↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : FLD031-5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 05:55:19 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 20.82s 20.90s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 20.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : FLD031-5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Wed Jun 19 10:10:54 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.60  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 20.82/20.89  %-------------------------------------------
% 20.82/20.89  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 20.82/20.89  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 20.82/20.89  % Transform   :cnf
% 20.82/20.89  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 20.82/20.89  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 20.82/20.89  
% 20.82/20.89  % Result      :Theorem 20.260000s
% 20.82/20.89  % Output      :CNFRefutation 20.260000s
% 20.82/20.89  %-------------------------------------------
% 20.82/20.90  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 20.82/20.90  % File     : FLD031-5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 20.82/20.90  % Domain   : Field Theory (Ordered fields)
% 20.82/20.90  % Problem  : If a is one, then the multiplicative inverse of a is also one
% 20.82/20.90  % Version  : [Dra93] axioms : Especial.
% 20.82/20.90  %            Theorem formulation : Relational variant with re axiom set.
% 20.82/20.90  % English  :
% 20.82/20.90  
% 20.82/20.90  % Refs     : [Dra93] Draeger (1993), Anwendung des Theorembeweisers SETHEO
% 20.82/20.90  % Source   : [Dra93]
% 20.82/20.90  % Names    :
% 20.82/20.90  
% 20.82/20.90  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 20.82/20.90  % Rating   : 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.3.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.07 v4.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.1, 0.20 v4.0.0, 0.14 v3.4.0, 0.25 v3.3.0, 0.33 v3.1.0, 0.17 v2.7.0, 0.00 v2.4.0, 0.00 v2.2.1, 0.33 v2.1.0
% 20.82/20.90  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (   7 unt;   3 nHn;  30 RR)
% 20.82/20.90  %            Number of literals    :   81 (   0 equ;  51 neg)
% 20.82/20.90  %            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
% 20.82/20.90  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 20.82/20.90  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 20.82/20.90  %            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
% 20.82/20.90  %            Number of variables   :   73 (   0 sgn)
% 20.82/20.90  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 20.82/20.90  
% 20.82/20.90  % Comments :
% 20.82/20.90  % Bugfixes : v2.1.0 - Bugfix in FLD002-0.ax
% 20.82/20.90  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 20.82/20.90  include('Axioms/FLD002-0.ax').
% 20.82/20.90  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 20.82/20.90  cnf(a_is_defined,hypothesis,
% 20.82/20.90      defined(a) ).
% 20.82/20.90  
% 20.82/20.90  cnf(product_2,negated_conjecture,
% 20.82/20.90      product(multiplicative_identity,a,multiplicative_identity) ).
% 20.82/20.90  
% 20.82/20.90  cnf(not_sum_3,negated_conjecture,
% 20.82/20.90      ~ sum(additive_identity,a,additive_identity) ).
% 20.82/20.90  
% 20.82/20.90  cnf(not_product_4,negated_conjecture,
% 20.82/20.90      ~ product(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_inverse(a)) ).
% 20.82/20.90  
% 20.82/20.90  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 20.82/20.90  %-------------------------------------------
% 20.82/20.90  % Proof found
% 20.82/20.90  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 20.82/20.90  % SZS output start Proof
% 20.82/20.90  %ClaNum:30(EqnAxiom:0)
% 20.82/20.90  %VarNum:162(SingletonVarNum:73)
% 20.82/20.90  %MaxLitNum:5
% 20.82/20.90  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 20.82/20.90  %SharedTerms:11
% 20.82/20.90  %goalClause: 4 6 7
% 20.82/20.90  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 20.82/20.90  [1]P1(a1)
% 20.82/20.91  [2]P1(a4)
% 20.82/20.91  [3]P1(a2)
% 20.82/20.91  [4]P2(a4,a2,a4)
% 20.82/20.91  [5]~P4(a1,a1,a4)
% 20.82/20.91  [6]~P4(a1,a2,a1)
% 20.82/20.91  [7]~P2(a4,a4,f6(a2))
% 20.82/20.91  [13]~P1(x131)+P4(a1,x131,x131)
% 20.82/20.91  [14]~P1(x141)+P2(a4,x141,x141)
