↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : FLD067-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:11:42 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   32 (  19   ~;  13   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn   9   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(existence_of_inverse_addition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] :
      ( ~ defined(VAR_0)
      | sum(additive_inverse(VAR_0),VAR_0,additive_identity) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',existence_of_inverse_addition) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    ( ~ defined(A)
    | sum(additive_inverse(A),A,additive_identity) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[existence_of_inverse_addition]) ).

fof(commutativity_addition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( ~ sum(VAR_1,VAR_0,VAR_2)
      | sum(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_addition) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    ( ~ sum(B,A,C)
    | sum(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_addition]) ).

fof(compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3,VAR_4] :
      ( ~ sum(VAR_3,VAR_4,VAR_1)
      | ~ sum(VAR_2,VAR_4,VAR_0)
      | ~ less_or_equal(VAR_2,VAR_3)
      | less_or_equal(VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    ( ~ sum(D,E,B)
    | ~ sum(C,E,A)
    | ~ less_or_equal(C,D)
    | less_or_equal(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition]) ).

fof(a_is_defined,axiom,
    defined(a),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    defined(a),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a_is_defined]) ).

fof(less_or_equal_4,axiom,
    less_or_equal(a,b),
    file('theBenchmark.p',less_or_equal_4) ).

cnf(c_30,plain,
    less_or_equal(a,b),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[less_or_equal_4]) ).

fof(sum_5,axiom,
    sum(b,additive_inverse(a),u),
    file('theBenchmark.p',sum_5) ).

cnf(c_31,plain,
    sum(b,additive_inverse(a),u),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[sum_5]) ).

fof(not_less_or_equal_6,axiom,
    ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,u),
    file('theBenchmark.p',not_less_or_equal_6) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,u),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[not_less_or_equal_6]) ).

cnf(c_100,plain,
    sum(additive_inverse(a),a,additive_identity),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_4]) ).

cnf(c_207,plain,
    ( ~ sum(B,C,u)
    | ~ sum(A,C,additive_identity)
    | ~ less_or_equal(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_32]) ).

cnf(c_208,plain,
    ( ~ sum(b,A,u)
    | ~ sum(a,A,additive_identity) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_207,c_30]) ).

cnf(c_152,plain,
    ~ sum(a,additive_inverse(a),additive_identity),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_208,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_209,plain,
    ~ sum(additive_inverse(a),a,additive_identity),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_152]) ).

cnf(c_206,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_209]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : FLD067-4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.51  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.51  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.51  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.51  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.51  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.51  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.51  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.51  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 02:35:55 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.51  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.51  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.51  % Process 104912 was started by sandbox on n003,
% 0.09/0.51  % Sun Sep 27 02:35:55 2026
% 0.09/0.51  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.52  
% 0.09/0.52  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/0.53  
% 0.09/0.53  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.53  
% 0.09/0.53  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.09/0.53  % Length of proof is 10.
% 0.09/0.53  % Level of proof is 2.
% 0.09/0.53  % Maximum clause weight is 19.000.
% 0.09/0.53  % Given clauses 59.
% 0.09/0.53  
% 0.09/0.53  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------