↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : FLD059-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 02:28:34 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 96.46s 96.71s
% Output   : Refutation 96.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : FLD059-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun  6 12:32:28 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 96.46/96.71  
% 96.46/96.71  SPASS V 3.9 
% 96.46/96.71  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 96.46/96.71  % SZS status Theorem
% 96.46/96.71  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 96.46/96.71  SPASS derived 26024 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 17014 clauses.
% 96.46/96.71  SPASS allocated 101903 KBytes.
% 96.46/96.71  SPASS spent	0:1:34.27 on the problem.
% 96.46/96.71  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 96.46/96.71  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 96.46/96.71  		0:00:00.38 for inferences.
% 96.46/96.71  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 96.46/96.71  		0:1:33.61 for the reduction.
% 96.46/96.71  
% 96.46/96.71  
% 96.46/96.71  Here is a proof with depth 7, length 60 :
% 96.46/96.71  % SZS output start Refutation
% 96.46/96.71  1[0:Inp] ||  -> defined(a)*.
% 96.46/96.71  2[0:Inp] ||  -> defined(u__dfg)*.
% 96.46/96.71  3[0:Inp] ||  -> less_or_equal(additive_identity,a)*r.
% 96.46/96.71  4[0:Inp] ||  -> equalish(add(a,a),u__dfg)*l.
% 96.46/96.71  5[0:Inp] || less_or_equal(additive_identity,u__dfg)*r -> .
% 96.46/96.71  7[0:Inp] defined(u) ||  -> equalish(add(additive_identity,u),u)*l.
% 96.46/96.71  8[0:Inp] defined(u) ||  -> equalish(add(u,additive_inverse(u)),additive_identity)*l.
% 96.46/96.71  9[0:Inp] defined(u) defined(v) ||  -> equalish(add(v,u),add(u,v))*.
% 96.46/96.71  15[0:Inp] defined(u) defined(v) ||  -> defined(add(v,u))*.
% 96.46/96.71  16[0:Inp] ||  -> defined(additive_identity)*.
% 96.46/96.71  17[0:Inp] defined(u) ||  -> defined(additive_inverse(u))*.
% 96.46/96.71  21[0:Inp] || less_or_equal(u,v)*+ less_or_equal(v,u)* -> equalish(v,u).
% 96.46/96.71  22[0:Inp] || less_or_equal(u,v)* less_or_equal(v,w)* -> less_or_equal(u,w)*.
% 96.46/96.71  23[0:Inp] defined(u) defined(v) ||  -> less_or_equal(u,v)* less_or_equal(v,u)*.
% 96.46/96.71  24[0:Inp] defined(u) || less_or_equal(v,w) -> less_or_equal(add(v,u),add(w,u))*.
% 96.46/96.71  27[0:Inp] || equalish(u,v)* -> equalish(v,u).
% 96.46/96.71  28[0:Inp] || equalish(u,v)* equalish(v,w)* -> equalish(u,w)*.
% 96.46/96.71  29[0:Inp] defined(u) || equalish(v,w) -> equalish(add(v,u),add(w,u))*.
% 96.46/96.71  31[0:Inp] || equalish(u,v)*+ less_or_equal(u,w)* -> less_or_equal(v,w)*.
% 96.46/96.71  34[0:Res:3.0,31.0] || equalish(additive_identity,u)*+ -> less_or_equal(u,a)*.
% 96.46/96.71  38[0:Res:3.0,24.1] defined(u) ||  -> less_or_equal(add(additive_identity,u),add(a,u))*r.
% 96.46/96.71  39[0:Res:23.2,5.0] defined(additive_identity) defined(u__dfg) ||  -> less_or_equal(u__dfg,additive_identity)*l.
% 96.46/96.71  40[0:Res:31.2,5.0] || equalish(u,additive_identity)*+ less_or_equal(u,u__dfg)* -> .
% 96.46/96.71  42[0:Res:4.0,27.0] ||  -> equalish(u__dfg,add(a,a))*r.
% 96.46/96.71  46[0:MRR:39.0,39.1,16.0,2.0] ||  -> less_or_equal(u__dfg,additive_identity)*l.
% 96.46/96.71  66[0:Res:7.1,27.0] defined(u) ||  -> equalish(u,add(additive_identity,u))*r.
% 96.46/96.71  70[0:NCh:28.2,28.0,27.0,7.1] defined(u) || equalish(u,v)*+ -> equalish(v,add(additive_identity,u))*.
% 96.46/96.71  81[0:OCh:28.1,28.0,66.1,8.1] defined(additive_inverse(additive_identity)) defined(additive_identity) ||  -> equalish(additive_inverse(additive_identity),additive_identity)*l.
% 96.46/96.71  87[0:SSi:81.1,81.0,16.0,17.1,16.0] ||  -> equalish(additive_inverse(additive_identity),additive_identity)*l.
% 96.46/96.71  88[0:Res:87.0,27.0] ||  -> equalish(additive_identity,additive_inverse(additive_identity))*r.
% 96.46/96.71  104[0:Res:88.0,34.0] ||  -> less_or_equal(additive_inverse(additive_identity),a)*l.
