↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : FLD021-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:15:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.16s 1.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   44 (  23   ~;  21   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn  25   !;   0   ?;  15   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ sum(X4,X5,X2)
      | ~ sum(X3,X5,X1)
      | ~ sum(X0,X3,X4)
      | sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',associativity_addition_1) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ defined(X0)
      | sum(additive_identity,X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_identity_addition) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sum(X1,X0,X2)
      | sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',commutativity_addition) ).

fof(f27,axiom,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

fof(f29,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_identity,m,additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_3) ).

fof(f30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(m,a,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_sum_4) ).

tcf(c_79,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( sum(X0,X4,X5)
      | ~ sum(X2,X3,X5)
      | ~ sum(X1,X3,X4)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_81,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(additive_identity,X0,X0)
      | ~ defined(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_83,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( sum(X1,X0,X2)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_105,plain,
    defined(a),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_107,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_identity,m,additive_identity),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_108,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(m,a,a),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

tcf(c_286,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( sum(m,a,a)
      | ~ sum(m,X0,X2)
      | ~ sum(X2,X1,a)
      | ~ sum(X0,X1,a) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_79]) ).

tcf(c_314,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(m,a,a)
      | ~ sum(additive_identity,a,a)
      | ~ sum(m,additive_identity,X0)
      | ~ sum(X0,a,a) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_286]) ).

tcf(c_315,plain,
    ( sum(additive_identity,a,a)
    | ~ defined(a) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_81]) ).

tcf(c_316,plain,
    ( sum(m,a,a)
    | ~ sum(additive_identity,a,a)
    | ~ sum(m,additive_identity,additive_identity) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_314]) ).

tcf(c_448,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(m,additive_identity,X0)
      | ~ sum(additive_identity,m,X0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_83]) ).

tcf(c_449,plain,
    ( sum(m,additive_identity,additive_identity)
    | ~ sum(additive_identity,m,additive_identity) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_448]) ).

tcf(c_450,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_449,c_315,c_316,c_108,c_107,c_105]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : FLD021-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 10:40:13 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.42  % Proving...
% 2.16/1.26  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.16/1.26  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.16/1.26  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.16/1.26  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 2.16/1.26  % ------ Proving...
% 2.16/1.26  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  % 
% 2.16/1.26  % clauses                               30
% 2.16/1.26  % conjectures                           2
% 2.16/1.26  % EPR                                   22
% 2.16/1.26  % Horn                                  27
% 2.16/1.26  % unary                                 7
% 2.16/1.26  % binary                                6
% 2.16/1.26  % lits                                  81
% 2.16/1.26  % lits eq                               0
% 2.16/1.26  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.16/1.26  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.16/1.26  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.16/1.26  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 2.16/1.26  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  % ------ 
% 2.16/1.26  % Current options:
% 2.16/1.26  % ------ 
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  % 
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  % ------ Proving...
% 2.16/1.26  % 
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.16/1.26  
% 2.16/1.26  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------