↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : FLD023-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:49:35 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.26s
% Output   : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  11 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   61 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   57 (  28   ~;  28   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   0 sgn  23   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( equalish(add(X0,additive_inverse(X0)),additive_identity)
      | ~ defined(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',existence_of_inverse_addition) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( defined(additive_inverse(X0))
      | ~ defined(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',well_definedness_of_additive_inverse) ).

fof(f22,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( equalish(X0,X1)
      | ~ equalish(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',symmetry_of_equality) ).

fof(f23,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( equalish(X0,X1)
      | ~ equalish(X0,X2)
      | ~ equalish(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',transitivity_of_equality) ).

fof(f24,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( equalish(add(X0,X1),add(X2,X1))
      | ~ defined(X1)
      | ~ equalish(X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',compatibility_of_equality_and_addition) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

fof(f30,negated_conjecture,
    equalish(a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_equals_b_3) ).

fof(f31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(additive_identity,add(b,additive_inverse(a))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',additive_identity_not_equal_to_add_4) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ equalish(add(X0,additive_inverse(X0)),additive_identity)
      | ~ defined(X0) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ equalish(X0,X1)
      | equalish(X1,X0) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ equalish(X0,X1)
      | equalish(X0,X2)
      | equalish(X2,X1) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ equalish(add(X0,X1),add(X2,X1))
      | ~ defined(X1)
      | equalish(X0,X2) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ~ equalish(a,b),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    equalish(additive_identity,add(b,additive_inverse(a))),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( equalish(X0,add(b,additive_inverse(a)))
      | equalish(additive_identity,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f49,f55]) ).

fof(f116,definition,
    ( spl0_7
  <=> defined(additive_inverse(a)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl0_7])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    ( defined(additive_inverse(a))
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f116]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    ( ~ defined(additive_inverse(a))
    | spl0_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f116]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ( ~ defined(a)
    | spl0_7 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f118,f12]) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl0_7 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f124,f28]) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    spl0_7,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f125]) ).

fof(f157,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ defined(additive_inverse(a))
      | equalish(X0,b)
      | equalish(additive_identity,add(X0,additive_inverse(a))) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f50,f93]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( equalish(additive_identity,add(X0,additive_inverse(a)))
        | equalish(X0,b) )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f157,f117]) ).

fof(f231,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( equalish(add(X0,additive_inverse(a)),additive_identity)
        | equalish(X0,b) )
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f158,f48]) ).

fof(f561,plain,
    ( equalish(a,b)
    | ~ defined(a)
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f231,f34]) ).

fof(f566,plain,
    ( ~ defined(a)
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f561,f54]) ).

fof(f567,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_7 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f566,f28]) ).

fof(f568,plain,
    ~ spl0_7,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f567]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    spl0_7,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f126]) ).

cnf(s44,plain,
    ~ spl0_7,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f568]) ).

cnf(s45,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s8,s44]) ).

fof(f569,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s45]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : FLD023-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.05/0.17  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.05/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.05/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.05/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.05/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.05/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 00:26:48 UTC 2026
% 0.05/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.05/0.17  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.05/0.20  Running first-order model finding
% 0.05/0.21  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179893)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179898)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=1886085206_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.17/0.26  % TRYING [1]
% 0.17/0.26  % TRYING [2]
% 0.17/0.26  % TRYING [3]
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179899)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.17/0.26  % TRYING [4]
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179902)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=3210498674:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179899)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=2262856248:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179900)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=1569791913:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179903)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=81723751:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179901)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=4185271484:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179904)ott-3_16_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=arity:fd=off:rp=on:random_seed=227560170:i=159:bs=unit_only:nicw=on:fsr=off:amm=off_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/159Mi)
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179899) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2179893-2179899"...
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179899)...printing done.
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179899)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.17/0.26  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.26  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179899)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179899)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179899)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179899)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179899)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179899)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179899)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179899)Instructions burned: 11 (million)
% 0.17/0.26  % (2179893)Success in time 0.049 s
% 0.17/0.26  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------