↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : FLD015-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:15:37 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.37s 1.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   87 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  100 (  52   ~;  48   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (   0 sgn  60   !;   0   ?;  43   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ sum(X4,X5,X2)
      | ~ sum(X3,X5,X1)
      | ~ sum(X0,X3,X4)
      | sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',associativity_addition_1) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ sum(X3,X5,X2)
      | ~ sum(X4,X1,X5)
      | ~ sum(X3,X4,X0)
      | sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',associativity_addition_2) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ defined(X0)
      | sum(additive_identity,X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_identity_addition) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ defined(X0)
      | sum(additive_inverse(X0),X0,additive_identity) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_inverse_addition) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sum(X1,X0,X2)
      | sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',commutativity_addition) ).

fof(f27,axiom,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    defined(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_is_defined) ).

fof(f29,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_identity,additive_inverse(a),additive_inverse(b)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_3) ).

fof(f30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_sum_4) ).

tcf(c_79,plain,
    defined(a),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_80,plain,
    defined(b),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_81,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_identity,additive_inverse(a),additive_inverse(b)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_82,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,a,b),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

tcf(c_84,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(additive_identity,X0,X0)
      | ~ defined(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_85,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( sum(X1,X0,X2)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_86,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( sum(X2,X5,X4)
      | ~ sum(X1,X5,X3)
      | ~ sum(X0,X3,X4)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_87,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( sum(X0,X4,X5)
      | ~ sum(X2,X3,X5)
      | ~ sum(X1,X3,X4)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_89,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(additive_inverse(X0),X0,additive_identity)
      | ~ defined(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_135,plain,
    ( sum(additive_identity,a,b)
    | ~ sum(a,additive_identity,b) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_85]) ).

tcf(c_140,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( sum(a,additive_identity,b)
      | ~ sum(a,X0,X2)
      | ~ sum(X2,X1,b)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,additive_identity) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_87]) ).

tcf(c_147,plain,
    ( sum(additive_identity,b,b)
    | ~ defined(b) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_84]) ).

tcf(c_180,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(a,additive_identity,b)
      | ~ sum(additive_identity,b,b)
      | ~ sum(a,X0,additive_identity)
      | ~ sum(X0,b,additive_identity) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_140]) ).

tcf(c_238,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( sum(X0,b,X4)
      | ~ sum(X1,X3,b)
      | ~ sum(X2,X3,X4)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_87]) ).

tcf(c_243,plain,
    ( sum(additive_inverse(b),b,additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(b) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_89]) ).

tcf(c_273,plain,
    sum(additive_inverse(a),additive_identity,additive_inverse(b)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_85]) ).

tcf(c_285,plain,
    sum(additive_inverse(a),additive_identity,additive_inverse(b)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_85]) ).

tcf(c_287,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(X0,additive_inverse(X0),additive_identity)
      | ~ defined(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_85]) ).

tcf(c_517,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( sum(X1,X2,additive_inverse(b))
      | ~ sum(X0,X2,additive_identity)
      | ~ sum(additive_inverse(a),X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_273,c_86]) ).

tcf(c_528,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( sum(X1,X2,additive_inverse(b))
      | ~ sum(X0,X2,additive_identity)
      | ~ sum(additive_inverse(a),X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_285,c_86]) ).

tcf(c_693,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( sum(X0,b,X2)
      | ~ sum(additive_identity,b,b)
      | ~ sum(X1,b,X2)
      | ~ sum(X0,additive_identity,X1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_238]) ).

tcf(c_951,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(X0,b,additive_identity)
      | ~ sum(additive_identity,b,b)
      | ~ sum(additive_inverse(b),b,additive_identity)
      | ~ sum(X0,additive_identity,additive_inverse(b)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_693]) ).

tcf(c_1646,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(additive_identity,X0,additive_inverse(b))
      | ~ defined(a)
      | ~ sum(a,X0,additive_identity) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_517]) ).

tcf(c_1653,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(additive_identity,X0,additive_inverse(b))
      | ~ sum(a,X0,additive_identity) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1646,c_79]) ).

tcf(c_1675,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(additive_identity,X0,additive_inverse(b))
      | ~ defined(a)
      | ~ sum(a,X0,additive_identity) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_528]) ).

tcf(c_1682,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(additive_identity,X0,additive_inverse(b))
      | ~ sum(a,X0,additive_identity) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1675,c_79]) ).

tcf(c_2055,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(X0,additive_identity,additive_inverse(b))
      | ~ sum(a,X0,additive_identity) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1653,c_85]) ).

tcf(c_2068,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ sum(a,X0,additive_identity),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_1682,c_80,c_82,c_135,c_147,c_180,c_243,c_951,c_2055]) ).

tcf(c_2071,plain,
    ~ defined(a),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_287,c_2068]) ).

tcf(c_2072,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2071,c_79]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : FLD015-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 10:37:54 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.41  % Proving...
% 4.37/1.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.37/1.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.37/1.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.37/1.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 4.37/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 4.37/1.29  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  % 
% 4.37/1.29  % clauses                               11
% 4.37/1.29  % conjectures                           2
% 4.37/1.29  % EPR                                   8
% 4.37/1.29  % Horn                                  11
% 4.37/1.29  % unary                                 5
% 4.37/1.29  % binary                                4
% 4.37/1.29  % lits                                  21
% 4.37/1.29  % lits eq                               0
% 4.37/1.29  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.37/1.29  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.37/1.29  % fd_cond                               0
% 4.37/1.29  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 4.37/1.29  % AC symbols                            0
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  % ------ 
% 4.37/1.29  % Current options:
% 4.37/1.29  % ------ 
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  % 
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 4.37/1.29  % 
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.37/1.29  
% 4.37/1.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.37/1.30  
% 4.37/1.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------