↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : FLD065-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:11:41 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   31 (  18   ~;  13   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn   7   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(existence_of_identity_addition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] :
      ( ~ defined(VAR_0)
      | sum(additive_identity,VAR_0,VAR_0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',existence_of_identity_addition) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    ( ~ defined(A)
    | sum(additive_identity,A,A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[existence_of_identity_addition]) ).

fof(existence_of_inverse_addition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] :
      ( ~ defined(VAR_0)
      | sum(additive_inverse(VAR_0),VAR_0,additive_identity) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',existence_of_inverse_addition) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    ( ~ defined(A)
    | sum(additive_inverse(A),A,additive_identity) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[existence_of_inverse_addition]) ).

fof(compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4] :
      ( ~ sum(VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_1)
      | ~ sum(VAR_2,VAR_4,VAR_0)
      | ~ less_or_equal(VAR_2,VAR_3)
      | less_or_equal(VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    ( ~ sum(D,E,B)
    | ~ sum(C,E,A)
    | ~ less_or_equal(C,D)
    | less_or_equal(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition]) ).

fof(a_is_defined,axiom,
    defined(a),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    defined(a),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a_is_defined]) ).

fof(less_or_equal_2,axiom,
    less_or_equal(additive_inverse(a),additive_identity),
    file('theBenchmark.p',less_or_equal_2) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    less_or_equal(additive_inverse(a),additive_identity),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[less_or_equal_2]) ).

fof(not_less_or_equal_3,axiom,
    ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,a),
    file('theBenchmark.p',not_less_or_equal_3) ).

cnf(c_29,plain,
    ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,a),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[not_less_or_equal_3]) ).

cnf(c_97,plain,
    sum(additive_inverse(a),a,additive_identity),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_98,plain,
    sum(additive_identity,a,a),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_269,plain,
    ( ~ sum(B,C,a)
    | ~ sum(A,C,additive_identity)
    | ~ less_or_equal(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_29]) ).

cnf(c_270,plain,
    ( ~ sum(additive_identity,A,a)
    | ~ sum(additive_inverse(a),A,additive_identity) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_269,c_28]) ).

cnf(c_271,plain,
    ~ sum(additive_inverse(a),a,additive_identity),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_270,c_98]) ).

cnf(c_268,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_271]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : FLD065-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.44  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.44  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 02:36:26 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.45  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.17/0.45  % Process 2449065 was started by sandbox2 on n026,
% 0.17/0.45  % Sun Sep 27 02:36:26 2026
% 0.17/0.45  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.17/0.45  
% 0.17/0.45  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.22/0.50  
% 0.22/0.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.50  
% 0.22/0.50  % Proof 1 at 0.03 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.22/0.50  % Length of proof is 9.
% 0.22/0.50  % Level of proof is 2.
% 0.22/0.50  % Maximum clause weight is 19.000.
% 0.22/0.50  % Given clauses 69.
% 0.22/0.50  
% 0.22/0.50  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------