↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : FLD021-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.kLo3mazaP2 true

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:33:11 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.71s 1.70s
% Output   : Refutation 7.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : FLD021-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.kLo3mazaP2 true
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 18:24:53 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.48/0.58  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.48/0.58  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.48/0.58  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.50/0.67  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.50/0.68  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.50/0.69  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.50/0.69  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.50/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.50/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.50/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 7.71/1.70  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 7.71/1.70  % BCE start: 31
% 7.71/1.70  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 7.71/1.70  % PE start: 31
% 7.71/1.70  logic: neq
% 7.71/1.70  % PE eliminated: 0
% 7.71/1.70  % done 954 iterations in 1.006s
% 7.71/1.70  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 7.71/1.70  % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.71/1.70  thf(defined_type, type, defined: $i > $o).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(additive_identity_type, type, additive_identity: $i).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(add_type, type, add: $i > $i > $i).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(m_type, type, m: $i).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(equalish_type, type, equalish: $i > $i > $o).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(existence_of_identity_addition, axiom,
% 7.71/1.70    (( equalish @ ( add @ additive_identity @ X ) @ X ) | ( ~( defined @ X ) ))).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 7.71/1.70      (![X0 : $i]:
% 7.71/1.70         ( (equalish @ (add @ additive_identity @ X0) @ X0) | ~ (defined @ X0))),
% 7.71/1.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [existence_of_identity_addition])).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(compatibility_of_equality_and_addition, axiom,
% 7.71/1.70    (( equalish @ ( add @ X @ Z ) @ ( add @ Y @ Z ) ) | ( ~( defined @ Z ) ) | 
% 7.71/1.70     ( ~( equalish @ X @ Y ) ))).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(zip_derived_cl23, plain,
% 7.71/1.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 7.71/1.70         ( (equalish @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ (add @ X2 @ X1))
% 7.71/1.70          | ~ (defined @ X1)
% 7.71/1.70          | ~ (equalish @ X0 @ X2))),
% 7.71/1.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [compatibility_of_equality_and_addition])).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(transitivity_of_equality, axiom,
% 7.71/1.70    (( equalish @ X @ Z ) | ( ~( equalish @ X @ Y ) ) | 
% 7.71/1.70     ( ~( equalish @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain,
% 7.71/1.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 7.71/1.70         ( (equalish @ X0 @ X1)
% 7.71/1.70          | ~ (equalish @ X0 @ X2)
% 7.71/1.70          | ~ (equalish @ X2 @ X1))),
% 7.71/1.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [transitivity_of_equality])).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(zip_derived_cl156, plain,
% 7.71/1.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 7.71/1.70         (~ (equalish @ X2 @ X1)
% 7.71/1.70          | ~ (defined @ X0)
% 7.71/1.70          |  (equalish @ (add @ X2 @ X0) @ X3)
% 7.71/1.70          | ~ (equalish @ (add @ X1 @ X0) @ X3))),
% 7.71/1.70      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl23, zip_derived_cl22])).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(zip_derived_cl5031, plain,
% 7.71/1.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 7.71/1.70         (~ (defined @ X0)
% 7.71/1.70          | ~ (equalish @ X1 @ additive_identity)
% 7.71/1.70          | ~ (defined @ X0)
% 7.71/1.70          |  (equalish @ (add @ X1 @ X0) @ X0))),
% 7.71/1.70      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl156])).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(zip_derived_cl5115, plain,
% 7.71/1.70      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 7.71/1.70         ( (equalish @ (add @ X1 @ X0) @ X0)
% 7.71/1.70          | ~ (equalish @ X1 @ additive_identity)
% 7.71/1.70          | ~ (defined @ X0))),
% 7.71/1.70      inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5031])).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(add_not_equal_to_a_4, conjecture, (equalish @ ( add @ m @ a ) @ a)).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( equalish @ ( add @ m @ a ) @ a )),
% 7.71/1.70    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [add_not_equal_to_a_4])).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(zip_derived_cl30, plain, (~ (equalish @ (add @ m @ a) @ a)),
% 7.71/1.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(zip_derived_cl5290, plain,
% 7.71/1.70      ((~ (defined @ a) | ~ (equalish @ m @ additive_identity))),
% 7.71/1.70      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5115, zip_derived_cl30])).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(a_is_defined, axiom, (defined @ a)).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain, ( (defined @ a)),
% 7.71/1.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [a_is_defined])).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(m_equals_additive_identity_3, conjecture,
% 7.71/1.70    (~( equalish @ m @ additive_identity ))).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture, (equalish @ m @ additive_identity),
% 7.71/1.70    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [m_equals_additive_identity_3])).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain, ( (equalish @ m @ additive_identity)),
% 7.71/1.70      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 7.71/1.70  thf(zip_derived_cl5335, plain, ($false),
% 7.71/1.70      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 7.71/1.70                [zip_derived_cl5290, zip_derived_cl27, zip_derived_cl29])).
% 7.71/1.70  
% 7.71/1.70  % SZS output end Refutation
% 7.71/1.70  
% 7.71/1.70  
% 7.71/1.70  % Terminating...
% 8.88/1.88  % Runner terminated.
% 8.88/1.89  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------