↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : FLD043-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:23:17 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.39s 0.81s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   44 (  16 unt;   4 nHn;  44 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  105 (   0 equ;  60 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   83 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(totality_of_order_relation,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',totality_of_order_relation) ).

cnf(well_definedness_of_multiplicative_identity,axiom,
    defined(multiplicative_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',well_definedness_of_multiplicative_identity) ).

cnf(antisymmetry_of_order_relation,axiom,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | sum(additive_identity,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',antisymmetry_of_order_relation) ).

cnf(distributivity_1,axiom,
    ( ~ product(X5,X7,X2)
    | ~ product(X4,X7,X1)
    | ~ product(X6,X7,X3)
    | ~ sum(X4,X5,X6)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',distributivity_1) ).

cnf(existence_of_identity_multiplication,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | product(multiplicative_identity,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_identity_multiplication) ).

cnf(commutativity_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(X2,X1,X3)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',commutativity_addition) ).

cnf(existence_of_inverse_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_inverse(X1),X1,additive_identity) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_inverse_addition) ).

cnf(associativity_addition_1,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(X5,X6,X3)
    | ~ sum(X4,X6,X2)
    | ~ sum(X1,X4,X5)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',associativity_addition_1) ).

cnf(product_3,negated_conjecture,
    product(additive_identity,a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',product_3) ).

cnf(a_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

cnf(not_sum_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,b,additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_sum_4) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[totality_of_order_relation]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    defined(multiplicative_identity),
    well_definedness_of_multiplicative_identity ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | sum(additive_identity,X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[antisymmetry_of_order_relation]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(multiplicative_identity,X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,multiplicative_identity) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ product(X5,X7,X2)
    | ~ product(X4,X7,X1)
    | ~ product(X6,X7,X3)
    | ~ sum(X4,X5,X6)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[distributivity_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | product(multiplicative_identity,X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[existence_of_identity_multiplication]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X2,X1,X3)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[commutativity_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | sum(additive_identity,X1,X2) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    less_or_equal(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_identity),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ product(X5,X7,X2)
    | ~ product(X4,X7,X1)
    | ~ product(X6,X7,X3)
    | ~ sum(X4,X5,X6)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | product(multiplicative_identity,X1,X1) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X2,X1,X3)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    sum(additive_identity,multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_identity),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_inverse(X1),X1,additive_identity) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[existence_of_inverse_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X5,X4,multiplicative_identity)
    | ~ defined(X3)
    | ~ product(X5,X3,X1)
    | ~ product(X4,X3,X2)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    sum(multiplicative_identity,additive_identity,multiplicative_identity),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X5,X6,X3)
    | ~ sum(X4,X6,X2)
    | ~ sum(X1,X4,X5)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[associativity_addition_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_inverse(X1),X1,additive_identity) ),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X3)
    | ~ product(multiplicative_identity,X3,X1)
    | ~ product(additive_identity,X3,X2)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    product(additive_identity,a,b),
    product_3 ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    a_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X5,X6,X3)
    | ~ sum(X4,X6,X2)
    | ~ sum(X1,X4,X5)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(X1,additive_inverse(X1),additive_identity) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ product(multiplicative_identity,a,X1)
    | sum(X1,b,a) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ sum(X4,additive_inverse(X3),X2)
    | ~ defined(X3)
    | sum(X1,X2,additive_identity) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    sum(a,b,a),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_22]),c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X1,X2,X2)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | sum(X1,additive_identity,additive_identity) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    sum(b,a,a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,b,additive_identity),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_sum_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    sum(b,additive_identity,additive_identity),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,b,additive_identity),
    c_0_40 ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_41]),c_0_42]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : FLD043-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.44  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.44  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:40:27 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.27/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.27/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.39/0.81  % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.39/0.81  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.39/0.81  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.39/0.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.39/0.81  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.39/0.81  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.39/0.81  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.39/0.81  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2120517 completed with status 0
% 1.39/0.81  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.39/0.81  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.39/0.81  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.39/0.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.39/0.81  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.39/0.81  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.39/0.81  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 1.39/0.81  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.39/0.81  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.39/0.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.39/0.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c with 136s (1) cores
% 1.39/0.81  % Starting U----_206e_02_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.39/0.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C02CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.39/0.81  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2120524 completed with status 0
% 1.39/0.81  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.39/0.81  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.39/0.81  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.39/0.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.39/0.81  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.39/0.81  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.39/0.81  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 1.39/0.81  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.39/0.81  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.39/0.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.39/0.81  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 1.39/0.81  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.39/0.81  
% 1.39/0.81  % Proof found!
% 1.39/0.81  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.39/0.81  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.39/0.81  % Parsed axioms                        : 30
% 1.39/0.81  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.39/0.81  % Initial clauses                      : 30
% 1.39/0.81  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.39/0.81  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 30
% 1.39/0.81  % Processed clauses                    : 1335
% 1.39/0.81  % ...of these trivial                  : 28
% 1.39/0.81  % ...subsumed                          : 433
% 1.39/0.81  % ...remaining for further processing  : 874
% 1.39/0.81  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.39/0.81  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.39/0.81  % Backward-subsumed                    : 15
% 1.39/0.81  % Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 1.39/0.81  % Generated clauses                    : 4945
% 1.39/0.81  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4167
% 1.39/0.81  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.39/0.81  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.39/0.81  % Paramodulations                      : 4945
% 1.39/0.81  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.39/0.81  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.39/0.81  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.39/0.81  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.39/0.81  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2001
% 1.39/0.81  % ...of those cached                   : 1921
% 1.39/0.81  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.39/0.81  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.39/0.81  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.39/0.81  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.39/0.81  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.39/0.81  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.39/0.81  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.39/0.81  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.39/0.81  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.39/0.81  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.39/0.81  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.39/0.81  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.39/0.81  % Current number of processed clauses  : 823
% 1.39/0.81  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 97
% 1.39/0.81  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.39/0.81  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 1.39/0.81  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 724
% 1.39/0.81  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2874
% 1.39/0.81  % ...number of literals in the above   : 10404
% 1.39/0.81  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.39/0.81  % Current number of archived clauses   : 51
% 1.39/0.81  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 26943
% 1.39/0.81  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22772
% 1.39/0.81  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 446
% 1.39/0.81  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 641
% 1.39/0.81  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.39/0.81  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 24
% 1.39/0.81  % BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 1.39/0.81  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.39/0.81  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.39/0.81  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 73644
% 1.39/0.81  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 116
% 1.39/0.81  
% 1.39/0.81  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.39/0.81  % User time                : 0.216 s
% 1.39/0.81  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 1.39/0.81  % Total time               : 0.224 s
% 1.39/0.81  % Maximum resident set size: 3660 pages
% 1.39/0.81  
% 1.39/0.81  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.39/0.81  % User time                : 0.719 s
% 1.39/0.81  % System time              : 0.049 s
% 1.39/0.81  % Total time               : 0.767 s
% 1.39/0.81  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 1.39/0.81  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------