↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : FLD043-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:22:49 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.86s 0.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.86s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   39 (  13 unt;   0 nHn;  39 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   95 (   0 equ;  59 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   92 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(distributivity_1,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X5,X7,X2)
    | ~ product(X4,X7,X1)
    | ~ product(X6,X7,X3)
    | ~ sum(X4,X5,X6)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',distributivity_1) ).

cnf(existence_of_identity_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_identity,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_identity_addition) ).

cnf(product_3,negated_conjecture,
    product(additive_identity,a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_3) ).

cnf(well_definedness_of_additive_identity,axiom,
    defined(additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',well_definedness_of_additive_identity) ).

cnf(commutativity_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(X2,X1,X3)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',commutativity_addition) ).

cnf(associativity_addition_1,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(X5,X6,X3)
    | ~ sum(X4,X6,X2)
    | ~ sum(X1,X4,X5)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',associativity_addition_1) ).

cnf(associativity_addition_2,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(X4,X6,X3)
    | ~ sum(X5,X2,X6)
    | ~ sum(X4,X5,X1)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',associativity_addition_2) ).

cnf(existence_of_inverse_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_inverse(X1),X1,additive_identity) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_inverse_addition) ).

cnf(b_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_is_defined) ).

cnf(not_sum_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,b,additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_sum_4) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ product(X5,X7,X2)
    | ~ product(X4,X7,X1)
    | ~ product(X6,X7,X3)
    | ~ sum(X4,X5,X6)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[distributivity_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_identity,X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[existence_of_identity_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ product(X5,X7,X2)
    | ~ product(X4,X7,X1)
    | ~ product(X6,X7,X3)
    | ~ sum(X4,X5,X6)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_identity,X1,X1) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X5)
    | ~ product(X5,X4,X2)
    | ~ product(X5,X4,X3)
    | ~ product(additive_identity,X4,X1)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    product(additive_identity,a,b),
    product_3 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    defined(additive_identity),
    well_definedness_of_additive_identity ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X2,X1,X3)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[commutativity_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X5,X6,X3)
    | ~ sum(X4,X6,X2)
    | ~ sum(X1,X4,X5)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[associativity_addition_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ product(additive_identity,a,X2)
    | ~ product(additive_identity,a,X1)
    | sum(X1,X2,b) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X4,X6,X3)
    | ~ sum(X5,X2,X6)
    | ~ sum(X4,X5,X1)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[associativity_addition_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X2,X1,X3)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X5,X6,X3)
    | ~ sum(X4,X6,X2)
    | ~ sum(X1,X4,X5)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ product(additive_identity,a,X1)
    | sum(b,X1,b) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X4,X6,X3)
    | ~ sum(X5,X2,X6)
    | ~ sum(X4,X5,X1)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(X1,additive_identity,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_inverse(X1),X1,additive_identity) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[existence_of_inverse_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X4,X3,X2)
    | ~ sum(X1,X4,additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(X3)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    sum(b,b,b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    defined(b),
    b_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X4,X3,X1)
    | ~ sum(X4,X3,X2)
    | ~ defined(X3)
    | sum(X1,additive_identity,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_inverse(X1),X1,additive_identity) ),
    c_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sum(X1,b,additive_identity)
    | sum(X1,b,b) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ sum(additive_inverse(X2),X2,X1)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | sum(X1,additive_identity,additive_identity) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_inverse(b),b,b),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_31]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,b,additive_identity),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_sum_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    sum(b,additive_identity,additive_identity),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,b,additive_identity),
    c_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_36]),c_0_37]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : FLD043-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:40:34 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.86/0.73  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.86/0.73  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.86/0.73  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.86/0.73  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.86/0.73  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.73  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.73  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.73  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2929120 completed with status 0
% 0.86/0.73  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.86/0.73  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.86/0.73  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.86/0.73  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.86/0.73  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.86/0.73  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.86/0.73  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.86/0.73  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.86/0.73  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.73  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.73  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c with 136s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.73  % Starting U----_206e_02_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.73  % Starting G-E--_208_C02CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.73  % G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c with pid 2929126 completed with status 0
% 0.86/0.73  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c
% 0.86/0.73  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.86/0.73  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.86/0.73  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.86/0.73  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.86/0.73  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.86/0.73  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.86/0.73  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.86/0.73  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.73  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.73  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c with 136s (1) cores
% 0.86/0.73  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.86/0.73  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.86/0.73  
% 0.86/0.73  % Proof found!
% 0.86/0.73  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.86/0.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.86/0.73  % Parsed axioms                        : 30
% 0.86/0.73  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.86/0.73  % Initial clauses                      : 30
% 0.86/0.73  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.86/0.73  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 30
% 0.86/0.73  % Processed clauses                    : 1080
% 0.86/0.73  % ...of these trivial                  : 105
% 0.86/0.73  % ...subsumed                          : 293
% 0.86/0.73  % ...remaining for further processing  : 682
% 0.86/0.73  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.86/0.73  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.86/0.73  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.86/0.73  % Backward-rewritten                   : 19
% 0.86/0.73  % Generated clauses                    : 8151
% 1.91/0.73  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6499
% 1.91/0.73  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.91/0.73  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 1.91/0.73  % Paramodulations                      : 8141
% 1.91/0.73  % Factorizations                       : 10
% 1.91/0.73  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.91/0.73  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.91/0.73  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.91/0.73  % Total rewrite steps                  : 4469
% 1.91/0.73  % ...of those cached                   : 4304
% 1.91/0.73  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.91/0.73  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.91/0.73  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.91/0.73  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.91/0.73  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.91/0.73  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.91/0.73  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.91/0.73  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.91/0.73  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.91/0.73  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.91/0.73  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.91/0.73  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.91/0.73  % Current number of processed clauses  : 629
% 1.91/0.73  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 195
% 1.91/0.73  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.91/0.73  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 1.91/0.73  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 432
% 1.91/0.73  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5475
% 1.91/0.73  % ...number of literals in the above   : 18167
% 1.91/0.73  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.91/0.73  % Current number of archived clauses   : 53
% 1.91/0.73  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8948
% 1.91/0.73  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7346
% 1.91/0.73  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 297
% 1.91/0.73  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 258
% 1.91/0.73  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.91/0.73  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 126
% 1.91/0.73  % BW rewrite match successes           : 20
% 1.91/0.73  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.91/0.73  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.91/0.73  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 126853
% 1.91/0.73  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 116
% 1.91/0.73  
% 1.91/0.73  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.91/0.73  % User time                : 0.237 s
% 1.91/0.73  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 1.91/0.73  % Total time               : 0.247 s
% 1.91/0.73  % Maximum resident set size: 3608 pages
% 1.91/0.73  
% 1.91/0.73  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.91/0.73  % User time                : 1.025 s
% 1.91/0.73  % System time              : 0.057 s
% 1.91/0.73  % Total time               : 1.082 s
% 1.91/0.73  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 1.91/0.73  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------