↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : FLD025-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:22:43 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   40 (  15 unt;   0 nHn;  40 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   90 (   0 equ;  54 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   76 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(commutativity_multiplication,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X2,X1,X3)
    | product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',commutativity_multiplication) ).

cnf(existence_of_identity_multiplication,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | product(multiplicative_identity,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_identity_multiplication) ).

cnf(associativity_multiplication_2,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X4,X6,X3)
    | ~ product(X5,X2,X6)
    | ~ product(X4,X5,X1)
    | product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',associativity_multiplication_2) ).

cnf(associativity_multiplication_1,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X5,X6,X3)
    | ~ product(X4,X6,X2)
    | ~ product(X1,X4,X5)
    | product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',associativity_multiplication_1) ).

cnf(product_6,negated_conjecture,
    product(multiplicative_identity,c,d),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_6) ).

cnf(totality_of_multiplication,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | product(X1,X2,multiply(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',totality_of_multiplication) ).

cnf(product_5,negated_conjecture,
    product(multiplicative_identity,a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_5) ).

cnf(c_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_is_defined) ).

cnf(not_product_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ product(d,b,multiply(a,c)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_product_7) ).

cnf(a_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

cnf(well_definedness_of_multiplication,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | defined(multiply(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',well_definedness_of_multiplication) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ product(X2,X1,X3)
    | product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[commutativity_multiplication]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | product(multiplicative_identity,X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[existence_of_identity_multiplication]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ product(X4,X6,X3)
    | ~ product(X5,X2,X6)
    | ~ product(X4,X5,X1)
    | product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[associativity_multiplication_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ product(X5,X6,X3)
    | ~ product(X4,X6,X2)
    | ~ product(X1,X4,X5)
    | product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[associativity_multiplication_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ product(X2,X1,X3)
    | product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | product(multiplicative_identity,X1,X1) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ product(X4,X6,X3)
    | ~ product(X5,X2,X6)
    | ~ product(X4,X5,X1)
    | product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    product(multiplicative_identity,c,d),
    product_6 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | product(X1,X2,multiply(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[totality_of_multiplication]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ product(X5,X6,X3)
    | ~ product(X4,X6,X2)
    | ~ product(X1,X4,X5)
    | product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | product(X1,multiplicative_identity,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    product(multiplicative_identity,a,b),
    product_5 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ product(X4,X2,X3)
    | ~ product(X4,multiplicative_identity,X1)
    | product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    product(c,multiplicative_identity,d),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | product(X1,X2,multiply(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X3)
    | ~ product(X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ product(X4,multiplicative_identity,X2)
    | product(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    product(a,multiplicative_identity,b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | ~ product(c,X1,X2)
    | product(d,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | product(X1,X2,multiply(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    defined(c),
    c_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ product(d,b,multiply(a,c)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_product_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ product(X1,a,X2)
    | product(X1,b,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | product(d,X1,multiply(X1,c)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    a_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ product(d,b,multiply(a,c)),
    c_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | defined(multiply(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[well_definedness_of_multiplication]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ defined(multiply(a,c)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34])]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | defined(multiply(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_30]),c_0_34])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : FLD025-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:41:34 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.56  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.21/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.56  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.56  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.56  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3629541 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.56  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.56  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.21/0.56  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.56  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.56  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.56  % Starting H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 296s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 269s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.56  % Starting G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S08BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.56  % H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with pid 3629549 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.56  % Result found by H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S
% 0.21/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.56  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.21/0.56  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.56  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.56  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.56  % Starting H----_102_C18_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 296s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.56  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.56  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  % Proof found!
% 0.21/0.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.56  % Parsed axioms                        : 33
% 0.21/0.56  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.56  % Initial clauses                      : 33
% 0.21/0.56  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.56  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 33
% 0.21/0.56  % Processed clauses                    : 498
% 0.21/0.56  % ...of these trivial                  : 25
% 0.21/0.56  % ...subsumed                          : 112
% 0.21/0.56  % ...remaining for further processing  : 361
% 0.21/0.56  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.56  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.56  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.21/0.56  % Backward-rewritten                   : 9
% 0.21/0.56  % Generated clauses                    : 2360
% 0.21/0.56  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1862
% 0.21/0.56  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.56  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.21/0.56  % Paramodulations                      : 2356
% 0.21/0.56  % Factorizations                       : 4
% 0.21/0.56  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.56  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.56  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.56  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1413
% 0.21/0.56  % ...of those cached                   : 1323
% 0.21/0.56  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.56  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.56  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.56  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.56  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.56  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.56  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.56  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.56  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.56  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.56  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.56  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.56  % Current number of processed clauses  : 318
% 0.21/0.56  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 103
% 0.21/0.56  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.56  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.21/0.56  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 212
% 0.21/0.56  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1430
% 0.21/0.56  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4603
% 0.21/0.56  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.56  % Current number of archived clauses   : 43
% 0.21/0.56  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2700
% 0.21/0.56  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2243
% 0.21/0.56  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 114
% 0.21/0.56  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 307
% 0.21/0.56  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.56  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 50
% 0.21/0.56  % BW rewrite match successes           : 9
% 0.21/0.56  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.56  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.56  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 32497
% 0.21/0.56  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 116
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.56  % User time                : 0.080 s
% 0.21/0.56  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.56  % Total time               : 0.084 s
% 0.21/0.56  % Maximum resident set size: 3660 pages
% 0.21/0.56  
% 0.21/0.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.56  % User time                : 0.309 s
% 0.21/0.56  % System time              : 0.029 s
% 0.21/0.56  % Total time               : 0.338 s
% 0.21/0.56  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.21/0.56  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------