↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : FLD016-5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:15:37 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 13.90s 2.82s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 13.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   95 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  108 (  55   ~;  53   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   0 sgn  49   !;   0   ?;  38   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ sum(X4,X5,X2)
      | ~ sum(X3,X5,X1)
      | ~ sum(X0,X3,X4)
      | sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',associativity_addition_1) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ defined(X0)
      | sum(additive_identity,X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_identity_addition) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ defined(X0)
      | sum(additive_inverse(X0),X0,additive_identity) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_inverse_addition) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sum(X1,X0,X2)
      | sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',commutativity_addition) ).

fof(f27,axiom,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    defined(u),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_is_defined) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    defined(v),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',v_is_defined) ).

fof(f32,negated_conjecture,
    sum(a,u,q),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_6) ).

fof(f33,negated_conjecture,
    sum(a,v,r),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_7) ).

fof(f34,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_identity,q,r),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_8) ).

fof(f35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,u,v),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_sum_9) ).

tcf(c_84,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( sum(X0,X4,X5)
      | ~ sum(X2,X3,X5)
      | ~ sum(X1,X3,X4)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_86,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(additive_identity,X0,X0)
      | ~ defined(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_87,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(additive_inverse(X0),X0,additive_identity)
      | ~ defined(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_88,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( sum(X1,X0,X2)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_110,plain,
    defined(a),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_111,plain,
    defined(u),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_112,plain,
    defined(v),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_115,negated_conjecture,
    sum(a,u,q),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

tcf(c_116,negated_conjecture,
    sum(a,v,r),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

tcf(c_117,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_identity,q,r),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

tcf(c_118,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,u,v),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

tcf(c_309,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( sum(additive_identity,u,v)
      | ~ sum(additive_identity,X0,X2)
      | ~ sum(X2,X1,v)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,u) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_84]) ).

tcf(c_341,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( sum(X0,X4,u)
      | ~ sum(X2,X3,u)
      | ~ sum(X1,X3,X4)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_84]) ).

tcf(c_343,plain,
    ( sum(additive_identity,u,u)
    | ~ defined(u) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_86]) ).

tcf(c_344,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( sum(X1,X0,u)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,u) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_88]) ).

tcf(c_351,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( sum(X0,X4,v)
      | ~ sum(X2,X3,v)
      | ~ sum(X1,X3,X4)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_84]) ).

tcf(c_353,plain,
    ( sum(additive_identity,v,v)
    | ~ defined(v) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_86]) ).

tcf(c_354,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( sum(X1,X0,v)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,v) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_88]) ).

tcf(c_602,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( sum(X0,X2,u)
      | ~ sum(additive_identity,u,u)
      | ~ sum(X1,u,X2)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,additive_identity) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_341]) ).

tcf(c_621,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( sum(X0,X2,v)
      | ~ sum(additive_identity,v,v)
      | ~ sum(X1,v,X2)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,additive_identity) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_351]) ).

tcf(c_2466,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(X0,q,u)
      | ~ sum(additive_identity,u,u)
      | ~ sum(a,u,q)
      | ~ sum(X0,a,additive_identity) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_602]) ).

tcf(c_2498,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(X0,r,v)
      | ~ sum(additive_identity,v,v)
      | ~ sum(a,v,r)
      | ~ sum(X0,a,additive_identity) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_621]) ).

tcf(c_9779,plain,
    ( sum(additive_inverse(a),q,u)
    | ~ sum(additive_identity,u,u)
    | ~ sum(a,u,q)
    | ~ sum(additive_inverse(a),a,additive_identity) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_2466]) ).

tcf(c_9780,plain,
    ( sum(additive_inverse(a),a,additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(a) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_87]) ).

tcf(c_21882,plain,
    ( sum(q,additive_inverse(a),u)
    | ~ sum(additive_inverse(a),q,u) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_344]) ).

tcf(c_22250,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(r,X0,v)
      | ~ sum(X0,r,v) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_354]) ).

tcf(c_34431,plain,
    ( sum(additive_inverse(a),r,v)
    | ~ sum(additive_identity,v,v)
    | ~ sum(a,v,r)
    | ~ sum(additive_inverse(a),a,additive_identity) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_2498]) ).

tcf(c_38164,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(additive_identity,u,v)
      | ~ sum(additive_identity,q,X0)
      | ~ sum(q,additive_inverse(a),u)
      | ~ sum(X0,additive_inverse(a),v) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_309]) ).

tcf(c_41048,plain,
    ( sum(r,additive_inverse(a),v)
    | ~ sum(additive_inverse(a),r,v) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_22250]) ).

tcf(c_42020,plain,
    ( sum(additive_identity,u,v)
    | ~ sum(additive_identity,q,r)
    | ~ sum(r,additive_inverse(a),v)
    | ~ sum(q,additive_inverse(a),u) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_38164]) ).

tcf(c_42021,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_42020,c_41048,c_34431,c_21882,c_9780,c_9779,c_353,c_343,c_118,c_115,c_116,c_117,c_110,c_111,c_112]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : FLD016-5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 10:41:34 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.41  % Proving...
% 13.90/2.82  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 13.90/2.82  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  % ------  iProver source info
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 13.90/2.82  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 13.90/2.82  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 13.90/2.82  % ------ Proving...
% 13.90/2.82  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  % 
% 13.90/2.82  % clauses                               35
% 13.90/2.82  % conjectures                           4
% 13.90/2.82  % EPR                                   27
% 13.90/2.82  % Horn                                  32
% 13.90/2.82  % unary                                 12
% 13.90/2.82  % binary                                6
% 13.90/2.82  % lits                                  86
% 13.90/2.82  % lits eq                               0
% 13.90/2.82  % fd_pure                               0
% 13.90/2.82  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 13.90/2.82  % fd_cond                               0
% 13.90/2.82  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 13.90/2.82  % AC symbols                            0
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  % ------ 
% 13.90/2.82  % Current options:
% 13.90/2.82  % ------ 
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  % 
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  % ------ Proving...
% 13.90/2.82  % 
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 13.90/2.82  
% 13.90/2.82  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------