↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : FLD055-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:22:53 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  13 unt;   0 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   40 (   0 equ;  20 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(commutativity_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(X2,X1,X3)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',commutativity_addition) ).

cnf(existence_of_identity_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_identity,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_identity_addition) ).

cnf(compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ sum(X4,X5,X2)
    | ~ sum(X3,X5,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X3,X4)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition) ).

cnf(sum_5,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_identity,b,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_5) ).

cnf(a_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

cnf(not_less_or_equal_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_or_equal(a,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_less_or_equal_6) ).

cnf(less_or_equal_4,negated_conjecture,
    less_or_equal(a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_or_equal_4) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X2,X1,X3)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[commutativity_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_identity,X1,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[existence_of_identity_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X4,X5,X2)
    | ~ sum(X3,X5,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X3,X4)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X2,X1,X3)
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    c_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_identity,b,c),
    sum_5 ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | sum(additive_identity,X1,X1) ),
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    a_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X4,X5,X2)
    | ~ sum(X3,X5,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X3,X4)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    sum(b,additive_identity,c),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    sum(additive_identity,a,a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_or_equal(a,c),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_less_or_equal_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sum(X2,additive_identity,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X2,b)
    | less_or_equal(X1,c) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    sum(a,additive_identity,a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    less_or_equal(a,b),
    less_or_equal_4 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_or_equal(a,c),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),c_0_21]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : FLD055-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.46  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.46  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.46  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.46  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.46  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.46  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.46  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.46  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:37:58 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.46  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.55  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.55  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55  % new_bool_1 with pid 2669656 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.55  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.24/0.55  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.55  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.55  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.55  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.55  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2669661 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.55  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.24/0.55  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.55  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.55  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.55  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.55  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.24/0.55  
% 0.24/0.55  % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.55  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/0.55  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.55  % Parsed axioms                        : 32
% 0.24/0.55  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 11
% 0.24/0.55  % Initial clauses                      : 21
% 0.24/0.55  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.24/0.55  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 21
% 0.24/0.55  % Processed clauses                    : 73
% 0.24/0.55  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.24/0.55  % ...subsumed                          : 17
% 0.24/0.55  % ...remaining for further processing  : 56
% 0.24/0.55  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.24/0.55  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/0.55  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.24/0.55  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.24/0.55  % Generated clauses                    : 110
% 0.24/0.55  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 77
% 0.24/0.55  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.24/0.55  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.24/0.55  % Paramodulations                      : 110
% 0.24/0.55  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/0.55  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.24/0.55  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.24/0.55  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.24/0.55  % Total rewrite steps                  : 30
% 0.24/0.55  % ...of those cached                   : 18
% 0.24/0.55  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.24/0.55  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.24/0.55  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.55  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.24/0.55  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.55  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.24/0.55  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55  % Current number of processed clauses  : 54
% 0.24/0.55  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 20
% 0.24/0.55  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.55  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.24/0.55  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 33
% 0.24/0.55  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24
% 0.24/0.55  % ...number of literals in the above   : 79
% 0.24/0.55  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/0.55  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.24/0.55  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 76
% 0.24/0.55  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65
% 0.24/0.55  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 17
% 0.24/0.55  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.24/0.55  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/0.55  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.24/0.55  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.24/0.55  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/0.55  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/0.55  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2035
% 0.24/0.55  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 145
% 0.24/0.55  
% 0.24/0.55  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.56  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.24/0.56  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Maximum resident set size: 3616 pages
% 0.24/0.56  
% 0.24/0.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.56  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.24/0.56  % System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.24/0.56  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------