↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : FLD030-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 05:55:19 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.13s 1.22s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : FLD030-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Wed Jun 19 11:47:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.53/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 1.13/1.21  %-------------------------------------------
% 1.13/1.21  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 1.13/1.21  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 1.13/1.21  % Transform   :cnf
% 1.13/1.21  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 1.13/1.21  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 1.13/1.21  
% 1.13/1.21  % Result      :Theorem 0.600000s
% 1.13/1.21  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.600000s
% 1.13/1.21  %-------------------------------------------
% 1.13/1.21  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.13/1.21  % File     : FLD030-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 1.13/1.21  % Domain   : Field Theory (Ordered fields)
% 1.13/1.21  % Problem  : Compatibility of multiplication and equality relation
% 1.13/1.21  % Version  : [Dra93] axioms : Especial.
% 1.13/1.21  %            Theorem formulation : Functional with re axiom set.
% 1.13/1.21  % English  :
% 1.13/1.21  
% 1.13/1.21  % Refs     : [Dra93] Draeger (1993), Anwendung des Theorembeweisers SETHEO
% 1.13/1.21  % Source   : [Dra93]
% 1.13/1.22  % Names    :
% 1.13/1.22  
% 1.13/1.22  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 1.13/1.22  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.07 v4.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.1, 0.20 v4.0.0, 0.14 v3.4.0, 0.25 v3.3.0, 0.33 v3.1.0, 0.17 v2.7.0, 0.00 v2.6.0, 0.33 v2.5.0, 0.00 v2.4.0, 0.00 v2.2.1, 0.33 v2.1.0
% 1.13/1.22  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   31 (   8 unt;   3 nHn;  31 RR)
% 1.13/1.22  %            Number of literals    :   82 (   0 equ;  50 neg)
% 1.13/1.22  %            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
% 1.13/1.22  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 1.13/1.22  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 1.13/1.22  %            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
% 1.13/1.22  %            Number of variables   :   73 (   0 sgn)
% 1.13/1.22  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 1.13/1.22  
% 1.13/1.22  % Comments :
% 1.13/1.22  % Bugfixes : v2.1.0 - Bugfix in FLD002-0.ax
% 1.13/1.22  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.13/1.22  include('Axioms/FLD002-0.ax').
% 1.13/1.22  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.13/1.22  cnf(a_is_defined,hypothesis,
% 1.13/1.22      defined(a) ).
% 1.13/1.22  
% 1.13/1.22  cnf(b_is_defined,hypothesis,
% 1.13/1.22      defined(b) ).
% 1.13/1.22  
% 1.13/1.22  cnf(d_is_defined,hypothesis,
% 1.13/1.22      defined(d) ).
% 1.13/1.22  
% 1.13/1.22  cnf(product_4,negated_conjecture,
% 1.13/1.22      product(multiplicative_identity,a,d) ).
% 1.13/1.22  
% 1.13/1.22  cnf(not_product_5,negated_conjecture,
% 1.13/1.22      ~ product(d,b,multiply(a,b)) ).
