↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : FLD058-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 02:28:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.57s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.01/0.12  % Problem  : FLD058-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.19/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.19/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun  6 11:20:04 EDT 2022
% 0.19/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.57  
% 0.19/0.57  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.57  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.57  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.57  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.57  SPASS derived 855 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 534 clauses.
% 0.19/0.57  SPASS allocated 76532 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.57  SPASS spent	0:00:00.22 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.57  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.19/0.57  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.57  		0:00:00.02 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.57  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.57  		0:00:00.14 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.57  
% 0.19/0.57  
% 0.19/0.57  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 16 :
% 0.19/0.57  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.57  3[0:Inp] ||  -> less_or_equal(additive_identity,a)*r.
% 0.19/0.57  4[0:Inp] ||  -> less_or_equal(a,b)*l.
% 0.19/0.57  5[0:Inp] || equalish(a,additive_identity)*l -> .
% 0.19/0.57  6[0:Inp] ||  -> equalish(b,additive_identity)*l.
% 0.19/0.57  22[0:Inp] || less_or_equal(u,v)*+ less_or_equal(v,u)* -> equalish(v,u).
% 0.19/0.57  28[0:Inp] || equalish(u,v)* -> equalish(v,u).
% 0.19/0.57  29[0:Inp] || equalish(u,v)* equalish(v,w)* -> equalish(u,w)*.
% 0.19/0.57  32[0:Inp] || equalish(u,v)*+ less_or_equal(u,w)* -> less_or_equal(v,w)*.
% 0.19/0.57  34[0:Res:6.0,28.0] ||  -> equalish(additive_identity,b)*r.
% 0.19/0.57  40[0:Res:4.0,22.1] || less_or_equal(b,a)*r -> equalish(b,a).
% 0.19/0.57  43[0:Res:3.0,32.0] || equalish(additive_identity,u)*+ -> less_or_equal(u,a)*.
% 0.19/0.57  50[0:Res:28.1,5.0] || equalish(additive_identity,a)*r -> .
% 0.19/0.57  1109[0:Res:34.0,43.0] ||  -> less_or_equal(b,a)*r.
% 0.19/0.57  1166[0:MRR:40.0,1109.0] ||  -> equalish(b,a)*r.
% 0.19/0.57  1174[0:NCh:29.2,29.1,1166.0,50.0] || equalish(additive_identity,b)*r -> .
% 0.19/0.57  1178[0:MRR:1174.0,34.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.57  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.57  Formulae used in the proof : less_or_equal_3 less_or_equal_4 a_not_equal_to_additive_identity_5 b_equals_additive_identity_6 antisymmetry_of_order_relation symmetry_of_equality transitivity_of_equality compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation
% 0.19/0.57  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------