↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : FLD014-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:38:49 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 22.93s 23.42s
% Output   : Proof 22.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   60 (  42 unt;   3 nHn;  60 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   93 (   0 equ;  32 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(associativity_addition_1,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(U,Z,W)
    | ~ sum(Y,Z,V)
    | ~ sum(X,Y,U)
    | sum(X,V,W) ),
    file('FLD002-0.ax',associativity_addition_1) ).

cnf(existence_of_inverse_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X)
    | sum(additive_inverse(X),X,additive_identity) ),
    file('FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_inverse_addition) ).

cnf(commutativity_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(X,Y,Z)
    | sum(Y,X,Z) ),
    file('FLD002-0.ax',commutativity_addition) ).

cnf(well_definedness_of_additive_identity,axiom,
    defined(additive_identity),
    file('FLD002-0.ax',well_definedness_of_additive_identity) ).

cnf(well_definedness_of_additive_inverse,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X)
    | defined(additive_inverse(X)) ),
    file('FLD002-0.ax',well_definedness_of_additive_inverse) ).

cnf(antisymmetry_of_order_relation,axiom,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(Y,X)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X,Y)
    | sum(additive_identity,X,Y) ),
    file('FLD002-0.ax',antisymmetry_of_order_relation) ).

cnf(totality_of_order_relation,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(Y)
    | ~ defined(X)
    | less_or_equal(Y,X)
    | less_or_equal(X,Y) ),
    file('FLD002-0.ax',totality_of_order_relation) ).

cnf(a_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

cnf(b_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(b),
    file('theBenchmark.p',b_is_defined) ).

cnf(sum_3,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_identity,a,b),
    file('theBenchmark.p',sum_3) ).

cnf(not_sum_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,additive_inverse(a),additive_inverse(b)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',not_sum_4) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,additive_inverse(a),additive_inverse(b)),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[not_sum_4]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( ~ sum(additive_inverse(a),additive_identity,additive_inverse(b))
    | sum(additive_identity,additive_inverse(a),additive_inverse(b)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[commutativity_addition]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( ~ sum(additive_inverse(a),b,additive_identity)
    | ~ sum(b,additive_inverse(b),additive_identity)
    | ~ sum(additive_identity,additive_inverse(b),additive_inverse(b))
    | sum(additive_inverse(a),additive_identity,additive_inverse(b)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[associativity_addition_1]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(additive_inverse(b),additive_inverse(b))
    | ~ less_or_equal(additive_inverse(b),additive_inverse(b))
    | sum(additive_identity,additive_inverse(b),additive_inverse(b)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[antisymmetry_of_order_relation]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    ( ~ defined(additive_inverse(b))
    | ~ defined(additive_inverse(b))
    | less_or_equal(additive_inverse(b),additive_inverse(b))
    | less_or_equal(additive_inverse(b),additive_inverse(b)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t6:2)],[totality_of_order_relation]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t6:2]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(reduction,[status(thm),parent(t8:2)],[t8:2,t6:2]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    ( ~ defined(b)
    | defined(additive_inverse(b)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t8:3)],[well_definedness_of_additive_inverse]) ).

cnf(t12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t11:1)],[t11:1,t8:3]) ).

cnf(t13,plain,
    defined(b),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t11:2)],[b_is_defined]) ).

cnf(t14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t13:1)],[t13:1,t11:2]) ).

cnf(l6,lemma,
    defined(additive_inverse(b)),
    inference(lemma,[status(cth),parent(t8:3),below(t6:2)],[t8:3]) ).

cnf(t15,plain,
    defined(additive_inverse(b)),
    inference(lemma_extension,[status(thm),parent(t8:4)],[l6:1]) ).

cnf(t16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t15:1)],[t15:1,t8:4]) ).

cnf(l4,lemma,
    less_or_equal(additive_inverse(b),additive_inverse(b)),
    inference(lemma,[status(cth),parent(t6:2),below(t4:2)],[t6:2]) ).

