↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : FLD019-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 05:55:14 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 58.63s 58.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 58.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10  % Problem    : FLD019-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.10  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Wed Jun 19 11:04:09 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.52  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 58.63/58.71  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.63/58.71  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 58.63/58.71  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 58.63/58.71  % Transform   :cnf
% 58.63/58.71  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 58.63/58.71  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 58.63/58.71  
% 58.63/58.71  % Result      :Theorem 58.080000s
% 58.63/58.71  % Output      :CNFRefutation 58.080000s
% 58.63/58.71  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.63/58.72  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.63/58.72  % File     : FLD019-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 58.63/58.72  % Domain   : Field Theory (Ordered fields)
% 58.63/58.72  % Problem  : If the additive inverse of a is zero, a itself is zero
% 58.63/58.72  % Version  : [Dra93] axioms : Especial.
% 58.63/58.72  %            Theorem formulation : Functional with re axiom set.
% 58.63/58.72  % English  :
% 58.63/58.72  
% 58.63/58.72  % Refs     : [Dra93] Draeger (1993), Anwendung des Theorembeweisers SETHEO
% 58.63/58.72  % Source   : [Dra93]
% 58.63/58.72  % Names    :
% 58.63/58.72  
% 58.63/58.72  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 58.63/58.72  % Rating   : 0.00 v2.1.0
% 58.63/58.72  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (   6 unt;   3 nHn;  29 RR)
% 58.63/58.72  %            Number of literals    :   80 (   0 equ;  50 neg)
% 58.63/58.72  %            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
% 58.63/58.72  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 58.63/58.72  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 58.63/58.72  %            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
% 58.63/58.72  %            Number of variables   :   73 (   0 sgn)
% 58.63/58.72  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 58.63/58.72  
% 58.63/58.72  % Comments :
% 58.63/58.72  % Bugfixes : v2.1.0 - Bugfix in FLD002-0.ax
% 58.63/58.72  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.63/58.72  include('Axioms/FLD002-0.ax').
% 58.63/58.72  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.63/58.72  cnf(a_is_defined,hypothesis,
% 58.63/58.72      defined(a) ).
% 58.63/58.72  
% 58.63/58.72  cnf(sum_2,negated_conjecture,
% 58.63/58.72      sum(additive_identity,additive_inverse(a),additive_identity) ).
% 58.63/58.72  
% 58.63/58.72  cnf(not_sum_3,negated_conjecture,
% 58.63/58.72      ~ sum(additive_identity,a,additive_identity) ).
% 58.63/58.72  
% 58.63/58.72  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.63/58.72  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.63/58.72  % Proof found
% 58.63/58.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 58.63/58.72  % SZS output start Proof
% 58.63/58.73  %ClaNum:29(EqnAxiom:0)
% 58.63/58.73  %VarNum:162(SingletonVarNum:73)
% 58.63/58.73  %MaxLitNum:5
% 58.63/58.73  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 58.63/58.73  %SharedTerms:10
% 58.63/58.73  %goalClause: 4 6
% 58.63/58.73  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 58.63/58.73  [1]P1(a1)
% 58.63/58.73  [2]P1(a4)
% 58.63/58.73  [3]P1(a2)
% 58.63/58.73  [5]~P2(a1,a1,a4)
% 58.63/58.73  [6]~P2(a1,a2,a1)
% 58.63/58.73  [4]P2(a1,f5(a2),a1)
% 58.63/58.73  [12]~P1(x121)+P2(a1,x121,x121)
% 58.63/58.73  [13]~P1(x131)+P4(a4,x131,x131)
% 58.63/58.73  [7]~P1(x71)+P1(f5(x71))
% 58.63/58.73  [14]~P1(x141)+P2(f5(x141),x141,a1)
% 58.63/58.73  [21]~P2(x212,x211,x213)+P2(x211,x212,x213)
% 58.63/58.73  [22]~P4(x222,x221,x223)+P4(x221,x222,x223)
% 58.63/58.73  [15]~P1(x151)+P2(a1,x151,a1)+P1(f7(x151))
% 58.63/58.73  [19]~P1(x191)+P4(f7(x191),x191,a4)+P2(a1,x191,a1)
% 58.63/58.73  [18]~P3(x182,x181)+~P3(x181,x182)+P2(a1,x181,x182)
% 58.63/58.73  [9]~P1(x92)+~P1(x91)+P1(f3(x91,x92))
% 58.63/58.73  [10]~P1(x102)+~P1(x101)+P1(f6(x101,x102))
% 58.63/58.73  [16]~P1(x162)+~P1(x161)+P2(x161,x162,f3(x161,x162))
% 58.63/58.73  [17]~P1(x172)+~P1(x171)+P4(x171,x172,f6(x171,x172))
% 58.63/58.73  [11]~P3(x111,x113)+P3(x111,x112)+~P3(x113,x112)
% 58.63/58.73  [8]P3(x82,x81)+~P1(x81)+~P1(x82)+P3(x81,x82)
% 58.63/58.73  [20]~P4(x203,x202,x201)+P3(a1,x201)+~P3(a1,x202)+~P3(a1,x203)
% 58.63/58.73  [23]~P2(x233,x235,x231)+P3(x231,x232)+~P2(x234,x235,x232)+~P3(x233,x234)
% 58.63/58.73  [24]~P2(x241,x246,x244)+P2(x241,x242,x243)+~P2(x244,x245,x243)+~P2(x246,x245,x242)
