↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : FLD039-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 02:27:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.32s 4.51s
% Output   : Refutation 4.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : FLD039-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun  6 10:47:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Mon Jun  6 10:47:22 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 8403.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.12/0.35  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.35  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.43  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.43  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.43  number of clauses in intial UL: 48
% 0.18/0.43  number of clauses initially in problem: 52
% 0.18/0.43  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 92
% 0.18/0.43  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.18/0.43  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.43  absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.18/0.43     distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.18/0.43     distinct function count: 4
% 0.18/0.43     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  =========== start of search ===========
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 4.32/4.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.32/4.51  % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 3 [ 2 2 147 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 4 [ 3 4 23542 ] (0.00 seconds, 196681 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 5 [ 3 2 144 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 6 [ 3 1 770 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 7 [ 6 2 225 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 8 [ 3 1 358 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 9 [ 5 1 139 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 10 [ 3 1 408 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 11 [ 3 2 608 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 12 [ 3 2 365 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 13 [ 3 2 498 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 14 [ 5 2 103 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 15 [ 3 2 323 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 16 [ 3 1 220 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 17 [ 15 1 177 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 18 [ 4 2 423 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 19 [ 17 1 219 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 20 [ 19 1 197 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 21 [ 3 8 62681 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 22 [ 20 1 103 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 23 [ 19 1 140 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 24 [ 20 2 150 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   4.13 sec ----> 1643 [binary,1642.1,24.1] {+} $F.
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 4.
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 4.32/4.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.32/4.51  % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  3 [] {+} sum(additive_identity,A,A)| -defined(A).
% 4.32/4.51  19 [] {+} sum(additive_identity,A,B)| -less_or_equal(A,B)| -less_or_equal(B,A).
% 4.32/4.51  21 [] {+} less_or_equal(A,B)|less_or_equal(B,A)| -defined(A)| -defined(B).
% 4.32/4.51  22 [] {+} less_or_equal(A,B)| -less_or_equal(C,D)| -sum(C,E,A)| -sum(D,E,B).
% 4.32/4.51  24 [] {+} -sum(additive_identity,additive_identity,multiplicative_identity).
% 4.32/4.51  44 [factor,21.1.2,factor_simp] {+} less_or_equal(A,A)| -defined(A).
% 4.32/4.51  49 [] {+} defined(additive_identity).
% 4.32/4.51  50 [] {-} defined(multiplicative_identity).
% 4.32/4.51  52 [] {+} sum(additive_identity,multiplicative_identity,additive_identity).
% 4.32/4.51  53 [hyper,49,44] {+} less_or_equal(additive_identity,additive_identity).
% 4.32/4.51  81 [hyper,50,3] {+} sum(additive_identity,multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_identity).
% 4.32/4.51  1634 [hyper,81,22,53,52] {+} less_or_equal(additive_identity,multiplicative_identity).
% 4.32/4.51  1635 [hyper,81,22,53,52] {+} less_or_equal(multiplicative_identity,additive_identity).
% 4.32/4.51  1642 [hyper,1635,19,1634] {-} sum(additive_identity,additive_identity,multiplicative_identity).
% 4.32/4.51  1643 [binary,1642.1,24.1] {+} $F.
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  % SZS output end Refutation
% 4.32/4.51  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  ============ end of search ============
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  true clauses given           5      (16.7%)
% 4.32/4.51  false clauses given         25
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51        FALSE     TRUE
% 4.32/4.51     4  14        4
% 4.32/4.51     5  65        4
% 4.32/4.51     6  179       15
% 4.32/4.51     7  184       7
% 4.32/4.51     8  283       44
% 4.32/4.51     9  15        0
% 4.32/4.51    10  118       83
% 4.32/4.51    11  11        0
% 4.32/4.51    12  122       102
% 4.32/4.51    14  183       114
% 4.32/4.51    15  11        0
% 4.32/4.51  tot:  1185      373      (23.9% true)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Model 24 [ 20 2 150 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 4.32/4.51  
% 4.32/4.51  Process 8403 finished Mon Jun  6 10:47:26 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------