%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : FLD034-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 02:06:06 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.43s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.14 % Problem : FLD034-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0. % 0.07/0.14 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Jun 6 15:29:01 EDT 2022 % 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime : % 0.22/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.22/0.39 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN % 0.22/0.39 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.22/0.39 # % 0.22/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.22/0.39 # Number of axioms: 31 Number of unprocessed: 31 % 0.22/0.39 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.22/0.39 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.22/0.39 # Hello from C++ % 0.22/0.39 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.22/0.39 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.22/0.39 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.22/0.39 # 31 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.22/0.39 # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures. % 0.22/0.39 # There are 2 start rule candidates: % 0.22/0.39 # Found 7 unit axioms. % 0.22/0.39 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.22/0.39 # 2 start rule tableaux created. % 0.22/0.39 # 24 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.22/0.39 # 7 unit axiom clauses % 0.22/0.39 % 0.22/0.39 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.22/0.39 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2 % 0.22/0.39 # Returning from population with 9 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.22/0.39 # We now have 9 tableaux to operate on % 0.22/0.43 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.22/0.43 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.22/0.43 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.22/0.43 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.22/0.43 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.22/0.43 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.22/0.43 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.22/0.43 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.22/0.43 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.22/0.43 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.22/0.43 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.22/0.43 % 0.22/0.43 # End clausification derivation % 0.22/0.43 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (defined(multiplicative_identity))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_61, negated_conjecture, (equalish(m,multiplicative_identity))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_59, hypothesis, (defined(a))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (defined(additive_identity))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_60, hypothesis, (defined(m))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_62, negated_conjecture, (~equalish(multiply(m,a),a))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_58, plain, (~equalish(additive_identity,multiplicative_identity))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_52, plain, (equalish(X1,X1)|~defined(X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (defined(additive_inverse(X1))|~defined(X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~equalish(X2,X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~less_or_equal(X2,X1)|~less_or_equal(X1,X2))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (equalish(multiply(multiplicative_identity,X1),X1)|~defined(X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (defined(multiply(X1,X2))|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~equalish(X3,X2)|~equalish(X1,X3))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (defined(multiplicative_inverse(X1))|equalish(X1,additive_identity)|~defined(X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (equalish(add(additive_identity,X1),X1)|~defined(X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (less_or_equal(X1,X2)|less_or_equal(X2,X1)|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (defined(add(X1,X2))|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_57, plain, (less_or_equal(X1,X2)|~less_or_equal(X3,X2)|~equalish(X3,X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (less_or_equal(X1,X2)|~less_or_equal(X3,X2)|~less_or_equal(X1,X3))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (less_or_equal(additive_identity,multiply(X1,X2))|~less_or_equal(additive_identity,X2)|~less_or_equal(additive_identity,X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (equalish(add(X1,additive_inverse(X1)),additive_identity)|~defined(X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (equalish(multiply(X1,multiplicative_inverse(X1)),multiplicative_identity)|equalish(X1,additive_identity)|~defined(X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (equalish(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2))|~defined(X2)|~equalish(X1,X3))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (equalish(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X2,X1))|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_55, plain, (equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X3,X2))|~defined(X2)|~equalish(X1,X3))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X2,X1))|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (less_or_equal(add(X1,X2),add(X3,X2))|~less_or_equal(X1,X3)|~defined(X2))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (equalish(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3))|~defined(X3)|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (equalish(add(X1,add(X2,X3)),add(add(X1,X2),X3))|~defined(X3)|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (equalish(add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2)),multiply(add(X1,X3),X2))|~defined(X3)|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))). % 0.22/0.43 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.22/0.43 # Begin printing tableau % 0.22/0.43 # Found 5 steps % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_61, negated_conjecture, (equalish(m,multiplicative_identity)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (equalish(m,multiplicative_identity)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_53])). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_139, plain, (equalish(multiplicative_identity,m)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_54])). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_221, plain, (~equalish(m,multiplicative_identity)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_61])). % 0.22/0.43 cnf(i_0_219, plain, (equalish(m,m)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_219, ...])). % 0.22/0.43 # End printing tableau % 0.22/0.43 # SZS output end % 0.22/0.43 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.22/0.43 # Child (8462) has found a proof. % 0.22/0.43 % 0.22/0.43 # Proof search is over... % 0.22/0.43 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------