cnf(t17,plain,
    less_or_equal(additive_inverse(b),additive_inverse(b)),
    inference(lemma_extension,[status(thm),parent(t6:3)],[l4:1]) ).

cnf(t18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t17:1)],[t17:1,t6:3]) ).

cnf(t19,plain,
    ( ~ sum(additive_inverse(b),b,additive_identity)
    | sum(b,additive_inverse(b),additive_identity) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:3)],[commutativity_addition]) ).

cnf(t20,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t19:1)],[t19:1,t4:3]) ).

cnf(t21,plain,
    ( ~ defined(b)
    | sum(additive_inverse(b),b,additive_identity) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t19:2)],[existence_of_inverse_addition]) ).

cnf(t22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t21:1)],[t21:1,t19:2]) ).

cnf(t23,plain,
    defined(b),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t21:2)],[b_is_defined]) ).

cnf(t24,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t23:1)],[t23:1,t21:2]) ).

cnf(t25,plain,
    ( ~ sum(additive_inverse(a),a,additive_identity)
    | ~ sum(a,additive_identity,b)
    | ~ sum(additive_identity,additive_identity,additive_identity)
    | sum(additive_inverse(a),b,additive_identity) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:4)],[associativity_addition_1]) ).

cnf(t26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t25:1)],[t25:1,t4:4]) ).

cnf(t27,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,additive_identity)
    | ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,additive_identity)
    | sum(additive_identity,additive_identity,additive_identity) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t25:2)],[antisymmetry_of_order_relation]) ).

cnf(t28,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t27:1)],[t27:1,t25:2]) ).

cnf(t29,plain,
    ( ~ defined(additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(additive_identity)
    | less_or_equal(additive_identity,additive_identity)
    | less_or_equal(additive_identity,additive_identity) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t27:2)],[totality_of_order_relation]) ).

cnf(t30,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t29:1)],[t29:1,t27:2]) ).

cnf(t31,plain,
    $false,
    inference(reduction,[status(thm),parent(t29:2)],[t29:2,t27:2]) ).

cnf(t32,plain,
    defined(additive_identity),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t29:3)],[well_definedness_of_additive_identity]) ).

cnf(t33,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t32:1)],[t32:1,t29:3]) ).

cnf(l15,lemma,
    defined(additive_identity),
    inference(lemma,[status(cth),parent(t29:3),below(t27:2)],[t29:3]) ).

cnf(t34,plain,
    defined(additive_identity),
    inference(lemma_extension,[status(thm),parent(t29:4)],[l15:1]) ).

cnf(t35,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t34:1)],[t34:1,t29:4]) ).

cnf(l13,lemma,
    less_or_equal(additive_identity,additive_identity),
    inference(lemma,[status(cth),parent(t27:2),below(t25:2)],[t27:2]) ).

cnf(t36,plain,
    less_or_equal(additive_identity,additive_identity),
    inference(lemma_extension,[status(thm),parent(t27:3)],[l13:1]) ).

cnf(t37,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t36:1)],[t36:1,t27:3]) ).

cnf(t38,plain,
    ( ~ sum(additive_identity,a,b)
    | sum(a,additive_identity,b) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t25:3)],[commutativity_addition]) ).

cnf(t39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t38:1)],[t38:1,t25:3]) ).

cnf(t40,plain,
    sum(additive_identity,a,b),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t38:2)],[sum_3]) ).

cnf(t41,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t40:1)],[t40:1,t38:2]) ).

cnf(t42,plain,
    ( ~ defined(a)
    | sum(additive_inverse(a),a,additive_identity) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t25:4)],[existence_of_inverse_addition]) ).

cnf(t43,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t42:1)],[t42:1,t25:4]) ).

cnf(t44,plain,
    defined(a),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t42:2)],[a_is_defined]) ).

cnf(t45,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t44:1)],[t44:1,t42:2]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : FLD014-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.58  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.58  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.58  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.58  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.58  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.58  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.58  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.58  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 18:51:32 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.58  % CPUTime  : 
% 22.93/23.42  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 22.93/23.42  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------