↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : FLD013-5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tvntIoqLkT true

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:33:09 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.61s 0.89s
% Output   : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : FLD013-5 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tvntIoqLkT true
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 18:31:53 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.57/0.70  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.57/0.70  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.57/0.70  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.58/0.77  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.58/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.58/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.58/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.58/0.80  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.58/0.81  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.61/0.85  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.61/0.89  % Solved by fo/fo1_av.sh.
% 0.61/0.89  % done 74 iterations in 0.056s
% 0.61/0.89  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.61/0.89  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.61/0.89  thf(sum_type, type, sum: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(v_type, type, v: $i).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(d_type, type, d: $i).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(additive_identity_type, type, additive_identity: $i).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(u_type, type, u: $i).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(defined_type, type, defined: $i > $o).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(not_sum_11, conjecture, (sum @ additive_identity @ u @ v)).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( sum @ additive_identity @ u @ v )),
% 0.61/0.89    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [not_sum_11])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl36, plain, (~ (sum @ additive_identity @ u @ v)),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(existence_of_identity_addition, axiom,
% 0.61/0.89    (( sum @ additive_identity @ X @ X ) | ( ~( defined @ X ) ))).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.61/0.89      (![X0 : $i]: ( (sum @ additive_identity @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (defined @ X0))),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [existence_of_identity_addition])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(commutativity_addition, axiom,
% 0.61/0.89    (( sum @ Y @ X @ Z ) | ( ~( sum @ X @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.61/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.89         ( (sum @ X0 @ X1 @ X2) | ~ (sum @ X1 @ X0 @ X2))),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_addition])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl53, plain,
% 0.61/0.89      (![X0 : $i]: (~ (defined @ X0) |  (sum @ X0 @ additive_identity @ X0))),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(sum_8, conjecture, (~( sum @ additive_identity @ c @ d ))).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture, (sum @ additive_identity @ c @ d),
% 0.61/0.89    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [sum_8])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain, ( (sum @ additive_identity @ c @ d)),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.61/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.89         ( (sum @ X0 @ X1 @ X2) | ~ (sum @ X1 @ X0 @ X2))),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_addition])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl55, plain, ( (sum @ c @ additive_identity @ d)),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(sum_9, conjecture, (~( sum @ a @ c @ u ))).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zf_stmt_2, negated_conjecture, (sum @ a @ c @ u),
% 0.61/0.89    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [sum_9])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain, ( (sum @ a @ c @ u)),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(associativity_addition_1, axiom,
% 0.61/0.89    (( sum @ X @ V @ W ) | ( ~( sum @ X @ Y @ U ) ) | 
% 0.61/0.89     ( ~( sum @ Y @ Z @ V ) ) | ( ~( sum @ U @ Z @ W ) ))).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.61/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.89         ( (sum @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.61/0.89          | ~ (sum @ X0 @ X3 @ X4)
% 0.61/0.89          | ~ (sum @ X3 @ X5 @ X1)
% 0.61/0.89          | ~ (sum @ X4 @ X5 @ X2))),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_addition_1])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl39, plain,
% 0.61/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.89         ( (sum @ a @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (sum @ c @ X2 @ X1) | ~ (sum @ u @ X2 @ X0))),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl34, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl118, plain,
% 0.61/0.89      (![X0 : $i]: ( (sum @ a @ d @ X0) | ~ (sum @ u @ additive_identity @ X0))),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl55, zip_derived_cl39])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl123, plain, ((~ (defined @ u) |  (sum @ a @ d @ u))),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl53, zip_derived_cl118])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(u_is_defined, axiom, (defined @ u)).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl30, plain, ( (defined @ u)),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [u_is_defined])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl124, plain, ( (sum @ a @ d @ u)),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl123, zip_derived_cl30])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(sum_7, conjecture, (~( sum @ additive_identity @ a @ b ))).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zf_stmt_3, negated_conjecture, (sum @ additive_identity @ a @ b),
% 0.61/0.89    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [sum_7])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain, ( (sum @ additive_identity @ a @ b)),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_3])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.61/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.89         ( (sum @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.61/0.89          | ~ (sum @ X0 @ X3 @ X4)
% 0.61/0.89          | ~ (sum @ X3 @ X5 @ X1)
% 0.61/0.89          | ~ (sum @ X4 @ X5 @ X2))),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_addition_1])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl37, plain,
% 0.61/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.89         ( (sum @ additive_identity @ X1 @ X0)
% 0.61/0.89          | ~ (sum @ a @ X2 @ X1)
% 0.61/0.89          | ~ (sum @ b @ X2 @ X0))),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl32, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl129, plain,
% 0.61/0.89      (![X0 : $i]: ( (sum @ additive_identity @ u @ X0) | ~ (sum @ b @ d @ X0))),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl124, zip_derived_cl37])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(sum_10, conjecture, (~( sum @ d @ b @ v ))).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zf_stmt_4, negated_conjecture, (sum @ d @ b @ v),
% 0.61/0.89    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [sum_10])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl35, plain, ( (sum @ d @ b @ v)),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_4])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.61/0.89      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.61/0.89         ( (sum @ X0 @ X1 @ X2) | ~ (sum @ X1 @ X0 @ X2))),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_addition])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl57, plain, ( (sum @ b @ d @ v)),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl35, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl154, plain, ( (sum @ additive_identity @ u @ v)),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl129, zip_derived_cl57])).
% 0.61/0.89  thf(zip_derived_cl156, plain, ($false),
% 0.61/0.89      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl36, zip_derived_cl154])).
% 0.61/0.89  
% 0.61/0.89  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.61/0.89  
% 0.61/0.89  
% 0.61/0.89  % Terminating...
% 0.61/0.99  % Runner terminated.
% 0.61/1.01  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------