%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : FLD039-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:23:16 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.32s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(symmetry_of_equality,axiom,
( ~ equalish(X2,X1)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',symmetry_of_equality) ).
cnf(different_identities,axiom,
~ equalish(additive_identity,multiplicative_identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',different_identities) ).
cnf(multiplicative_identity_equals_additive_identity_3,negated_conjecture,
equalish(multiplicative_identity,additive_identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiplicative_identity_equals_additive_identity_3) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ equalish(X2,X1)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[symmetry_of_equality]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
~ equalish(additive_identity,multiplicative_identity),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[different_identities]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ equalish(X2,X1)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
equalish(multiplicative_identity,additive_identity),
multiplicative_identity_equals_additive_identity_3 ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
~ equalish(additive_identity,multiplicative_identity),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : FLD039-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.49 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.49 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.49 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.49 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.49 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.50 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.50 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.50 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:40:40 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.50 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.50 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.57 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.57 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/0.61 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.32/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.32/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.32/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.32/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.61 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.61 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1328538 completed with status 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.32/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.32/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.32/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.32/0.61 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.32/0.61 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.32/0.61 % Search class: FGUNF-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.32/0.61 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.32/0.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c with 136s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.61 % Starting U----_206e_02_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C02CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.61 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1328539 completed with status 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.32/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.32/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.32/0.61 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.32/0.61 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.32/0.61 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.32/0.61 % Search class: FGUNF-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.32/0.61 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.32/0.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.61 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.32/0.61
% 0.32/0.61 % Proof found!
% 0.32/0.61 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.32/0.61 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.32/0.61 % Parsed axioms : 30
% 0.32/0.61 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Initial clauses : 30
% 0.32/0.61 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Initial clauses in saturation : 30
% 0.32/0.61 % Processed clauses : 9
% 0.32/0.61 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.32/0.61 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Generated clauses : 2
% 0.32/0.61 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Paramodulations : 2
% 0.32/0.61 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % NegExts : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.61 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.61 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.61 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.61 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.61 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.61 % Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.32/0.61 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.32/0.61 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.32/0.61 % Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.32/0.61 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 21
% 0.32/0.61 % ...number of literals in the above : 64
% 0.32/0.61 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.32/0.61 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.32/0.61 % Termbank termtop insertions : 876
% 0.32/0.61 % Search garbage collected termcells : 71
% 0.32/0.61
% 0.32/0.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/0.61 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.32/0.61 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.32/0.61 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.32/0.61 % Maximum resident set size: 3660 pages
% 0.32/0.61
% 0.32/0.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/0.61 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.32/0.61 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.32/0.61 % Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.32/0.61 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.32/0.61 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------