% 1.13/1.22  
% 1.13/1.22  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.13/1.22  %-------------------------------------------
% 1.13/1.22  % Proof found
% 1.13/1.22  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.13/1.22  % SZS output start Proof
% 1.13/1.22  %ClaNum:31(EqnAxiom:0)
% 1.13/1.22  %VarNum:162(SingletonVarNum:73)
% 1.13/1.22  %MaxLitNum:5
% 1.13/1.22  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 1.13/1.22  %SharedTerms:14
% 1.13/1.22  %goalClause: 6 8
% 1.13/1.22  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 1.13/1.22  [1]P1(a1)
% 1.13/1.22  [2]P1(a4)
% 1.13/1.22  [3]P1(a2)
% 1.13/1.22  [4]P1(a5)
% 1.13/1.22  [5]P1(a7)
% 1.13/1.22  [6]P2(a4,a2,a7)
% 1.13/1.22  [7]~P4(a1,a1,a4)
% 1.13/1.22  [8]~P2(a7,a5,f8(a2,a5))
% 1.13/1.22  [14]~P1(x141)+P4(a1,x141,x141)
% 1.13/1.22  [15]~P1(x151)+P2(a4,x151,x151)
% 1.13/1.22  [9]~P1(x91)+P1(f6(x91))
% 1.13/1.22  [16]~P1(x161)+P4(f6(x161),x161,a1)
% 1.13/1.22  [23]~P4(x232,x231,x233)+P4(x231,x232,x233)
% 1.13/1.22  [24]~P2(x242,x241,x243)+P2(x241,x242,x243)
% 1.13/1.22  [17]~P1(x171)+P4(a1,x171,a1)+P1(f9(x171))
% 1.13/1.22  [21]~P1(x211)+P2(f9(x211),x211,a4)+P4(a1,x211,a1)
% 1.13/1.22  [20]~P3(x202,x201)+~P3(x201,x202)+P4(a1,x201,x202)
% 1.13/1.22  [11]~P1(x112)+~P1(x111)+P1(f3(x111,x112))
% 1.13/1.22  [12]~P1(x122)+~P1(x121)+P1(f8(x121,x122))
% 1.13/1.22  [18]~P1(x182)+~P1(x181)+P4(x181,x182,f3(x181,x182))
% 1.13/1.22  [19]~P1(x192)+~P1(x191)+P2(x191,x192,f8(x191,x192))
% 1.13/1.22  [13]~P3(x131,x133)+P3(x131,x132)+~P3(x133,x132)
% 1.13/1.22  [10]P3(x102,x101)+~P1(x101)+~P1(x102)+P3(x101,x102)
% 1.13/1.22  [22]~P2(x223,x222,x221)+P3(a1,x221)+~P3(a1,x222)+~P3(a1,x223)
% 1.13/1.22  [25]~P4(x253,x255,x251)+P3(x251,x252)+~P4(x254,x255,x252)+~P3(x253,x254)
% 1.13/1.22  [26]~P4(x261,x266,x264)+P4(x261,x262,x263)+~P4(x264,x265,x263)+~P4(x266,x265,x262)
% 1.13/1.22  [27]~P4(x276,x274,x271)+P4(x271,x272,x273)+~P4(x274,x272,x275)+~P4(x276,x275,x273)
% 1.13/1.22  [28]~P2(x281,x286,x284)+P2(x281,x282,x283)+~P2(x284,x285,x283)+~P2(x286,x285,x282)
% 1.13/1.22  [29]~P2(x296,x294,x291)+P2(x291,x292,x293)+~P2(x294,x292,x295)+~P2(x296,x295,x293)
% 1.13/1.22  [30]~P2(x305,x307,x302)+~P2(x304,x307,x301)+P4(x301,x302,x303)+~P4(x304,x305,x306)+~P2(x306,x307,x303)
% 1.13/1.22  [31]~P2(x317,x312,x315)+~P2(x316,x312,x314)+P2(x311,x312,x313)+~P4(x314,x315,x313)+~P4(x316,x317,x311)
% 1.13/1.22  %EqnAxiom
% 1.13/1.22  
% 1.13/1.22  %-------------------------------------------
% 1.13/1.22  cnf(32,plain,
% 1.13/1.22     (~P2(a5,a7,f8(a2,a5))),
% 1.13/1.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,24])).
% 1.13/1.22  cnf(43,plain,
% 1.13/1.22     (~P2(a5,a4,x431)+~P2(x431,a2,f8(a2,a5))),
% 1.13/1.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,32,2,10,28])).
% 1.13/1.22  cnf(275,plain,
% 1.13/1.22     (~P2(a2,x2751,f8(a2,a5))+~P2(a5,a4,x2751)),
% 1.13/1.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[43,24])).
% 1.13/1.22  cnf(387,plain,
% 1.13/1.22     (~P2(a5,a4,a5)),
% 1.13/1.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,3,275,19])).
% 1.13/1.22  cnf(390,plain,
% 1.13/1.22     ($false),
% 1.13/1.22     inference(scs_inference,[],[387,4,24,15]),
% 1.13/1.22     ['proof']).
% 1.13/1.22  % SZS output end Proof
% 1.13/1.22  % Total time :0.600000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------