/1.41  % (13069)Time elapsed: 0.011 s
% 1.79/1.41  % (13069)Instructions burned: 15 (million)
% 1.79/1.41  % (13069)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.41  % (13069)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.41  % (13072)lrs+10_1:1_av=off:chr=on:plsq=on:slsq=on:i=7:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 1.79/1.41  % (13072)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.79/1.41  % (13072)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.41  % (13072)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.79/1.41  % (13072)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.79/1.41  % (13072)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 1.79/1.41  
% 1.79/1.41  % (13072)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 1.79/1.41  % (13072)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 1.79/1.41  % (13072)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 1.79/1.41  % (13072)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.41  % (13072)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.42  % (13075)lrs+2_1:1_apa=on:au=on:bd=preordered:cnfonf=off:cs=on:ixr=off:sos=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 1.79/1.42  % (13075)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.79/1.42  % (13075)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.42  % (13075)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.79/1.42  % (13075)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.79/1.42  % (13075)Termination phase: Preprocessing 1
% 1.79/1.42  
% 1.79/1.42  % (13075)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 1.79/1.42  % (13075)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.79/1.42  % (13075)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.79/1.42  % (13075)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.42  % (13075)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.42  % (13074)lrs+21_1:1_au=on:cnfonf=off:fd=preordered:fe=off:fsr=off:hud=11:inj=on:kws=precedence:s2pl=no:sp=weighted_frequency:tgt=full:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 1.79/1.42  % (13068)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.79/1.42  % (13068)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.42  % (13068)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.79/1.42  % (13068)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.79/1.42  % (13068)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.79/1.42  
% 1.79/1.42  % (13068)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 1.79/1.42  % (13068)Time elapsed: 0.023 s
% 1.79/1.42  % (13068)Instructions burned: 38 (million)
% 1.79/1.42  % (13068)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.42  % (13068)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.42  % (13074)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.79/1.42  % (13074)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.42  % (13074)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.79/1.42  % (13074)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.79/1.42  % (13074)Termination phase: Preprocessing 1
% 1.79/1.42  
% 1.79/1.42  % (13074)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 1.79/1.42  % (13074)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.79/1.42  % (13074)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.79/1.42  % (13074)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.42  % (13074)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.43  % (13076)lrs+10_1:1_cnfonf=off:cs=on:hud=3:prag=on:sup=off:i=7:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 1.79/1.43  % (13078)dis+1004_1:1_cha=on:cs=on:fe=off:hud=1:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.79/1.43  % (13076)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.79/1.43  % (13076)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.43  % (13076)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.79/1.43  % (13076)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.79/1.43  % (13076)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.79/1.43  
% 1.79/1.43  % (13076)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.79/1.43  % (13076)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 1.79/1.43  % (13076)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 1.79/1.43  % (13076)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.43  % (13076)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.43  % (13078)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.79/1.43  % (13078)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.43  % (13078)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.79/1.43  % (13078)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.79/1.43  % (13078)Termination phase: Preprocessing 2
% 1.79/1.43  
% 1.79/1.43  % (13078)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 1.79/1.43  % (13078)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.79/1.43  % (13078)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.79/1.43  % (13078)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.43  % (13078)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.43  % (13077)dis+1002_1:1_add=large:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=off:prag=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_12734 for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 1.79/1.43  % (13071)First to succeed.
% 1.79/1.43  % (13077)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.79/1.43  % (13077)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.43  % (13077)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.79/1.43  % (13077)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.79/1.43  % (13077)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 1.79/1.43  
% 1.79/1.43  % (13077)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 1.79/1.43  % (13077)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.79/1.43  % (13077)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.79/1.43  % (13077)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.43  % (13077)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.43  % (13071)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.79/1.43  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_12734
% 1.79/1.43  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_12734
% 1.79/1.43  thf(type_def_6, type, elem: $tType).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(type_def_7, type, nat: $tType).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(type_def_8, type, list: $tType).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(func_def_0, type, isPer: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > X0 > $o) > $o)).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(func_def_2, type, elem: $tType).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(func_def_3, type, elemStar: elem > elem > $o).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(func_def_4, type, nat: $tType).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(func_def_5, type, natStar: nat > nat > $o).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(func_def_6, type, zero: nat).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(func_def_7, type, suc: nat > nat).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(func_def_8, type, plus: nat > nat > nat).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(func_def_9, type, list: $tType).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(func_def_10, type, listStar: nat > list > list > $o).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(func_def_11, type, nil: list).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(func_def_12, type, cons: nat > elem > list > list).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(func_def_13, type, app: nat > nat > list > list > list).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(func_def_30, type, ph1: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(f256,plain,(
% 1.79/1.43    $false),
% 1.79/1.43    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f255])).
