↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : FLD059-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:22:53 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 5.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   73 (  15 unt;   7 nHn;  73 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  177 (   0 equ; 100 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  107 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(symmetry_of_equality,axiom,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,X1)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',symmetry_of_equality) ).

cnf(existence_of_identity_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(add(additive_identity,X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',existence_of_identity_addition) ).

cnf(totality_of_order_relation,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',totality_of_order_relation) ).

cnf(transitivity_of_equality,axiom,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',transitivity_of_equality) ).

cnf(well_definedness_of_additive_identity,axiom,
    defined(additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',well_definedness_of_additive_identity) ).

cnf(transitivity_of_order_relation,axiom,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X3)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',transitivity_of_order_relation) ).

cnf(compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation,axiom,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation) ).

cnf(antisymmetry_of_order_relation,axiom,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',antisymmetry_of_order_relation) ).

cnf(less_or_equal_2,negated_conjecture,
    less_or_equal(additive_identity,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_or_equal_2) ).

cnf(commutativity_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',commutativity_addition) ).

cnf(compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X1,X3)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | less_or_equal(add(X1,X2),add(X3,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition) ).

cnf(a_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

cnf(well_definedness_of_addition,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | defined(add(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',well_definedness_of_addition) ).

cnf(not_less_or_equal_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,add(a,a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_less_or_equal_3) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,X1)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[symmetry_of_equality]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(add(additive_identity,X1),X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[existence_of_identity_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[totality_of_order_relation]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitivity_of_equality]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,X1)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(add(additive_identity,X1),X1) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    defined(additive_identity),
    well_definedness_of_additive_identity ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X3)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitivity_of_order_relation]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(X1,add(additive_identity,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[antisymmetry_of_order_relation]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,additive_identity)
    | less_or_equal(additive_identity,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X3)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    less_or_equal(additive_identity,a),
    less_or_equal_2 ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | equalish(X1,add(additive_identity,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    less_or_equal(additive_identity,additive_identity),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[commutativity_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X1,additive_identity)
    | less_or_equal(X1,a) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X1)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2)
    | less_or_equal(add(additive_identity,X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    equalish(additive_identity,additive_identity),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,add(additive_identity,X2))
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X2,X1)) ),
    c_0_34 ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X2,additive_identity)
    | less_or_equal(X1,a) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,X1)
    | less_or_equal(add(additive_identity,additive_identity),X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X1,X3)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | less_or_equal(add(X1,X2),add(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | equalish(add(X1,additive_identity),X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X1,add(additive_identity,additive_identity))
    | less_or_equal(X1,a) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X1,X3)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | less_or_equal(add(X1,X2),add(X3,X2)) ),
    c_0_42 ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(add(X1,additive_identity),X2)
    | less_or_equal(add(additive_identity,X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X1,additive_identity)
    | less_or_equal(add(X1,additive_identity),a) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    a_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,additive_identity)
    | less_or_equal(add(additive_identity,X1),a) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,hypothesis,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,a)
    | less_or_equal(a,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    less_or_equal(add(additive_identity,additive_identity),a),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_49]),c_0_21]),c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(add(X1,additive_identity),X2)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,hypothesis,
    less_or_equal(a,a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | defined(add(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[well_definedness_of_addition]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(a,add(additive_identity,additive_identity))
    | equalish(a,add(additive_identity,additive_identity)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | less_or_equal(X1,add(X2,additive_identity)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_45]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,hypothesis,
    equalish(a,a),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_53]),c_0_53])]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | defined(add(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_54 ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(a,additive_identity)
    | equalish(a,add(additive_identity,additive_identity)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]),c_0_48])]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,hypothesis,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(a,X1)
    | less_or_equal(add(additive_identity,a),X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_57]),c_0_48])]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(add(additive_identity,X1),X2)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | less_or_equal(additive_identity,add(X1,X2))
    | less_or_equal(add(X1,X2),additive_identity) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(a,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(a,additive_identity)
    | less_or_equal(add(additive_identity,additive_identity),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,hypothesis,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(a,X2)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,add(additive_identity,a))
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,additive_identity)
    | less_or_equal(additive_identity,add(additive_identity,X1)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(a,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(a,additive_identity)
    | less_or_equal(additive_identity,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_63]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,add(a,a)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_less_or_equal_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,hypothesis,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(a,X1)
    | less_or_equal(additive_identity,X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]),c_0_48])]),c_0_66]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,X2)
    | less_or_equal(X1,add(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,add(a,a)),
    c_0_67 ).