% 96.46/96.71  116[0:NCh:28.2,28.0,9.2,27.0] defined(u) defined(v) || equalish(add(u,v),w)*+ -> equalish(w,add(v,u))*.
% 96.46/96.71  171[0:Fac:23.2,23.3] defined(u) defined(u) ||  -> less_or_equal(u,u)*.
% 96.46/96.71  234[0:Obv:171.0] defined(u) ||  -> less_or_equal(u,u)*.
% 96.46/96.71  316[0:NCh:28.2,28.0,40.0,4.0] || equalish(u__dfg,additive_identity) less_or_equal(add(a,a),u__dfg)*l -> .
% 96.46/96.71  399[0:OCh:28.1,28.0,29.2,7.1] defined(u) defined(u) || equalish(v,additive_identity) -> equalish(add(v,u),u)*l.
% 96.46/96.71  408[0:Obv:399.0] defined(u) || equalish(v,additive_identity) -> equalish(add(v,u),u)*l.
% 96.46/96.71  649[0:Res:42.0,31.0] || less_or_equal(u__dfg,u)*+ -> less_or_equal(add(a,a),u)*.
% 96.46/96.71  654[0:Res:7.1,31.0] defined(u) || less_or_equal(add(additive_identity,u),v)* -> less_or_equal(u,v).
% 96.46/96.71  656[0:Res:87.0,31.0] || less_or_equal(additive_inverse(additive_identity),u)* -> less_or_equal(additive_identity,u).
% 96.46/96.71  781[0:NCh:22.2,22.0,656.0,104.0] || less_or_equal(a,u)* -> less_or_equal(additive_identity,u).
% 96.46/96.71  1256[0:Res:4.0,70.1] defined(add(a,a)) ||  -> equalish(u__dfg,add(additive_identity,add(a,a)))*r.
% 96.46/96.71  1367[0:SSi:1256.0,15.0,1.0,1.2] ||  -> equalish(u__dfg,add(additive_identity,add(a,a)))*r.
% 96.46/96.71  1918[0:Res:38.1,654.1] defined(u) defined(u) ||  -> less_or_equal(u,add(a,u))*r.
% 96.46/96.71  1949[0:Obv:1918.0] defined(u) ||  -> less_or_equal(u,add(a,u))*r.
% 96.46/96.71  2058[0:Res:1367.0,27.0] ||  -> equalish(add(additive_identity,add(a,a)),u__dfg)*l.
% 96.46/96.71  4120[0:Res:2058.0,116.2] defined(additive_identity) defined(add(a,a)) ||  -> equalish(u__dfg,add(add(a,a),additive_identity))*r.
% 96.46/96.71  4266[0:SSi:4120.1,4120.0,15.0,1.0,1.0,16.2] ||  -> equalish(u__dfg,add(add(a,a),additive_identity))*r.
% 96.46/96.71  5738[0:OCh:28.1,28.0,4266.0,408.2] defined(additive_identity) || equalish(add(a,a),additive_identity)*l -> equalish(u__dfg,additive_identity).
% 96.46/96.71  5755[0:SSi:5738.0,16.0] || equalish(add(a,a),additive_identity)*l -> equalish(u__dfg,additive_identity).
% 96.46/96.71  22620[0:Res:1949.1,781.0] defined(a) ||  -> less_or_equal(additive_identity,add(a,a))*r.
% 96.46/96.71  22690[0:SSi:22620.0,1.0] ||  -> less_or_equal(additive_identity,add(a,a))*r.
% 96.46/96.71  22889[0:Res:22690.0,21.0] || less_or_equal(add(a,a),additive_identity)*l -> equalish(add(a,a),additive_identity).
% 96.46/96.71  33200[0:Res:46.0,649.0] ||  -> less_or_equal(add(a,a),additive_identity)*l.
% 96.46/96.71  33210[0:Res:234.1,649.0] defined(u__dfg) ||  -> less_or_equal(add(a,a),u__dfg)*l.
% 96.46/96.71  33358[0:MRR:22889.0,33200.0] ||  -> equalish(add(a,a),additive_identity)*l.
% 96.46/96.71  33369[0:MRR:5755.0,33358.0] ||  -> equalish(u__dfg,additive_identity)*l.
% 96.46/96.71  33382[0:MRR:316.0,33369.0] || less_or_equal(add(a,a),u__dfg)*l -> .
% 96.46/96.71  33536[0:SSi:33210.0,2.0] ||  -> less_or_equal(add(a,a),u__dfg)*l.
% 96.46/96.71  33537[0:MRR:33536.0,33382.0] ||  -> .
% 96.46/96.71  % SZS output end Refutation
% 96.46/96.71  Formulae used in the proof : a_is_defined u_is_defined less_or_equal_3 add_equals_u_4 not_less_or_equal_5 existence_of_identity_addition existence_of_inverse_addition commutativity_addition well_definedness_of_addition well_definedness_of_additive_identity well_definedness_of_additive_inverse antisymmetry_of_order_relation transitivity_of_order_relation totality_of_order_relation compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition symmetry_of_equality transitivity_of_equality compatibility_of_equality_and_addition compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation
% 96.46/96.71  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------