↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : FLD013-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:22:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.53s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   49 (  29 unt;   0 nHn;  49 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   78 (   0 equ;  32 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(compatibility_of_equality_and_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X3,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',compatibility_of_equality_and_addition) ).

cnf(c_equals_d_6,negated_conjecture,
    equalish(c,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_equals_d_6) ).

cnf(commutativity_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',commutativity_addition) ).

cnf(symmetry_of_equality,axiom,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,X1)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',symmetry_of_equality) ).

cnf(a_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

cnf(d_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d_is_defined) ).

cnf(transitivity_of_equality,axiom,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',transitivity_of_equality) ).

cnf(a_equals_b_5,negated_conjecture,
    equalish(a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_equals_b_5) ).

cnf(b_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_is_defined) ).

cnf(c_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_is_defined) ).

cnf(add_not_equal_to_add_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(add(a,c),add(d,b)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',add_not_equal_to_add_7) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[compatibility_of_equality_and_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X3,X2)) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    equalish(c,d),
    c_equals_d_6 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[commutativity_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,X1)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[symmetry_of_equality]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(add(c,X1),add(d,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    a_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X2,X1)) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    defined(d),
    d_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitivity_of_equality]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,X1)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    equalish(add(c,a),add(d,a)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(add(d,X1),add(X1,d)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    equalish(a,b),
    a_equals_b_5 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    equalish(add(d,a),add(c,a)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    equalish(add(d,a),add(a,d)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    defined(b),
    b_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(add(a,X1),add(b,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,add(d,a))
    | equalish(X1,add(c,a)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
    equalish(add(a,d),add(d,a)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    equalish(add(d,b),add(b,d)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
    equalish(add(a,d),add(b,d)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    equalish(add(a,d),add(c,a)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
    equalish(add(b,d),add(d,b)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,add(a,d))
    | equalish(X1,add(b,d)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,hypothesis,
    equalish(add(c,a),add(a,d)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
    defined(c),
    c_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_39,hypothesis,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,add(b,d))
    | equalish(X1,add(d,b)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
    equalish(add(c,a),add(b,d)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(add(c,X1),add(X1,c)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,hypothesis,
    equalish(add(c,a),add(d,b)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,hypothesis,
    equalish(add(c,a),add(a,c)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(add(a,c),add(d,b)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[add_not_equal_to_add_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,hypothesis,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,add(c,a))
    | equalish(X1,add(d,b)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,hypothesis,
    equalish(add(a,c),add(c,a)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(add(a,c),add(d,b)),
    c_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_48,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_47]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : FLD013-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:37:44 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/0.48  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.53/0.48  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.53/0.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.53/0.48  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.53/0.48  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.48  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.48  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.48  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2114079 completed with status 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.53/0.48  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.53/0.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.53/0.48  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.53/0.48  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.53/0.48  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.53/0.48  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.53/0.48  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.53/0.48  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.48  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.48  % Starting H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 296s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.48  % Starting new_bool_3 with 269s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.48  % Starting G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S08BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.48  % G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S08BN with pid 2114089 completed with status 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Result found by G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S08BN
% 0.53/0.48  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.53/0.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.53/0.48  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.53/0.48  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.53/0.48  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.53/0.48  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.53/0.48  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.53/0.48  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.48  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.48  % Starting H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 296s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.48  % Starting new_bool_3 with 269s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.48  % Starting G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S08BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.53/0.48  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.53/0.48  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.53/0.48  
% 0.53/0.48  % Proof found!
% 0.53/0.48  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.53/0.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.53/0.48  % Parsed axioms                        : 34
% 0.53/0.48  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Initial clauses                      : 34
% 0.53/0.48  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 34
% 0.53/0.48  % Processed clauses                    : 466
% 0.53/0.48  % ...of these trivial                  : 28
% 0.53/0.48  % ...subsumed                          : 46
% 0.53/0.48  % ...remaining for further processing  : 392
% 0.53/0.48  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Generated clauses                    : 2148
% 0.53/0.48  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1604
% 0.53/0.48  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Paramodulations                      : 2148
% 0.53/0.48  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Total rewrite steps                  : 512
% 0.53/0.48  % ...of those cached                   : 351
% 0.53/0.48  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.53/0.48  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.53/0.48  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.53/0.48  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.53/0.48  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.53/0.48  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.53/0.48  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.53/0.48  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.53/0.48  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.53/0.48  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.53/0.48  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.53/0.48  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.53/0.48  % Current number of processed clauses  : 358
% 0.53/0.48  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 177
% 0.53/0.48  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.53/0.48  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.53/0.48  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 179
% 0.53/0.48  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1199
% 0.53/0.48  % ...number of literals in the above   : 3264
% 0.53/0.48  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Current number of archived clauses   : 34
% 0.53/0.48  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2671
% 0.53/0.48  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2428
% 0.53/0.48  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 46
% 0.53/0.48  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 266
% 0.53/0.48  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.53/0.48  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 26570
% 0.53/0.48  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 71
% 0.53/0.48  
% 0.53/0.48  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.48  % User time                : 0.042 s
% 0.53/0.48  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.53/0.48  % Total time               : 0.046 s
% 0.53/0.48  % Maximum resident set size: 3660 pages
% 0.53/0.48  
% 0.53/0.48  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.48  % User time                : 0.204 s
% 0.53/0.48  % System time              : 0.028 s
% 0.53/0.48  % Total time               : 0.232 s
% 0.53/0.48  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.53/0.48  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------