%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : FLD006-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VAEQUPqN2Q true
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:33:07 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.75s
% Output : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : FLD006-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VAEQUPqN2Q true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 18:26:53 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.45/0.63 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.45/0.63 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.45/0.63 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.56/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.75 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.56/0.75 % BCE start: 28
% 0.56/0.75 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.56/0.75 % PE start: 28
% 0.56/0.75 logic: neq
% 0.56/0.75 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.56/0.75 % done 20 iterations in 0.023s
% 0.56/0.75 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.56/0.75 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.56/0.75 thf(defined_type, type, defined: $i > $o).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(additive_identity_type, type, additive_identity: $i).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(add_type, type, add: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(equalish_type, type, equalish: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(additive_inverse_type, type, additive_inverse: $i > $i).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(well_definedness_of_additive_inverse, axiom,
% 0.56/0.75 (( defined @ ( additive_inverse @ X ) ) | ( ~( defined @ X ) ))).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 0.56/0.75 (![X0 : $i]: ( (defined @ (additive_inverse @ X0)) | ~ (defined @ X0))),
% 0.56/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [well_definedness_of_additive_inverse])).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(existence_of_inverse_addition, axiom,
% 0.56/0.75 (( equalish @ ( add @ X @ ( additive_inverse @ X ) ) @ additive_identity ) |
% 0.56/0.75 ( ~( defined @ X ) ))).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.56/0.75 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.75 ( (equalish @ (add @ X0 @ (additive_inverse @ X0)) @ additive_identity)
% 0.56/0.75 | ~ (defined @ X0))),
% 0.56/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [existence_of_inverse_addition])).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(existence_of_identity_addition, axiom,
% 0.56/0.75 (( equalish @ ( add @ additive_identity @ X ) @ X ) | ( ~( defined @ X ) ))).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.56/0.75 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.75 ( (equalish @ (add @ additive_identity @ X0) @ X0) | ~ (defined @ X0))),
% 0.56/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [existence_of_identity_addition])).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(symmetry_of_equality, axiom,
% 0.56/0.75 (( equalish @ X @ Y ) | ( ~( equalish @ Y @ X ) ))).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain,
% 0.56/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (equalish @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (equalish @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.56/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_equality])).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl31, plain,
% 0.56/0.75 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.75 (~ (defined @ X0) | (equalish @ X0 @ (add @ additive_identity @ X0)))),
% 0.56/0.75 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl21])).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(transitivity_of_equality, axiom,
% 0.56/0.75 (( equalish @ X @ Z ) | ( ~( equalish @ X @ Y ) ) |
% 0.56/0.75 ( ~( equalish @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain,
% 0.56/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.75 ( (equalish @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.56/0.75 | ~ (equalish @ X0 @ X2)
% 0.56/0.75 | ~ (equalish @ X2 @ X1))),
% 0.56/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [transitivity_of_equality])).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl41, plain,
% 0.56/0.75 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.75 (~ (defined @ X0)
% 0.56/0.75 | (equalish @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.56/0.75 | ~ (equalish @ (add @ additive_identity @ X0) @ X1))),
% 0.56/0.75 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl31, zip_derived_cl22])).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl53, plain,
% 0.56/0.75 ((~ (defined @ additive_identity)
% 0.56/0.75 | ~ (defined @ (additive_inverse @ additive_identity))
% 0.56/0.75 | (equalish @ (additive_inverse @ additive_identity) @
% 0.56/0.75 additive_identity))),
% 0.56/0.75 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl41])).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(well_definedness_of_additive_identity, axiom,
% 0.56/0.75 (defined @ additive_identity)).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain, ( (defined @ additive_identity)),
% 0.56/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [well_definedness_of_additive_identity])).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl58, plain,
% 0.56/0.75 ((~ (defined @ (additive_inverse @ additive_identity))
% 0.56/0.75 | (equalish @ (additive_inverse @ additive_identity) @
% 0.56/0.75 additive_identity))),
% 0.56/0.75 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl53, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(additive_inverse_not_equal_to_additive_identity_1, conjecture,
% 0.56/0.75 (equalish @ ( additive_inverse @ additive_identity ) @ additive_identity)).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.56/0.75 (~( equalish @ ( additive_inverse @ additive_identity ) @ additive_identity )),
% 0.56/0.75 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)],
% 0.56/0.75 [additive_inverse_not_equal_to_additive_identity_1])).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain,
% 0.56/0.75 (~ (equalish @ (additive_inverse @ additive_identity) @ additive_identity)),
% 0.56/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl59, plain,
% 0.56/0.75 (~ (defined @ (additive_inverse @ additive_identity))),
% 0.56/0.75 inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl58, zip_derived_cl27])).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl60, plain, (~ (defined @ additive_identity)),
% 0.56/0.75 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl59])).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain, ( (defined @ additive_identity)),
% 0.56/0.75 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [well_definedness_of_additive_identity])).
% 0.56/0.75 thf(zip_derived_cl61, plain, ($false),
% 0.56/0.75 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl60, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 % Terminating...
% 0.61/0.85 % Runner terminated.
% 0.61/0.86 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------