%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : FLD055-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:20:25 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.96s 2.15s
% Output : Refutation 1.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 9 unt; 1 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 27 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(not_less_or_equal_6,negated_conjecture,
~ less_or_equal(a,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_less_or_equal_6) ).
cnf(less_or_equal_4,negated_conjecture,
less_or_equal(a,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_or_equal_4) ).
cnf(transitivity_of_order_relation,axiom,
( less_or_equal(X33,X34)
| ~ less_or_equal(X33,X35)
| ~ less_or_equal(X35,X34) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',transitivity_of_order_relation) ).
cnf(c_is_defined,plain,
defined(c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_is_defined) ).
cnf(totality_of_order_relation,axiom,
( less_or_equal(X37,X38)
| less_or_equal(X38,X37)
| ~ defined(X37)
| ~ defined(X38) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',totality_of_order_relation) ).
cnf(c521,plain,
( less_or_equal(X39,X39)
| ~ defined(X39) ),
inference(factor,[status(thm)],[totality_of_order_relation]) ).
cnf(c555,plain,
less_or_equal(c,c),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c521,c_is_defined]) ).
cnf(b_equals_c_5,negated_conjecture,
equalish(b,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_equals_c_5) ).
cnf(symmetry_of_equality,axiom,
( equalish(X11,X12)
| ~ equalish(X12,X11) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',symmetry_of_equality) ).
cnf(c67,plain,
equalish(c,b),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[symmetry_of_equality,b_equals_c_5]) ).
cnf(compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation,axiom,
( less_or_equal(X59,X58)
| ~ less_or_equal(X57,X58)
| ~ equalish(X57,X59) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation) ).
cnf(c906,plain,
( less_or_equal(b,X109)
| ~ less_or_equal(c,X109) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation,c67]) ).
cnf(c4048,plain,
less_or_equal(b,c),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c906,c555]) ).
cnf(c4049,plain,
( less_or_equal(X130,c)
| ~ less_or_equal(X130,b) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c4048,transitivity_of_order_relation]) ).
cnf(c9536,plain,
less_or_equal(a,c),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c4049,less_or_equal_4]) ).
cnf(c9537,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c9536,not_less_or_equal_6]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13 % Problem : FLD055-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed May 8 23:53:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 1.96/2.15 % Version: 1.5
% 1.96/2.15 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.96/2.15 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.96/2.15
% 1.96/2.15 % Initial clauses : 33
% 1.96/2.15 % Processed clauses : 309
% 1.96/2.15 % Factors computed : 31
% 1.96/2.15 % Resolvents computed: 9682
% 1.96/2.15 % Tautologies deleted: 17
% 1.96/2.15 % Forward subsumed : 52
% 1.96/2.15 % Backward subsumed : 0
% 1.96/2.15 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 1.96/2.15 % User time : 1.764 s
% 1.96/2.15 % System time : 0.029 s
% 1.96/2.15 % Total time : 1.793 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------