↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : FLD032-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:15:42 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.11s 6.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  20 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   84 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   63 (  32   ~;  31   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   0 sgn  31   !;   0   ?;  19   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ product(X4,X5,X2)
      | ~ product(X3,X5,X1)
      | ~ product(X0,X3,X4)
      | product(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',associativity_multiplication_1) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ defined(X0)
      | product(multiplicative_identity,X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_identity_multiplication) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ defined(X0)
      | sum(additive_identity,X0,additive_identity)
      | product(multiplicative_inverse(X0),X0,multiplicative_identity) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_inverse_multiplication) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ product(X1,X0,X2)
      | product(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',commutativity_multiplication) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    defined(multiplicative_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',well_definedness_of_multiplicative_identity) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sum(additive_identity,X0,additive_identity)
      | ~ defined(X0)
      | defined(multiplicative_inverse(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',well_definedness_of_multiplicative_inverse) ).

fof(f27,axiom,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

fof(f28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,a,additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_sum_2) ).

fof(f29,negated_conjecture,
    product(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_inverse(a),multiplicative_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_3) ).

fof(f30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ product(multiplicative_identity,a,multiplicative_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_product_4) ).

tcf(c_84,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( product(X0,X4,X5)
      | ~ product(X2,X3,X5)
      | ~ product(X1,X3,X4)
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_86,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( product(multiplicative_identity,X0,X0)
      | ~ defined(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_87,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( sum(additive_identity,X0,additive_identity)
      | product(multiplicative_inverse(X0),X0,multiplicative_identity)
      | ~ defined(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_88,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( product(X1,X0,X2)
      | ~ product(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_95,plain,
    defined(multiplicative_identity),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_96,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( defined(multiplicative_inverse(X0))
      | sum(additive_identity,X0,additive_identity)
      | ~ defined(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tcf(c_105,plain,
    defined(a),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_106,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,a,additive_identity),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_107,negated_conjecture,
    product(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_inverse(a),multiplicative_identity),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_108,negated_conjecture,
    ~ product(multiplicative_identity,a,multiplicative_identity),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

tcf(c_281,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = multiplicative_inverse(a),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_282,negated_conjecture,
    ~ product(multiplicative_identity,a,multiplicative_identity),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_108]) ).

tcf(c_283,negated_conjecture,
    product(multiplicative_identity,iPr_def_10,multiplicative_identity),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_281]) ).

tcf(c_284,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,a,additive_identity),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_106]) ).

tcf(c_758,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( product(X0,multiplicative_identity,X0)
      | ~ defined(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_88]) ).

tcf(c_791,plain,
    ( defined(multiplicative_inverse(a))
    | ~ defined(a) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_284]) ).

tcf(c_793,plain,
    ( defined(iPr_def_10)
    | ~ defined(a) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_791,c_281]) ).

tcf(c_794,plain,
    defined(iPr_def_10),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_793,c_105]) ).

tcf(c_824,plain,
    ( product(iPr_def_10,a,multiplicative_identity)
    | sum(additive_identity,a,additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(a) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_281,c_87]) ).

tcf(c_826,plain,
    product(iPr_def_10,a,multiplicative_identity),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_824,c_284,c_105]) ).

tcf(c_1230,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( product(multiplicative_identity,X2,X1)
      | ~ product(iPr_def_10,X0,X2)
      | ~ product(multiplicative_identity,X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_283,c_84]) ).

tcf(c_1336,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( product(multiplicative_identity,X1,X0)
      | ~ defined(X0)
      | ~ product(iPr_def_10,X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_1230]) ).

tcf(c_1391,plain,
    ( product(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_identity,a)
    | ~ defined(a) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_826,c_1336]) ).

tcf(c_1393,plain,
    product(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_identity,a),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1391,c_105]) ).

tcf(c_1559,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( product(multiplicative_identity,X0,a)
      | ~ product(iPr_def_10,multiplicative_identity,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1393,c_1230]) ).

tcf(c_1585,plain,
    ( product(multiplicative_identity,iPr_def_10,a)
    | ~ defined(iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_758,c_1559]) ).

tcf(c_1588,plain,
    product(multiplicative_identity,iPr_def_10,a),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1585,c_794]) ).

tcf(c_2005,plain,
    product(iPr_def_10,multiplicative_identity,a),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1588,c_88]) ).

tcf(c_2107,plain,
    ( product(multiplicative_identity,a,multiplicative_identity)
    | ~ defined(multiplicative_identity) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2005,c_1336]) ).

tcf(c_2109,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2107,c_282,c_95]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : FLD032-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/5.38  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 10:47:56 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/5.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.16/5.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/5.43  
% 0.16/5.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.16/5.43  
% 0.16/5.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.16/5.45  % Proving...
% 3.11/6.30  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.11/6.30  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.11/6.30  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.11/6.30  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.11/6.30  % ------ Proving...
% 3.11/6.30  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  % 
% 3.11/6.30  % clauses                               31
% 3.11/6.30  % conjectures                           3
% 3.11/6.30  % EPR                                   22
% 3.11/6.30  % Horn                                  28
% 3.11/6.30  % unary                                 8
% 3.11/6.30  % binary                                6
% 3.11/6.30  % lits                                  82
% 3.11/6.30  % lits eq                               1
% 3.11/6.30  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.11/6.30  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.11/6.30  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.11/6.30  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 3.11/6.30  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  % ------ 
% 3.11/6.30  % Current options:
% 3.11/6.30  % ------ 
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  % 
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  % ------ Proving...
% 3.11/6.30  % 
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.11/6.30  
% 3.11/6.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------