↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : FLD067-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 02:28:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.54s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : FLD067-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 02:21:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.54  
% 0.19/0.54  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.54  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.54  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.54  SPASS derived 628 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 404 clauses.
% 0.19/0.54  SPASS allocated 76330 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.54  SPASS spent	0:00:00.19 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.54  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.54  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.54  		0:00:00.12 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.54  
% 0.19/0.54  
% 0.19/0.54  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 24 :
% 0.19/0.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.54  1[0:Inp] ||  -> defined(a)*.
% 0.19/0.54  3[0:Inp] ||  -> less_or_equal(a,b)*l.
% 0.19/0.54  4[0:Inp] || less_or_equal(additive_identity,add(b,additive_inverse(a)))*r -> .
% 0.19/0.54  6[0:Inp] defined(u) ||  -> equalish(add(additive_identity,u),u)*l.
% 0.19/0.54  7[0:Inp] defined(u) ||  -> equalish(add(u,additive_inverse(u)),additive_identity)*l.
% 0.19/0.54  15[0:Inp] ||  -> defined(additive_identity)*.
% 0.19/0.54  16[0:Inp] defined(u) ||  -> defined(additive_inverse(u))*.
% 0.19/0.54  23[0:Inp] defined(u) || less_or_equal(v,w) -> less_or_equal(add(v,u),add(w,u))*.
% 0.19/0.54  26[0:Inp] || equalish(u,v)* -> equalish(v,u).
% 0.19/0.54  27[0:Inp] || equalish(u,v)* equalish(v,w)* -> equalish(u,w)*.
% 0.19/0.54  30[0:Inp] || equalish(u,v)*+ less_or_equal(u,w)* -> less_or_equal(v,w)*.
% 0.19/0.54  35[0:Res:3.0,23.1] defined(u) ||  -> less_or_equal(add(a,u),add(b,u))*l.
% 0.19/0.54  37[0:Res:30.2,4.0] || equalish(u,additive_identity)* less_or_equal(u,add(b,additive_inverse(a)))*+ -> .
% 0.19/0.54  52[0:Res:6.1,26.0] defined(u) ||  -> equalish(u,add(additive_identity,u))*r.
% 0.19/0.54  53[0:Res:7.1,26.0] defined(u) ||  -> equalish(additive_identity,add(u,additive_inverse(u)))*r.
% 0.19/0.54  63[0:OCh:27.1,27.0,52.1,7.1] defined(additive_inverse(additive_identity)) defined(additive_identity) ||  -> equalish(additive_inverse(additive_identity),additive_identity)*l.
% 0.19/0.54  66[0:SSi:63.1,63.0,15.0,16.1,15.0] ||  -> equalish(additive_inverse(additive_identity),additive_identity)*l.
% 0.19/0.54  68[0:NCh:27.2,27.0,66.0,26.0] || equalish(additive_identity,u)*+ -> equalish(u,additive_inverse(additive_identity))*.
% 0.19/0.54  228[0:Res:53.1,68.0] defined(u) ||  -> equalish(add(u,additive_inverse(u)),additive_inverse(additive_identity))*l.
% 0.19/0.54  787[0:Res:35.1,37.1] defined(additive_inverse(a)) || equalish(add(a,additive_inverse(a)),additive_identity)*l -> .
% 0.19/0.54  803[0:SSi:787.0,16.0,1.1] || equalish(add(a,additive_inverse(a)),additive_identity)*l -> .
% 0.19/0.54  812[0:NCh:27.2,27.0,803.0,228.1] defined(a) || equalish(additive_inverse(additive_identity),additive_identity)*l -> .
% 0.19/0.54  816[0:SSi:812.0,1.0] || equalish(additive_inverse(additive_identity),additive_identity)*l -> .
% 0.19/0.54  817[0:MRR:816.0,66.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.54  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.54  Formulae used in the proof : a_is_defined less_or_equal_3 not_less_or_equal_4 existence_of_identity_addition existence_of_inverse_addition well_definedness_of_additive_identity well_definedness_of_additive_inverse compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition symmetry_of_equality transitivity_of_equality compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation
% 0.19/0.54  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------