↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : FLD021-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 05:55:15 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.83s 7.96s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : FLD021-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Wed Jun 19 10:16:54 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 7.83/7.95  %-------------------------------------------
% 7.83/7.95  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 7.83/7.95  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 7.83/7.95  % Transform   :cnf
% 7.83/7.95  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 7.83/7.95  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 7.83/7.95  
% 7.83/7.95  % Result      :Theorem 7.330000s
% 7.83/7.95  % Output      :CNFRefutation 7.330000s
% 7.83/7.95  %-------------------------------------------
% 7.83/7.95  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 7.83/7.95  % File     : FLD021-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 7.83/7.95  % Domain   : Field Theory (Ordered fields)
% 7.83/7.95  % Problem  : Every element equal to zero is an additive identity
% 7.83/7.95  % Version  : [Dra93] axioms : Especial.
% 7.83/7.95  %            Theorem formulation : Functional with re axiom set.
% 7.83/7.95  % English  :
% 7.83/7.95  
% 7.83/7.95  % Refs     : [Dra93] Draeger (1993), Anwendung des Theorembeweisers SETHEO
% 7.83/7.95  % Source   : [Dra93]
% 7.83/7.95  % Names    :
% 7.83/7.95  
% 7.83/7.95  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 7.83/7.95  % Rating   : 0.00 v2.4.0, 0.00 v2.2.1, 0.33 v2.1.0
% 7.83/7.95  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (   7 unt;   3 nHn;  30 RR)
% 7.83/7.95  %            Number of literals    :   81 (   0 equ;  50 neg)
% 7.83/7.95  %            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
% 7.83/7.95  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 7.83/7.95  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 7.83/7.95  %            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
% 7.83/7.95  %            Number of variables   :   73 (   0 sgn)
% 7.83/7.95  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 7.83/7.95  
% 7.83/7.95  % Comments :
% 7.83/7.95  % Bugfixes : v2.1.0 - Bugfix in FLD002-0.ax
% 7.83/7.95  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 7.83/7.95  include('Axioms/FLD002-0.ax').
% 7.83/7.95  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 7.83/7.95  cnf(a_is_defined,hypothesis,
% 7.83/7.95      defined(a) ).
% 7.83/7.95  
% 7.83/7.95  cnf(m_is_defined,hypothesis,
% 7.83/7.95      defined(m) ).
% 7.83/7.95  
% 7.83/7.95  cnf(sum_3,negated_conjecture,
% 7.83/7.95      sum(additive_identity,m,additive_identity) ).
% 7.83/7.95  
% 7.83/7.95  cnf(not_sum_4,negated_conjecture,
% 7.83/7.95      ~ sum(m,a,a) ).
% 7.83/7.95  
% 7.83/7.95  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 7.83/7.96  %-------------------------------------------
% 7.83/7.96  % Proof found
% 7.83/7.96  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 7.83/7.96  % SZS output start Proof
% 7.83/7.96  %ClaNum:30(EqnAxiom:0)
% 7.83/7.96  %VarNum:162(SingletonVarNum:73)
% 7.83/7.96  %MaxLitNum:5
% 7.83/7.96  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 7.83/7.96  %SharedTerms:11
% 7.83/7.96  %goalClause: 5 7
% 7.83/7.96  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 7.83/7.96  [1]P1(a1)
% 7.83/7.96  [2]P1(a4)
% 7.83/7.96  [3]P1(a2)
% 7.83/7.96  [4]P1(a5)
% 7.83/7.96  [5]P2(a1,a5,a1)
% 7.83/7.96  [6]~P2(a1,a1,a4)
% 7.83/7.96  [7]~P2(a5,a2,a2)
% 7.83/7.96  [13]~P1(x131)+P2(a1,x131,x131)
% 7.83/7.96  [14]~P1(x141)+P4(a4,x141,x141)
% 7.83/7.96  [8]~P1(x81)+P1(f6(x81))
% 7.83/7.96  [15]~P1(x151)+P2(f6(x151),x151,a1)
% 7.83/7.96  [22]~P2(x222,x221,x223)+P2(x221,x222,x223)
% 7.83/7.96  [23]~P4(x232,x231,x233)+P4(x231,x232,x233)
% 7.83/7.96  [16]~P1(x161)+P2(a1,x161,a1)+P1(f8(x161))
% 7.83/7.96  [20]~P1(x201)+P4(f8(x201),x201,a4)+P2(a1,x201,a1)
% 7.83/7.96  [19]~P3(x192,x191)+~P3(x191,x192)+P2(a1,x191,x192)
% 7.83/7.96  [10]~P1(x102)+~P1(x101)+P1(f3(x101,x102))
% 7.83/7.96  [11]~P1(x112)+~P1(x111)+P1(f7(x111,x112))
% 7.83/7.96  [17]~P1(x172)+~P1(x171)+P2(x171,x172,f3(x171,x172))
% 7.83/7.96  [18]~P1(x182)+~P1(x181)+P4(x181,x182,f7(x181,x182))
% 7.83/7.96  [12]~P3(x121,x123)+P3(x121,x122)+~P3(x123,x122)
% 7.83/7.96  [9]P3(x92,x91)+~P1(x91)+~P1(x92)+P3(x91,x92)
% 7.83/7.96  [21]~P4(x213,x212,x211)+P3(a1,x211)+~P3(a1,x212)+~P3(a1,x213)
% 7.83/7.96  [24]~P2(x243,x245,x241)+P3(x241,x242)+~P2(x244,x245,x242)+~P3(x243,x244)
% 7.83/7.96  [25]~P2(x251,x256,x254)+P2(x251,x252,x253)+~P2(x254,x255,x253)+~P2(x256,x255,x252)
% 7.83/7.96  [26]~P2(x266,x264,x261)+P2(x261,x262,x263)+~P2(x264,x262,x265)+~P2(x266,x265,x263)
% 7.83/7.96  [27]~P4(x271,x276,x274)+P4(x271,x272,x273)+~P4(x274,x275,x273)+~P4(x276,x275,x272)
% 7.83/7.96  [28]~P4(x286,x284,x281)+P4(x281,x282,x283)+~P4(x284,x282,x285)+~P4(x286,x285,x283)
% 7.83/7.96  [29]~P4(x295,x297,x292)+~P4(x294,x297,x291)+P2(x291,x292,x293)+~P2(x294,x295,x296)+~P4(x296,x297,x293)
% 7.83/7.96  [30]~P4(x307,x302,x305)+~P4(x306,x302,x304)+P4(x301,x302,x303)+~P2(x304,x305,x303)+~P2(x306,x307,x301)
% 7.83/7.96  %EqnAxiom
% 7.83/7.96  
% 7.83/7.96  %-------------------------------------------
% 7.83/7.96  cnf(31,plain,
% 7.83/7.96     (~P2(a2,a5,a2)),
% 7.83/7.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,22])).
% 7.83/7.96  cnf(3561,plain,
% 7.83/7.96     (~P2(x35611,a1,a2)),
% 7.83/7.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,31,26])).
% 7.83/7.96  cnf(3566,plain,
% 7.83/7.96     ($false),
% 7.83/7.96     inference(scs_inference,[],[3561,3,22,13]),
% 7.83/7.96     ['proof']).
% 7.83/7.96  % SZS output end Proof
% 7.83/7.96  % Total time :7.330000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------