↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : FLD016-5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:22:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.27s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   57 (  26 unt;   3 nHn;  57 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  115 (   0 equ;  58 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   79 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(commutativity_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(X2,X1,X3)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',commutativity_addition) ).

cnf(associativity_addition_1,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(X5,X6,X3)
    | ~ sum(X4,X6,X2)
    | ~ sum(X1,X4,X5)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',associativity_addition_1) ).

cnf(sum_8,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_identity,q,r),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_8) ).

cnf(existence_of_identity_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_identity,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_identity_addition) ).

cnf(sum_6,negated_conjecture,
    sum(a,u,q),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_6) ).

cnf(u_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(u),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_is_defined) ).

cnf(totality_of_order_relation,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',totality_of_order_relation) ).

cnf(existence_of_inverse_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_inverse(X1),X1,additive_identity) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_inverse_addition) ).

cnf(sum_7,negated_conjecture,
    sum(a,v,r),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_7) ).

cnf(v_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(v),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',v_is_defined) ).

cnf(compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(X4,X5,X2)
    | ~ sum(X3,X5,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X3,X4)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition) ).

cnf(a_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

cnf(r_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(r),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r_is_defined) ).

cnf(antisymmetry_of_order_relation,axiom,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | sum(additive_identity,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',antisymmetry_of_order_relation) ).

cnf(not_sum_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,u,v),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_sum_9) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X2,X1,X3)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[commutativity_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X5,X6,X3)
    | ~ sum(X4,X6,X2)
    | ~ sum(X1,X4,X5)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[associativity_addition_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X2,X1,X3)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_identity,q,r),
    sum_8 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_identity,X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[existence_of_identity_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X5,X6,X3)
    | ~ sum(X4,X6,X2)
    | ~ sum(X1,X4,X5)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    sum(q,additive_identity,r),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_identity,X1,X1) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sum(X1,X3,q)
    | ~ sum(X3,additive_identity,X2)
    | sum(X1,X2,r) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(X1,additive_identity,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sum(X1,X2,q)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | sum(X1,X2,r) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    sum(a,u,q),
    sum_6 ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    defined(u),
    u_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[totality_of_order_relation]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X4,X3,X2)
    | ~ sum(X1,X4,additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(X3)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    sum(a,u,r),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_inverse(X1),X1,additive_identity) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[existence_of_inverse_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    sum(a,v,r),
    sum_7 ).

cnf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
    defined(v),
    v_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X4,X5,X2)
    | ~ sum(X3,X5,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X3,X4)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sum(X1,a,additive_identity)
    | sum(X1,r,u) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_inverse(X1),X1,additive_identity) ),
    c_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    a_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sum(X1,a,additive_identity)
    | sum(X1,r,v) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_32]),c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X4,X5,X2)
    | ~ sum(X3,X5,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X3,X4)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_34 ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X1) ),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_inverse(a),r,u),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_inverse(a),r,v),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_37]),c_0_38])]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X3,X4,X1)
    | ~ sum(X3,X4,X2)
    | ~ defined(X3)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    sum(r,additive_inverse(a),u),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,hypothesis,
    defined(r),
    r_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    sum(r,additive_inverse(a),v),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | sum(additive_identity,X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[antisymmetry_of_order_relation]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sum(r,additive_inverse(a),X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,u) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_46])]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sum(r,additive_inverse(a),X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,v) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_47]),c_0_46])]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,u,v),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_sum_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | sum(additive_identity,X1,X2) ),
    c_0_48 ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    less_or_equal(v,u),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    less_or_equal(u,v),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,u,v),
    c_0_51 ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]),c_0_54])]),c_0_55]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : FLD016-5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.44  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.45  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:39:47 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.27/0.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.27/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/0.60  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.27/0.60  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.60  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.60  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.60  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.60  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.60  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.60  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3626261 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.60  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.27/0.60  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.60  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.60  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.60  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.27/0.60  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.27/0.60  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/0.60  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.27/0.60  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.60  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.60  % Starting H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 296s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.60  % Starting new_bool_3 with 269s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.60  % Starting G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S08BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.60  % new_bool_3 with pid 3626270 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.60  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.27/0.60  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.60  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.60  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.60  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.27/0.60  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.27/0.60  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/0.60  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.27/0.60  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.60  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.60  % Starting H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 296s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.60  % Starting new_bool_3 with 269s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.60  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.27/0.60  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.27/0.60  
% 0.27/0.60  % Proof found!
% 0.27/0.60  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.27/0.60  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/0.60  % Parsed axioms                        : 35
% 0.27/0.60  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.27/0.60  % Initial clauses                      : 35
% 0.27/0.60  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.27/0.60  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 35
% 0.27/0.60  % Processed clauses                    : 320
% 0.27/0.60  % ...of these trivial                  : 22
% 0.27/0.60  % ...subsumed                          : 14
% 0.27/0.60  % ...remaining for further processing  : 284
% 0.27/0.60  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.27/0.60  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.27/0.60  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.27/0.60  % Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.27/0.60  % Generated clauses                    : 1225
% 0.27/0.60  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 981
% 0.27/0.60  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.27/0.60  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.27/0.60  % Paramodulations                      : 1223
% 0.27/0.60  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.27/0.60  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.27/0.60  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.27/0.60  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.27/0.60  % Total rewrite steps                  : 847
% 0.27/0.60  % ...of those cached                   : 775
% 0.27/0.60  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.27/0.60  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.27/0.60  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.27/0.60  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.27/0.60  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.27/0.60  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.27/0.60  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.27/0.60  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.27/0.60  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.27/0.60  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.27/0.60  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.27/0.60  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.27/0.60  % Current number of processed clauses  : 244
% 0.27/0.60  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 92
% 0.27/0.60  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/0.60  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.27/0.60  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 150
% 0.27/0.60  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 731
% 0.27/0.60  % ...number of literals in the above   : 2156
% 0.27/0.60  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.27/0.60  % Current number of archived clauses   : 40
% 0.27/0.60  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1059
% 0.27/0.60  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 826
% 0.27/0.60  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 14
% 0.27/0.60  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 516
% 0.27/0.60  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.27/0.60  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 23
% 0.27/0.60  % BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 0.27/0.60  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.27/0.60  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.27/0.60  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 16710
% 0.27/0.60  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 116
% 0.27/0.60  
% 0.27/0.60  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.60  % User time                : 0.047 s
% 0.27/0.60  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.27/0.60  % Total time               : 0.051 s
% 0.27/0.60  % Maximum resident set size: 3660 pages
% 0.27/0.60  
% 0.27/0.60  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.60  % User time                : 0.220 s
% 0.27/0.60  % System time              : 0.021 s
% 0.27/0.60  % Total time               : 0.241 s
% 0.27/0.60  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.27/0.60  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------