% 20.82/20.91  [8]~P1(x81)+P1(f5(x81))
% 20.82/20.91  [15]~P1(x151)+P4(f5(x151),x151,a1)
% 20.82/20.91  [22]~P4(x222,x221,x223)+P4(x221,x222,x223)
% 20.82/20.91  [23]~P2(x232,x231,x233)+P2(x231,x232,x233)
% 20.82/20.91  [16]~P1(x161)+P4(a1,x161,a1)+P1(f6(x161))
% 20.82/20.91  [20]~P1(x201)+P2(f6(x201),x201,a4)+P4(a1,x201,a1)
% 20.82/20.91  [19]~P3(x192,x191)+~P3(x191,x192)+P4(a1,x191,x192)
% 20.82/20.91  [10]~P1(x102)+~P1(x101)+P1(f3(x101,x102))
% 20.82/20.91  [11]~P1(x112)+~P1(x111)+P1(f7(x111,x112))
% 20.82/20.91  [17]~P1(x172)+~P1(x171)+P4(x171,x172,f3(x171,x172))
% 20.82/20.91  [18]~P1(x182)+~P1(x181)+P2(x181,x182,f7(x181,x182))
% 20.82/20.91  [12]~P3(x121,x123)+P3(x121,x122)+~P3(x123,x122)
% 20.82/20.91  [9]P3(x92,x91)+~P1(x91)+~P1(x92)+P3(x91,x92)
% 20.82/20.91  [21]~P2(x213,x212,x211)+P3(a1,x211)+~P3(a1,x212)+~P3(a1,x213)
% 20.82/20.91  [24]~P4(x243,x245,x241)+P3(x241,x242)+~P4(x244,x245,x242)+~P3(x243,x244)
% 20.82/20.91  [25]~P4(x251,x256,x254)+P4(x251,x252,x253)+~P4(x254,x255,x253)+~P4(x256,x255,x252)
% 20.82/20.91  [26]~P4(x266,x264,x261)+P4(x261,x262,x263)+~P4(x264,x262,x265)+~P4(x266,x265,x263)
% 20.82/20.91  [27]~P2(x271,x276,x274)+P2(x271,x272,x273)+~P2(x274,x275,x273)+~P2(x276,x275,x272)
% 20.82/20.91  [28]~P2(x286,x284,x281)+P2(x281,x282,x283)+~P2(x284,x282,x285)+~P2(x286,x285,x283)
% 20.82/20.91  [29]~P2(x295,x297,x292)+~P2(x294,x297,x291)+P4(x291,x292,x293)+~P4(x294,x295,x296)+~P2(x296,x297,x293)
% 20.82/20.91  [30]~P2(x307,x302,x305)+~P2(x306,x302,x304)+P2(x301,x302,x303)+~P4(x304,x305,x303)+~P4(x306,x307,x301)
% 20.82/20.91  %EqnAxiom
% 20.82/20.91  
% 20.82/20.91  %-------------------------------------------
% 20.82/20.91  cnf(51,plain,
% 20.82/20.91     (P2(a4,x511,a4)+~P2(a2,x511,a2)),
% 20.82/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,3,9,28])).
% 20.82/20.91  cnf(183,plain,
% 20.82/20.91     (P2(a2,a4,a4)),
% 20.82/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,23,27])).
% 20.82/20.91  cnf(201,plain,
% 20.82/20.91     (~P2(x2011,a2,a2)+P2(a4,x2011,a4)),
% 20.82/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[51,23])).
% 20.82/20.91  cnf(232,plain,
% 20.82/20.91     (~P2(a4,a2,f6(a2))+~P2(a4,a2,a2)),
% 20.82/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,7,201,27])).
% 20.82/20.91  cnf(280,plain,
% 20.82/20.91     (~P2(a2,a4,f6(a2))+~P2(a4,a2,a2)),
% 20.82/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[232,23])).
% 20.82/20.91  cnf(328,plain,
% 20.82/20.91     (~P2(a2,a4,f6(a2))),
% 20.82/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,280,14])).
% 20.82/20.91  cnf(329,plain,
% 20.82/20.91     (~P2(a4,a2,f6(a2))),
% 20.82/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[328,23])).
% 20.82/20.91  cnf(1142,plain,
% 20.82/20.91     (P2(a4,f5(a4),f5(a4))),
% 20.82/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,8,14])).
% 20.82/20.91  cnf(1143,plain,
% 20.82/20.91     (P2(a2,f5(a4),f5(a4))),
% 20.82/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[183,1142,27])).
% 20.82/20.91  cnf(4023,plain,
% 20.82/20.91     (~P2(a2,f6(a2),a2)+~P1(f6(a2))),
% 20.82/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[329,4,27,14])).
% 20.82/20.91  cnf(4180,plain,
% 20.82/20.91     (~P2(f6(a2),a2,a2)+~P1(f6(a2))),
% 20.82/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[4023,23])).
% 20.82/20.91  cnf(4207,plain,
% 20.82/20.91     (P2(f6(a2),a2,a4)),
% 20.88/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,3,20])).
% 20.88/20.91  cnf(4232,plain,
% 20.88/20.91     (~P2(f6(a2),a2,a2)),
% 20.88/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,3,4180,16])).
% 20.88/20.91  cnf(4235,plain,
% 20.88/20.91     (~P2(a2,x42351,a2)+~P2(a4,x42351,a2)),
% 20.88/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[4232,4207,23,27])).
% 20.88/20.91  cnf(4284,plain,
% 20.88/20.91     (~P2(a2,a2,a2)),
% 20.88/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,4235,14])).
% 20.88/20.91  cnf(4289,plain,
% 20.88/20.91     (~P2(x42891,a4,a2)),
% 20.88/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,1143,4284,27,23,28])).
% 20.88/20.91  cnf(4294,plain,
% 20.88/20.91     ($false),
% 20.88/20.91     inference(scs_inference,[],[4289,3,23,14]),
% 20.88/20.91     ['proof']).
% 20.88/20.91  % SZS output end Proof
% 20.88/20.91  % Total time :20.260000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------