↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : FLD010-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:11:26 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 10.85s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (  21   ~;  19   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   0 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(existence_of_identity_multiplication,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] :
      ( ~ defined(VAR_0)
      | equalish(multiply(multiplicative_identity,VAR_0),VAR_0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',existence_of_identity_multiplication) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    ( ~ defined(A)
    | equalish(multiply(multiplicative_identity,A),A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[existence_of_identity_multiplication]) ).

fof(existence_of_inverse_multiplication,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] :
      ( equalish(VAR_0,additive_identity)
      | ~ defined(VAR_0)
      | equalish(multiply(VAR_0,multiplicative_inverse(VAR_0)),multiplicative_identity) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',existence_of_inverse_multiplication) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    ( equalish(A,additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(A)
    | equalish(multiply(A,multiplicative_inverse(A)),multiplicative_identity) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[existence_of_inverse_multiplication]) ).

fof(well_definedness_of_multiplicative_identity,axiom,
    defined(multiplicative_identity),
    file('theBenchmark.p',well_definedness_of_multiplicative_identity) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    defined(multiplicative_identity),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[well_definedness_of_multiplicative_identity]) ).

fof(well_definedness_of_multiplicative_inverse,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] :
      ( equalish(VAR_0,additive_identity)
      | ~ defined(VAR_0)
      | defined(multiplicative_inverse(VAR_0)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',well_definedness_of_multiplicative_inverse) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ( equalish(A,additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(A)
    | defined(multiplicative_inverse(A)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[well_definedness_of_multiplicative_inverse]) ).

fof(symmetry_of_equality,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( ~ equalish(VAR_1,VAR_0)
      | equalish(VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',symmetry_of_equality) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(B,A)
    | equalish(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[symmetry_of_equality]) ).

fof(transitivity_of_equality,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( ~ equalish(VAR_2,VAR_1)
      | ~ equalish(VAR_0,VAR_2)
      | equalish(VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_equality) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(C,B)
    | ~ equalish(A,C)
    | equalish(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[transitivity_of_equality]) ).

fof(different_identities,axiom,
    ~ equalish(additive_identity,multiplicative_identity),
    file('theBenchmark.p',different_identities) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    ~ equalish(additive_identity,multiplicative_identity),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[different_identities]) ).

fof(multiplicative_inv_not_equal_to_multiplicative_id_2,axiom,
    ~ equalish(multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity),multiplicative_identity),
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_inv_not_equal_to_multiplicative_id_2) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    ~ equalish(multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity),multiplicative_identity),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_inv_not_equal_to_multiplicative_id_2]) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    ( equalish(multiplicative_identity,additive_identity)
    | equalish(multiply(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity)),multiplicative_identity) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_110,plain,
    ( equalish(multiplicative_identity,additive_identity)
    | defined(multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_118,plain,
    ~ equalish(multiplicative_identity,additive_identity),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_27]) ).

cnf(c_119,plain,
    defined(multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_110]) ).

cnf(c_120,plain,
    equalish(multiply(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity)),multiplicative_identity),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_118,c_89]) ).

cnf(c_361,plain,
    equalish(multiply(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity)),multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_119,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_1910,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(A,multiplicative_identity)
    | ~ equalish(multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity),A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_28]) ).

cnf(c_1901,plain,
    ~ equalish(multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity),multiply(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1910,c_120]) ).

cnf(c_1911,plain,
    ~ equalish(multiply(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity)),multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_1901]) ).

cnf(c_1909,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_361,c_1911]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : FLD010-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/10.68  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.19/10.68  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/10.68  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/10.68  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/10.68  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/10.68  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/10.68  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/10.68  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 02:21:43 UTC 2026
% 0.19/10.68  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/10.68  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.19/10.68  % Process 526655 was started by sandbox2 on n010,
% 0.19/10.68  % Sun Sep 27 02:21:43 2026
% 0.19/10.68  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.19/10.69  
% 0.19/10.69  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.24/10.85  
% 0.24/10.85  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.24/10.85  
% 0.24/10.85  % Proof 1 at 0.10 (+ 0.05) seconds.
% 0.24/10.85  % Length of proof is 16.
% 0.24/10.85  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.24/10.85  % Maximum clause weight is 26.000.
% 0.24/10.85  % Given clauses 248.
% 0.24/10.85  
% 0.24/10.85  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------