↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : FLD013-5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:15:37 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.15s 11.09s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  19 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   55 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   48 (  25   ~;  23   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0 sgn  40   !;   0   ?;  24   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ sum(X4,X5,X2)
      | ~ sum(X3,X5,X1)
      | ~ sum(X0,X3,X4)
      | sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',associativity_addition_1) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ sum(X3,X5,X2)
      | ~ sum(X4,X1,X5)
      | ~ sum(X3,X4,X0)
      | sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',associativity_addition_2) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ defined(X0)
      | sum(additive_identity,X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_identity_addition) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sum(X1,X0,X2)
      | sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',commutativity_addition) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    defined(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_is_defined) ).

fof(f33,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_identity,a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_7) ).

fof(f34,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_identity,c,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_8) ).

fof(f35,negated_conjecture,
    sum(a,c,u),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_9) ).

fof(f36,negated_conjecture,
    sum(d,b,v),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_10) ).

fof(f37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,u,v),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_sum_11) ).

tcf(c_87,plain,
    defined(b),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_92,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_identity,a,b),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

tcf(c_93,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_identity,c,d),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

tcf(c_94,negated_conjecture,
    sum(a,c,u),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

tcf(c_95,negated_conjecture,
    sum(d,b,v),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

tcf(c_96,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,u,v),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

tcf(c_98,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(additive_identity,X0,X0)
      | ~ defined(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_99,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( sum(X1,X0,X2)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_100,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( sum(X2,X5,X4)
      | ~ sum(X1,X5,X3)
      | ~ sum(X0,X3,X4)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_101,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( sum(X0,X4,X5)
      | ~ sum(X2,X3,X5)
      | ~ sum(X1,X3,X4)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_104,plain,
    sum(additive_identity,b,b),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_87]) ).

tcf(c_110,plain,
    sum(a,additive_identity,b),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_92]) ).

tcf(c_111,plain,
    sum(c,additive_identity,d),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_93]) ).

tcf(c_112,plain,
    sum(c,a,u),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_94]) ).

tcf(c_126,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( sum(u,X0,X2)
      | ~ sum(c,X1,X2)
      | ~ sum(a,X0,X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_112,c_100]) ).

tcf(c_152,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( sum(c,X2,X1)
      | ~ sum(additive_identity,X0,X2)
      | ~ sum(d,X0,X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_111]) ).

tcf(c_180,plain,
    ( sum(additive_identity,u,v)
    | ~ sum(u,additive_identity,v) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_99]) ).

tcf(c_320,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(u,additive_identity,X0)
      | ~ sum(c,b,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_126,c_110]) ).

tcf(c_353,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(c,X0,v)
      | ~ sum(additive_identity,b,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_152,c_95]) ).

tcf(c_373,plain,
    sum(c,b,v),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_353,c_104]) ).

tcf(c_394,plain,
    sum(u,additive_identity,v),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_320,c_373]) ).

tcf(c_395,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_394,c_180,c_96]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : FLD013-5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/10.39  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/10.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/10.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/10.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/10.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/10.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/10.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/10.39  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 10:38:32 UTC 2026
% 0.10/10.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/10.39  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/10.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/10.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/10.44  
% 0.14/10.44  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/10.44  
% 0.14/10.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/10.45  % Proving...
% 1.15/11.09  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.15/11.09  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.15/11.09  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.15/11.09  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 1.15/11.09  % 
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e % 
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  % ------ Preprocessing...% ------  preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 1.15/11.09   gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.15/11.09  % ------ Proving...
% 1.15/11.09  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  % 
% 1.15/11.09  % clauses                               16
% 1.15/11.09  % conjectures                           5
% 1.15/11.09  % EPR                                   16
% 1.15/11.09  % Horn                                  16
% 1.15/11.09  % unary                                 12
% 1.15/11.09  % binary                                2
% 1.15/11.09  % lits                                  24
% 1.15/11.09  % lits eq                               0
% 1.15/11.09  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.15/11.09  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.15/11.09  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.15/11.09  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.15/11.09  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  % ------ Schedule EPR Horn non eq is on
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  % ------ Option_epr_horn Time Limit: Unbounded
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  % ------ 
% 1.15/11.09  % Current options:
% 1.15/11.09  % ------ 
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  % 
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  % ------ Proving...
% 1.15/11.09  % 
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.15/11.09  
% 1.15/11.09  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------