% 58.63/58.73  [25]~P2(x256,x254,x251)+P2(x251,x252,x253)+~P2(x254,x252,x255)+~P2(x256,x255,x253)
% 58.63/58.73  [26]~P4(x261,x266,x264)+P4(x261,x262,x263)+~P4(x264,x265,x263)+~P4(x266,x265,x262)
% 58.63/58.73  [27]~P4(x276,x274,x271)+P4(x271,x272,x273)+~P4(x274,x272,x275)+~P4(x276,x275,x273)
% 58.63/58.73  [28]~P4(x285,x287,x282)+~P4(x284,x287,x281)+P2(x281,x282,x283)+~P2(x284,x285,x286)+~P4(x286,x287,x283)
% 58.63/58.73  [29]~P4(x297,x292,x295)+~P4(x296,x292,x294)+P4(x291,x292,x293)+~P2(x294,x295,x293)+~P2(x296,x297,x291)
% 58.63/58.73  %EqnAxiom
% 58.63/58.73  
% 58.63/58.73  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(34,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (P3(a1,a1)),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,6,1,21,25,8])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(50,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (P3(a2,a2)),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,8])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(82,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (P2(a1,f5(a4),f5(a4))),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,12,7])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(102,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (P4(a4,f5(a4),f5(a4))),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,13,7])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(171,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (P2(f5(f5(a4)),f5(a4),a1)),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,14,7])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(172,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (~P2(f5(a4),a2,f5(a4))),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,171,25])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(174,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (~P2(a2,f5(a4),f5(a4))),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,171,25,21])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(692,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (~P2(a1,a1,a2)),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[174,82,25])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(3646,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (P2(f5(a4),a1,f5(a4))),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[82,21])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(3757,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (P4(f5(a4),a4,f5(a4))),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[102,22])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(4004,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (~P4(a1,a4,a2)),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[172,3646,3757,28])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(7895,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (P2(a1,a4,a4)),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,7,13,14,12])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(7899,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (P1(f3(a4,a4))),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,7,13,14,12,21,9])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(7901,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (P1(f6(a4,a4))),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,7,13,14,12,21,9,10])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(7909,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (P2(a4,a4,f3(a4,a4))),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,3,6,7,13,14,12,21,9,10,17,15,19,16])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(7917,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (P4(a2,f7(a2),a4)),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[4004,2,34,3,3757,6,7,13,14,12,21,9,10,17,15,19,16,18,25,29,22])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(7932,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (P2(f5(a2),a2,a1)),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,7,14])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(7942,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (P1(f3(a2,a2))),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[7895,7899,3,7,14,13,12,21,22,9])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(7950,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (P2(a1,a2,a2)),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[7895,7899,3,50,7,14,13,12,21,22,9,10,17,16,18])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(7956,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     (P4(f3(a2,a2),f7(a2),f3(a4,a4))),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[7895,7899,7909,7917,3,6,50,7,14,13,12,21,22,9,10,17,16,18,24,25,29])).
% 58.67/58.74  cnf(7999,plain,
% 58.67/58.74     ($false),
% 58.67/58.74     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,7950,7942,7956,7901,7932,34,1,692,7,14,13,12,21,22,9,10,17,16,20,24]),
% 58.67/58.74     ['proof']).
% 58.67/58.74  % SZS output end Proof
% 58.67/58.74  % Total time :58.080000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------