cnf(c_0_71,hypothesis,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,X1)
    | less_or_equal(additive_identity,add(X1,a)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_69]),c_0_48])]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_71]),c_0_29])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : FLD059-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/5.41  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/5.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/5.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/5.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/5.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/5.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/5.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/5.41  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:46:09 UTC 2026
% 0.13/5.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/5.41  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/5.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/5.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/5.58  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.18/5.58  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/5.58  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/5.58  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/5.58  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/5.58  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/5.58  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/5.58  % new_bool_3 with pid 3635295 completed with status 0
% 0.18/5.58  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.18/5.58  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/5.58  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/5.58  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/5.58  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/5.58  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.18/5.58  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/5.58  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/5.58  % partial match(1): FGUNF-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/5.58  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/5.58  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.18/5.58  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3635303 completed with status 0
% 0.18/5.58  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.18/5.58  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/5.58  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/5.58  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/5.58  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/5.58  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.18/5.58  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/5.58  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/5.58  % partial match(1): FGUNF-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/5.58  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/5.58  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.18/5.58  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.18/5.58  
% 0.18/5.58  % Proof found!
% 0.18/5.58  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/5.58  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/5.58  % Parsed axioms                        : 30
% 0.18/5.58  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7
% 0.18/5.58  % Initial clauses                      : 23
% 0.18/5.58  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.18/5.58  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 23
% 0.18/5.58  % Processed clauses                    : 169
% 0.18/5.58  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.18/5.58  % ...subsumed                          : 61
% 0.18/5.58  % ...remaining for further processing  : 108
% 0.18/5.58  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.18/5.58  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/5.58  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.18/5.58  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.18/5.58  % Generated clauses                    : 512
% 0.18/5.58  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 416
% 0.18/5.58  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.18/5.58  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.18/5.58  % Paramodulations                      : 512
% 0.18/5.58  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.18/5.58  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.18/5.58  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.18/5.58  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.18/5.58  % Total rewrite steps                  : 207
% 0.18/5.58  % ...of those cached                   : 199
% 0.18/5.58  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.18/5.58  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.18/5.58  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/5.58  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.18/5.58  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/5.58  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.18/5.58  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.18/5.58  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.18/5.58  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.18/5.58  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.18/5.58  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.18/5.58  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.18/5.58  % Current number of processed clauses  : 106
% 0.18/5.58  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.18/5.58  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/5.58  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.18/5.58  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 97
% 0.18/5.58  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 267
% 0.18/5.58  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1091
% 0.18/5.58  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/5.58  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.18/5.58  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 843
% 0.18/5.58  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 786
% 0.18/5.58  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 64
% 0.18/5.58  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.18/5.58  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/5.58  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.18/5.58  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.18/5.58  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.18/5.58  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/5.58  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 7645
% 0.18/5.58  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 93
% 0.18/5.58  
% 0.18/5.58  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/5.58  % User time                : 0.020 s
% 0.18/5.58  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.18/5.58  % Total time               : 0.027 s
% 0.18/5.58  % Maximum resident set size: 3660 pages
% 0.18/5.58  
% 0.18/5.58  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/5.58  % User time                : 0.023 s
% 0.18/5.58  % System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.18/5.58  % Total time               : 0.036 s
% 0.18/5.58  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.18/5.58  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------