%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : FLD023-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.C5zC1jmMBr true
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:33:11 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 13.93s 2.59s
% Output : Refutation 13.93s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14 % Problem : FLD023-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.15 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.C5zC1jmMBr true
% 0.14/0.37 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 18:28:08 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.37 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.37 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.37 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.37 % Running in FO mode
% 0.52/0.62 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.52/0.62 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.52/0.62 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.52/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.52/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.52/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.52/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.52/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.52/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.52/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 13.93/2.59 % Solved by fo/fo1_av.sh.
% 13.93/2.59 % done 2205 iterations in 1.811s
% 13.93/2.59 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 13.93/2.59 % SZS output start Refutation
% 13.93/2.59 thf(defined_type, type, defined: $i > $o).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(additive_identity_type, type, additive_identity: $i).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(add_type, type, add: $i > $i > $i).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(equalish_type, type, equalish: $i > $i > $o).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(additive_inverse_type, type, additive_inverse: $i > $i).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(existence_of_inverse_addition, axiom,
% 13.93/2.59 (( equalish @ ( add @ X @ ( additive_inverse @ X ) ) @ additive_identity ) |
% 13.93/2.59 ( ~( defined @ X ) ))).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 13.93/2.59 (![X0 : $i]:
% 13.93/2.59 ( (equalish @ (add @ X0 @ (additive_inverse @ X0)) @ additive_identity)
% 13.93/2.59 | ~ (defined @ X0))),
% 13.93/2.59 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [existence_of_inverse_addition])).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(symmetry_of_equality, axiom,
% 13.93/2.59 (( equalish @ X @ Y ) | ( ~( equalish @ Y @ X ) ))).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain,
% 13.93/2.59 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (equalish @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (equalish @ X1 @ X0))),
% 13.93/2.59 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_equality])).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain,
% 13.93/2.59 (![X0 : $i]:
% 13.93/2.59 (~ (defined @ X0)
% 13.93/2.59 | (equalish @ additive_identity @
% 13.93/2.59 (add @ X0 @ (additive_inverse @ X0))))),
% 13.93/2.59 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl21])).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(transitivity_of_equality, axiom,
% 13.93/2.59 (( equalish @ X @ Z ) | ( ~( equalish @ X @ Y ) ) |
% 13.93/2.59 ( ~( equalish @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain,
% 13.93/2.59 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 13.93/2.59 ( (equalish @ X0 @ X1)
% 13.93/2.59 | ~ (equalish @ X0 @ X2)
% 13.93/2.59 | ~ (equalish @ X2 @ X1))),
% 13.93/2.59 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [transitivity_of_equality])).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(zip_derived_cl48, plain,
% 13.93/2.59 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 13.93/2.59 (~ (defined @ X0)
% 13.93/2.59 | (equalish @ additive_identity @ X1)
% 13.93/2.59 | ~ (equalish @ (add @ X0 @ (additive_inverse @ X0)) @ X1))),
% 13.93/2.59 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl38, zip_derived_cl22])).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(compatibility_of_equality_and_addition, axiom,
% 13.93/2.59 (( equalish @ ( add @ X @ Z ) @ ( add @ Y @ Z ) ) | ( ~( defined @ Z ) ) |
% 13.93/2.59 ( ~( equalish @ X @ Y ) ))).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(zip_derived_cl23, plain,
% 13.93/2.59 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 13.93/2.59 ( (equalish @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ (add @ X2 @ X1))
% 13.93/2.59 | ~ (defined @ X1)
% 13.93/2.59 | ~ (equalish @ X0 @ X2))),
% 13.93/2.59 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [compatibility_of_equality_and_addition])).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(zip_derived_cl633, plain,
% 13.93/2.59 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 13.93/2.59 ( (equalish @ additive_identity @ (add @ X1 @ (additive_inverse @ X0)))
% 13.93/2.59 | ~ (defined @ X0)
% 13.93/2.59 | ~ (defined @ (additive_inverse @ X0))
% 13.93/2.59 | ~ (equalish @ X0 @ X1))),
% 13.93/2.59 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl48, zip_derived_cl23])).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(well_definedness_of_additive_inverse, axiom,
% 13.93/2.59 (( defined @ ( additive_inverse @ X ) ) | ( ~( defined @ X ) ))).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 13.93/2.59 (![X0 : $i]: ( (defined @ (additive_inverse @ X0)) | ~ (defined @ X0))),
% 13.93/2.59 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [well_definedness_of_additive_inverse])).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(zip_derived_cl9951, plain,
% 13.93/2.59 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 13.93/2.59 (~ (equalish @ X0 @ X1)
% 13.93/2.59 | ~ (defined @ X0)
% 13.93/2.59 | (equalish @ additive_identity @
% 13.93/2.59 (add @ X1 @ (additive_inverse @ X0))))),
% 13.93/2.59 inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl633, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(additive_identity_not_equal_to_add_4, conjecture,
% 13.93/2.59 (equalish @ additive_identity @ ( add @ b @ ( additive_inverse @ a ) ))).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 13.93/2.59 (~( equalish @ additive_identity @ ( add @ b @ ( additive_inverse @ a ) ) )),
% 13.93/2.59 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [additive_identity_not_equal_to_add_4])).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(zip_derived_cl30, plain,
% 13.93/2.59 (~ (equalish @ additive_identity @ (add @ b @ (additive_inverse @ a)))),
% 13.93/2.59 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(zip_derived_cl9975, plain, ((~ (defined @ a) | ~ (equalish @ a @ b))),
% 13.93/2.59 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9951, zip_derived_cl30])).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(a_is_defined, axiom, (defined @ a)).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain, ( (defined @ a)),
% 13.93/2.59 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [a_is_defined])).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(a_equals_b_3, conjecture, (~( equalish @ a @ b ))).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture, (equalish @ a @ b),
% 13.93/2.59 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [a_equals_b_3])).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain, ( (equalish @ a @ b)),
% 13.93/2.59 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 13.93/2.59 thf(zip_derived_cl9977, plain, ($false),
% 13.93/2.59 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 13.93/2.59 [zip_derived_cl9975, zip_derived_cl27, zip_derived_cl29])).
% 13.93/2.59
% 13.93/2.59 % SZS output end Refutation
% 13.93/2.59
% 13.93/2.59
% 13.93/2.59 % Terminating...
% 14.13/2.65 % Runner terminated.
% 14.13/2.67 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------