↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : FLD037-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:11:33 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.29s 1.79s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   51 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  25   ~;  22   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   0 sgn  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(existence_of_inverse_multiplication,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] :
      ( equalish(VAR_0,additive_identity)
      | ~ defined(VAR_0)
      | equalish(multiply(VAR_0,multiplicative_inverse(VAR_0)),multiplicative_identity) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',existence_of_inverse_multiplication) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    ( equalish(A,additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(A)
    | equalish(multiply(A,multiplicative_inverse(A)),multiplicative_identity) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[existence_of_inverse_multiplication]) ).

fof(well_definedness_of_multiplicative_inverse,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] :
      ( equalish(VAR_0,additive_identity)
      | ~ defined(VAR_0)
      | defined(multiplicative_inverse(VAR_0)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',well_definedness_of_multiplicative_inverse) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ( equalish(A,additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(A)
    | defined(multiplicative_inverse(A)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[well_definedness_of_multiplicative_inverse]) ).

fof(symmetry_of_equality,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
      ( ~ equalish(VAR_1,VAR_0)
      | equalish(VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',symmetry_of_equality) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(B,A)
    | equalish(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[symmetry_of_equality]) ).

fof(transitivity_of_equality,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( ~ equalish(VAR_2,VAR_1)
      | ~ equalish(VAR_0,VAR_2)
      | equalish(VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_equality) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(C,B)
    | ~ equalish(A,C)
    | equalish(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[transitivity_of_equality]) ).

fof(compatibility_of_equality_and_multiplication,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( ~ equalish(VAR_0,VAR_2)
      | ~ defined(VAR_1)
      | equalish(multiply(VAR_0,VAR_1),multiply(VAR_2,VAR_1)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',compatibility_of_equality_and_multiplication) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(A,C)
    | ~ defined(B)
    | equalish(multiply(A,B),multiply(C,B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[compatibility_of_equality_and_multiplication]) ).

fof(a_is_defined,axiom,
    defined(a),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    defined(a),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a_is_defined]) ).

fof(a_not_equal_to_additive_identity_3,axiom,
    ~ equalish(a,additive_identity),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a_not_equal_to_additive_identity_3) ).

cnf(c_30,plain,
    ~ equalish(a,additive_identity),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a_not_equal_to_additive_identity_3]) ).

fof(a_equals_b_4,axiom,
    equalish(a,b),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a_equals_b_4) ).

cnf(c_31,plain,
    equalish(a,b),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a_equals_b_4]) ).

fof(multiplicative_identity_not_equal_to_multiply_5,axiom,
    ~ equalish(multiplicative_identity,multiply(b,multiplicative_inverse(a))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_identity_not_equal_to_multiply_5) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    ~ equalish(multiplicative_identity,multiply(b,multiplicative_inverse(a))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[multiplicative_identity_not_equal_to_multiply_5]) ).

cnf(c_8874,plain,
    ( equalish(a,additive_identity)
    | defined(multiplicative_inverse(a)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_136,plain,
    defined(multiplicative_inverse(a)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_30,c_8874]) ).

cnf(c_8875,plain,
    ( equalish(a,additive_identity)
    | equalish(multiply(a,multiplicative_inverse(a)),multiplicative_identity) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_147,plain,
    equalish(multiply(a,multiplicative_inverse(a)),multiplicative_identity),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_30,c_8875]) ).

cnf(c_213,plain,
    equalish(b,a),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_31,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_217,plain,
    ~ equalish(multiply(b,multiplicative_inverse(a)),multiplicative_identity),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_32]) ).

cnf(c_8876,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(A,multiplicative_identity)
    | ~ equalish(multiply(b,multiplicative_inverse(a)),A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_217]) ).

cnf(c_8620,plain,
    ~ equalish(multiply(b,multiplicative_inverse(a)),multiply(a,multiplicative_inverse(a))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8876,c_147]) ).

cnf(c_8877,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(b,a)
    | ~ defined(multiplicative_inverse(a)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_8620]) ).

cnf(c_8878,plain,
    ~ defined(multiplicative_inverse(a)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8877,c_213]) ).

cnf(c_8873,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_136,c_8878]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : FLD037-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 02:27:40 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.36  % Process 79791 was started by sandbox on n003,
% 0.10/0.36  % Sun Sep 27 02:27:40 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/0.37  
% 0.10/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 6.29/1.79  
% 6.29/1.79  % given #500 (F,wt=15): 6287 -equalish(multiply(a,multiplicative_identity),additive_identity).  [ur(22,a,6270,a)].
% 6.29/1.79  
% 6.29/1.79  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 6.29/1.79  
% 6.29/1.79  % Proof 1 at 0.57 (+ 0.18) seconds.
% 6.29/1.79  % Length of proof is 15.
% 6.29/1.79  % Level of proof is 3.
% 6.29/1.79  % Maximum clause weight is 26.000.
% 6.29/1.79  % Given clauses 708.
% 6.29/1.79  
% 6.29/1.79  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------