%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : FLD026-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 02:06:04 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 225.13s 28.71s % Output : CNFRefutation 225.13s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.14/0.14 % Problem : FLD026-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0. % 0.14/0.15 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 03:31:10 EDT 2022 % 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime : % 0.14/0.40 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.14/0.40 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN % 0.14/0.40 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.14/0.40 # % 0.14/0.40 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.14/0.40 # Number of axioms: 31 Number of unprocessed: 31 % 0.14/0.40 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.14/0.40 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.14/0.40 # Hello from C++ % 0.14/0.40 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.14/0.40 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.14/0.40 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.14/0.40 # 31 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.14/0.40 # Creating start rules for all 3 conjectures. % 0.14/0.40 # There are 3 start rule candidates: % 0.14/0.40 # Found 8 unit axioms. % 0.14/0.40 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.14/0.40 # 3 start rule tableaux created. % 0.14/0.40 # 23 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.14/0.40 # 8 unit axiom clauses % 0.14/0.40 % 0.14/0.40 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.14/0.40 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 3 % 0.14/0.40 # Returning from population with 12 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.14/0.40 # We now have 12 tableaux to operate on % 225.13/28.71 # There were 39 total branch saturation attempts. % 225.13/28.71 # There were 4 of these attempts blocked. % 225.13/28.71 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 225.13/28.71 # There were 4 free duplicated saturations. % 225.13/28.71 # There were 11 total successful branch saturations. % 225.13/28.71 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 225.13/28.71 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 225.13/28.71 # There were 7 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 225.13/28.71 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 225.13/28.71 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 225.13/28.71 # Begin clausification derivation % 225.13/28.71 % 225.13/28.71 # End clausification derivation % 225.13/28.71 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (defined(additive_identity))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_61, negated_conjecture, (product(multiplicative_identity,a,b))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (defined(multiplicative_identity))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_58, hypothesis, (defined(a))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_59, hypothesis, (defined(b))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_57, plain, (~sum(additive_identity,additive_identity,multiplicative_identity))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_60, negated_conjecture, (~sum(additive_identity,a,additive_identity))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_62, negated_conjecture, (~product(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_inverse(a),multiplicative_inverse(b)))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (defined(additive_inverse(X1))|~defined(X1))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (sum(additive_identity,X1,X1)|~defined(X1))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (product(multiplicative_identity,X1,X1)|~defined(X1))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (defined(multiplicative_inverse(X1))|sum(additive_identity,X1,additive_identity)|~defined(X1))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (sum(additive_inverse(X1),X1,additive_identity)|~defined(X1))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (product(multiplicative_inverse(X1),X1,multiplicative_identity)|sum(additive_identity,X1,additive_identity)|~defined(X1))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~sum(X2,X1,X3))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X2,X1,X3))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (less_or_equal(X1,X2)|less_or_equal(X2,X1)|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (defined(add(X1,X2))|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (defined(multiply(X1,X2))|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_52, plain, (sum(additive_identity,X1,X2)|~less_or_equal(X2,X1)|~less_or_equal(X1,X2))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (less_or_equal(X1,X2)|~less_or_equal(X3,X2)|~less_or_equal(X1,X3))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (sum(X1,X2,add(X1,X2))|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (product(X1,X2,multiply(X1,X2))|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (less_or_equal(additive_identity,X1)|~less_or_equal(additive_identity,X2)|~less_or_equal(additive_identity,X3)|~product(X3,X2,X1))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_55, plain, (less_or_equal(X1,X2)|~less_or_equal(X3,X4)|~sum(X4,X5,X2)|~sum(X3,X5,X1))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~sum(X4,X5,X3)|~sum(X6,X5,X2)|~sum(X1,X6,X4))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~sum(X4,X2,X5)|~sum(X6,X5,X3)|~sum(X6,X4,X1))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X5,X2)|~product(X1,X6,X4))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X2,X5)|~product(X6,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X4,X1))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (sum(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X5,X3)|~product(X6,X5,X2)|~product(X7,X5,X1)|~sum(X7,X6,X4))). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (product(X1,X2,X3)|~product(X4,X2,X5)|~product(X6,X2,X7)|~sum(X7,X5,X3)|~sum(X6,X4,X1))). % 225.13/28.71 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 225.13/28.71 # Begin printing tableau % 225.13/28.71 # Found 11 steps % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_60, negated_conjecture, (~sum(additive_identity,a,additive_identity)), inference(start_rule)). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (~sum(additive_identity,a,additive_identity)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_40])). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_153, plain, (~defined(a)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_58])). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_151, plain, (product(multiplicative_inverse(a),a,multiplicative_identity)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_42])). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_1221815, plain, (~product(multiplicative_identity,a,b)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_1221817, plain, (~product(multiplicative_identity,a,b)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_1221814, plain, (sum(b,multiplicative_identity,b)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_1221814, ...])). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_1221818, plain, (~sum(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_inverse(a),multiplicative_identity)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_32])). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_1291110, plain, (~sum(additive_identity,multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_identity)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_1240520])). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_1291112, plain, (~sum(multiplicative_identity,additive_inverse(multiplicative_identity),additive_identity)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_1240670])). % 225.13/28.71 cnf(i_0_1291111, plain, (~sum(additive_inverse(multiplicative_identity),multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_inverse(a))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_1291111, ...])). % 225.13/28.71 # End printing tableau % 225.13/28.71 # SZS output end % 225.13/28.71 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 225.13/28.71 # Child (9636) has found a proof. % 225.13/28.71 % 225.13/28.71 # Proof search is over... % 225.13/28.71 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------