↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : FLD004-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:23:05 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 16.98s 2.93s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 16.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   39 (  13 unt;   6 nHn;  39 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   89 (   0 equ;  53 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(transitivity_of_equality,axiom,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',transitivity_of_equality) ).

cnf(existence_of_identity_multiplication,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(multiply(multiplicative_identity,X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',existence_of_identity_multiplication) ).

cnf(compatibility_of_equality_and_multiplication,axiom,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | equalish(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',compatibility_of_equality_and_multiplication) ).

cnf(commutativity_multiplication,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',commutativity_multiplication) ).

cnf(multiply_not_equal_to_a_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(multiply(a,multiply(b,multiplicative_inverse(b))),a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply_not_equal_to_a_4) ).

cnf(a_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

cnf(existence_of_inverse_multiplication,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(X1,additive_identity)
    | equalish(multiply(X1,multiplicative_inverse(X1)),multiplicative_identity) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',existence_of_inverse_multiplication) ).

cnf(b_not_equal_to_additive_identity_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(b,additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_not_equal_to_additive_identity_3) ).

cnf(b_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_is_defined) ).

cnf(well_definedness_of_multiplication,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | defined(multiply(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',well_definedness_of_multiplication) ).

cnf(well_definedness_of_multiplicative_inverse,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(X1,additive_identity)
    | defined(multiplicative_inverse(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',well_definedness_of_multiplicative_inverse) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitivity_of_equality]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(multiply(multiplicative_identity,X1),X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[existence_of_identity_multiplication]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(multiply(multiplicative_identity,X1),X1) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | equalish(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[compatibility_of_equality_and_multiplication]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,multiply(multiplicative_identity,X2))
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | equalish(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2)) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,multiplicative_identity)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | equalish(multiply(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[commutativity_multiplication]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(multiply(a,multiply(b,multiplicative_inverse(b))),a),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[multiply_not_equal_to_a_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,multiplicative_identity)
    | ~ equalish(X1,multiply(X3,X2))
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X2,X1)) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(multiply(a,multiply(b,multiplicative_inverse(b))),a),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,multiplicative_identity)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(multiply(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    a_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(X1,additive_identity)
    | equalish(multiply(X1,multiplicative_inverse(X1)),multiplicative_identity) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[existence_of_inverse_multiplication]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(b,additive_identity),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[b_not_equal_to_additive_identity_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ equalish(multiply(b,multiplicative_inverse(b)),multiplicative_identity)
    | ~ defined(multiply(b,multiplicative_inverse(b))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(X1,additive_identity)
    | equalish(multiply(X1,multiplicative_inverse(X1)),multiplicative_identity) ),
    c_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    defined(b),
    b_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(b,additive_identity),
    c_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | defined(multiply(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[well_definedness_of_multiplication]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ defined(multiply(b,multiplicative_inverse(b))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | defined(multiply(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(X1,additive_identity)
    | defined(multiplicative_inverse(X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[well_definedness_of_multiplicative_inverse]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ defined(multiplicative_inverse(b)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(X1,additive_identity)
    | defined(multiplicative_inverse(X1)) ),
    c_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_30])]),c_0_31]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : FLD004-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:36:27 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 16.98/2.93  % Version: 3.5.1
% 16.98/2.93  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 16.98/2.93  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 16.98/2.93  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 16.98/2.93  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 16.98/2.93  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 16.98/2.93  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 16.98/2.93  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2109979 completed with status 0
% 16.98/2.93  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 16.98/2.93  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 16.98/2.93  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 16.98/2.93  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 16.98/2.93  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 16.98/2.93  % No SInE strategy applied
% 16.98/2.93  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 16.98/2.93  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 16.98/2.93  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 16.98/2.93  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 16.98/2.93  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 254s (1) cores
% 16.98/2.93  % Starting new_bool_3 with 254s (1) cores
% 16.98/2.93  % Starting new_bool_1 with 254s (1) cores
% 16.98/2.93  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 2109987 completed with status 0
% 16.98/2.93  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 16.98/2.93  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 16.98/2.93  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 16.98/2.93  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 16.98/2.93  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 16.98/2.93  % No SInE strategy applied
% 16.98/2.93  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 16.98/2.93  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 16.98/2.93  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 16.98/2.93  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 16.98/2.93  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 254s (1) cores
% 16.98/2.93  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 16.98/2.93  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 16.98/2.93  
% 16.98/2.93  % Proof found!
% 16.98/2.93  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 16.98/2.93  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 16.98/2.93  % Parsed axioms                        : 31
% 16.98/2.93  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 16.98/2.93  % Initial clauses                      : 31
% 16.98/2.93  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 16.98/2.93  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 31
% 16.98/2.93  % Processed clauses                    : 14231
% 16.98/2.93  % ...of these trivial                  : 71
% 16.98/2.93  % ...subsumed                          : 11499
% 16.98/2.93  % ...remaining for further processing  : 2661
% 16.98/2.93  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 16.98/2.93  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 16.98/2.93  % Backward-subsumed                    : 262
% 16.98/2.93  % Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 16.98/2.93  % Generated clauses                    : 110960
% 16.98/2.93  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 103078
% 16.98/2.93  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 16.98/2.93  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 78
% 16.98/2.93  % Paramodulations                      : 110960
% 16.98/2.93  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 16.98/2.93  % NegExts                              : 0
% 16.98/2.93  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 16.98/2.93  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 16.98/2.93  % Total rewrite steps                  : 53856
% 16.98/2.93  % ...of those cached                   : 53722
% 16.98/2.93  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 16.98/2.93  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 16.98/2.93  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 16.98/2.93  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 16.98/2.93  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 16.98/2.93  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 16.98/2.93  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 16.98/2.93  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 16.98/2.93  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 16.98/2.93  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 16.98/2.93  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 16.98/2.93  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 16.98/2.93  % Current number of processed clauses  : 2363
% 16.98/2.93  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 147
% 16.98/2.93  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 16.98/2.93  %    Negative unit clauses             : 174
% 16.98/2.93  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2042
% 16.98/2.93  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 88718
% 16.98/2.93  % ...number of literals in the above   : 396260
% 16.98/2.93  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 16.98/2.93  % Current number of archived clauses   : 298
% 16.98/2.93  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 376103
% 16.98/2.93  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 197056
% 16.98/2.93  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5560
% 16.98/2.93  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23360
% 16.98/2.93  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 16.98/2.93  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 138
% 16.98/2.93  % BW rewrite match successes           : 14
% 16.98/2.93  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 16.98/2.93  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 16.98/2.93  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1873945
% 16.98/2.93  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 73
% 16.98/2.93  
% 16.98/2.93  % -------------------------------------------------
% 16.98/2.93  % User time                : 2.351 s
% 16.98/2.93  % System time              : 0.082 s
% 16.98/2.93  % Total time               : 2.433 s
% 16.98/2.93  % Maximum resident set size: 3404 pages
% 16.98/2.93  
% 16.98/2.93  % -------------------------------------------------
% 16.98/2.93  % User time                : 11.548 s
% 16.98/2.93  % System time              : 0.435 s
% 16.98/2.93  % Total time               : 11.983 s
% 16.98/2.93  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 16.98/2.93  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------