% 1.79/1.43  thf(f255,plain,(
% 1.79/1.43    ($true = $false)),
% 1.79/1.43    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f254,f94])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f94,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ((listStar @ zero @ (app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil) @ nil) = $false)),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f84])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f84,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ((~ (listStar @ zero @ (app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil) @ nil)) = $true)),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(backward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f68,f83])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f83,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ( ! [X1 : nat] : (((plus @ zero @ X1) = X1)) )),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f82])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f82,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ( ! [X1 : nat] : ((((plus @ zero @ X1) = X1) = $true)) )),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f81])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f81,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ( ! [X1 : nat] : ((((^[Y0 : nat]: ((plus @ zero @ Y0) = Y0)) @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f69])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f69,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ((!! @ nat @ (^[Y0 : nat]: ((plus @ zero @ Y0) = Y0))) = $true)),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f41])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f41,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ((!! @ nat @ (^[Y0 : nat]: ((plus @ zero @ Y0) = Y0))) = $true)),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f40])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f40,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ! [X0 : nat] : ((plus @ zero @ X0) = X0)),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f12,axiom,(
% 1.79/1.44    ! [X6 : nat] : ((plus @ zero @ X6) = X6)),
% 1.79/1.44    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xVPkMCFDQR/DTF2THF_12734.p',ax1)).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f68,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ((~ (listStar @ (plus @ zero @ zero) @ (app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil) @ nil)) = $true)),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f39])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ((~ (listStar @ (plus @ zero @ zero) @ (app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil) @ nil)) = $true)),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f38])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f38,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ~(listStar @ (plus @ zero @ zero) @ (app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil) @ nil)),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f18,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.79/1.44    ~(listStar @ (plus @ zero @ zero) @ (app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil) @ nil)),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f17])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f17,conjecture,(
% 1.79/1.44    (listStar @ (plus @ zero @ zero) @ (app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil) @ nil)),
% 1.79/1.44    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xVPkMCFDQR/DTF2THF_12734.p',list_app_nil_base)).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f254,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ((listStar @ zero @ (app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil) @ nil) = $true)),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(boolean_simplification,[status(thm)],[f252])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f252,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    (($true => (listStar @ zero @ (app @ zero @ zero @ nil @ nil) @ nil)) = $true)),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f242,f60])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f60,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ((listStar @ zero @ nil @ nil) = $true)),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f53])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f53,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ((listStar @ zero @ nil @ nil) = $true)),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f52])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f52,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    (listStar @ zero @ nil @ nil)),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f5,axiom,(
% 1.79/1.44    (listStar @ zero @ nil @ nil)),
% 1.79/1.44    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xVPkMCFDQR/DTF2THF_12734.p',nil_tp_ax)).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f242,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ( ! [X2 : nat,X1 : list] : ((((listStar @ X2 @ X1 @ X1) => (listStar @ X2 @ (app @ zero @ X2 @ nil @ X1) @ X1)) = $true)) )),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(forward_demodulation,[status(thm)],[f238,f83])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f238,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ( ! [X2 : nat,X1 : list] : ((((listStar @ X2 @ X1 @ X1) => (listStar @ (plus @ zero @ X2) @ (app @ zero @ X2 @ nil @ X1) @ X1)) = $true)) )),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f236])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f236,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ( ! [X2 : nat,X1 : list] : ((((^[Y0 : nat]: ((listStar @ Y0 @ X1 @ X1) => (listStar @ (plus @ zero @ Y0) @ (app @ zero @ Y0 @ nil @ X1) @ X1))) @ X2) = $true)) )),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f229])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f229,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ( ! [X1 : list] : (((!! @ nat @ (^[Y0 : nat]: ((listStar @ Y0 @ X1 @ X1) => (listStar @ (plus @ zero @ Y0) @ (app @ zero @ Y0 @ nil @ X1) @ X1)))) = $true)) )),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f228])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f228,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ( ! [X1 : list] : ((((^[Y0 : list]: (!! @ nat @ (^[Y1 : nat]: ((listStar @ Y1 @ Y0 @ Y0) => (listStar @ (plus @ zero @ Y1) @ (app @ zero @ Y1 @ nil @ Y0) @ Y0))))) @ X1) = $true)) )),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(pi_clausification,[status(thm)],[f64])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f64,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ((!! @ list @ (^[Y0 : list]: (!! @ nat @ (^[Y1 : nat]: ((listStar @ Y1 @ Y0 @ Y0) => (listStar @ (plus @ zero @ Y1) @ (app @ zero @ Y1 @ nil @ Y0) @ Y0)))))) = $true)),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f23])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ((!! @ list @ (^[Y0 : list]: (!! @ nat @ (^[Y1 : nat]: ((listStar @ Y1 @ Y0 @ Y0) => (listStar @ (plus @ zero @ Y1) @ (app @ zero @ Y1 @ nil @ Y0) @ Y0)))))) = $true)),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f22])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.79/1.44    ! [X0 : nat,X1 : list] : ((listStar @ X0 @ X1 @ X1) => (listStar @ (plus @ zero @ X0) @ (app @ zero @ X0 @ nil @ X1) @ X1))),
% 1.79/1.44    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.79/1.44  thf(f14,axiom,(
% 1.79/1.44    ! [X6 : nat,X2 : list] : ((listStar @ X6 @ X2 @ X2) => (listStar @ (plus @ zero @ X6) @ (app @ zero @ X6 @ nil @ X2) @ X2))),
% 1.79/1.44    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xVPkMCFDQR/DTF2THF_12734.p',ax3)).
% 1.79/1.44  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_12734
% 1.79/1.44  % (13071)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.44  % (13071)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.79/1.44  % (13071)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.79/1.44  
% 1.79/1.44  % (13071)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 1.79/1.44  % (13071)Time elapsed: 0.031 s
% 1.79/1.44  % (13071)Instructions burned: 46 (million)
% 1.79/1.44  % (13071)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.44  % (13071)------------------------------
% 1.79/1.44  % (13059)Success in time 0.063 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------