%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : FLD070-2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xDZ4CUio3a true
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:33:24 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 6.39s 1.48s
% Output : Refutation 6.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : FLD070-2 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xDZ4CUio3a true
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 18:30:38 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.12/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.12/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.12/0.34 % Running in FO mode
% 0.43/0.58 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.43/0.58 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.43/0.58 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.48/0.66 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.49/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.49/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.49/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.49/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.49/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.49/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 6.39/1.48 % Solved by fo/fo13.sh.
% 6.39/1.48 % done 782 iterations in 0.765s
% 6.39/1.48 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 6.39/1.48 % SZS output start Refutation
% 6.39/1.48 thf(defined_type, type, defined: $i > $o).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(additive_identity_type, type, additive_identity: $i).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(add_type, type, add: $i > $i > $i).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(less_or_equal_type, type, less_or_equal: $i > $i > $o).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(equalish_type, type, equalish: $i > $i > $o).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(not_less_or_equal_7, conjecture, (less_or_equal @ additive_identity @ c)).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 6.39/1.48 (~( less_or_equal @ additive_identity @ c )),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [not_less_or_equal_7])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain, (~ (less_or_equal @ additive_identity @ c)),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(totality_of_order_relation, axiom,
% 6.39/1.48 (( less_or_equal @ X @ Y ) | ( less_or_equal @ Y @ X ) |
% 6.39/1.48 ( ~( defined @ X ) ) | ( ~( defined @ Y ) ))).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 6.39/1.48 ( (less_or_equal @ X0 @ X1)
% 6.39/1.48 | (less_or_equal @ X1 @ X0)
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (defined @ X0)
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (defined @ X1))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [totality_of_order_relation])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl180, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i]:
% 6.39/1.48 (~ (defined @ X0) | ~ (defined @ X0) | (less_or_equal @ X0 @ X0))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('eq_fact', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl182, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i]: ( (less_or_equal @ X0 @ X0) | ~ (defined @ X0))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl180])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(add_equals_c_4, conjecture, (~( equalish @ ( add @ a @ b ) @ c ))).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture, (equalish @ ( add @ a @ b ) @ c),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [add_equals_c_4])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl30, plain, ( (equalish @ (add @ a @ b) @ c)),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(symmetry_of_equality, axiom,
% 6.39/1.48 (( equalish @ X @ Y ) | ( ~( equalish @ Y @ X ) ))).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ( (equalish @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (equalish @ X1 @ X0))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_equality])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl37, plain, ( (equalish @ c @ (add @ a @ b))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl30, zip_derived_cl21])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation, axiom,
% 6.39/1.48 (( less_or_equal @ Y @ Z ) | ( ~( less_or_equal @ X @ Z ) ) |
% 6.39/1.48 ( ~( equalish @ X @ Y ) ))).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 6.39/1.48 ( (less_or_equal @ X0 @ X1)
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (less_or_equal @ X2 @ X1)
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (equalish @ X2 @ X0))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf', [status(esa)],
% 6.39/1.48 [compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl64, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i]:
% 6.39/1.48 ( (less_or_equal @ (add @ a @ b) @ X0) | ~ (less_or_equal @ c @ X0))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl37, zip_derived_cl25])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl454, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 ((~ (defined @ c) | (less_or_equal @ (add @ a @ b) @ c))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl182, zip_derived_cl64])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(c_is_defined, axiom, (defined @ c)).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain, ( (defined @ c)),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [c_is_defined])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl457, plain, ( (less_or_equal @ (add @ a @ b) @ c)),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl454, zip_derived_cl29])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(less_or_equal_5, conjecture,
% 6.39/1.48 (~( less_or_equal @ additive_identity @ a ))).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zf_stmt_2, negated_conjecture, (less_or_equal @ additive_identity @ a),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [less_or_equal_5])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl31, plain, ( (less_or_equal @ additive_identity @ a)),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition, axiom,
% 6.39/1.48 (( less_or_equal @ ( add @ X @ Z ) @ ( add @ Y @ Z ) ) |
% 6.39/1.48 ( ~( defined @ Z ) ) | ( ~( less_or_equal @ X @ Y ) ))).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 6.39/1.48 ( (less_or_equal @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ (add @ X2 @ X1))
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (defined @ X1)
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (less_or_equal @ X0 @ X2))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf', [status(esa)],
% 6.39/1.48 [compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl205, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i]:
% 6.39/1.48 ( (less_or_equal @ (add @ additive_identity @ X0) @ (add @ a @ X0))
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (defined @ X0))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl31, zip_derived_cl18])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(existence_of_identity_addition, axiom,
% 6.39/1.48 (( equalish @ ( add @ additive_identity @ X ) @ X ) | ( ~( defined @ X ) ))).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i]:
% 6.39/1.48 ( (equalish @ (add @ additive_identity @ X0) @ X0) | ~ (defined @ X0))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [existence_of_identity_addition])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 6.39/1.48 ( (less_or_equal @ X0 @ X1)
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (less_or_equal @ X2 @ X1)
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (equalish @ X2 @ X0))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf', [status(esa)],
% 6.39/1.48 [compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl58, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 6.39/1.48 (~ (defined @ X0)
% 6.39/1.48 | (less_or_equal @ X0 @ X1)
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (less_or_equal @ (add @ additive_identity @ X0) @ X1))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl25])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl3694, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i]:
% 6.39/1.48 (~ (defined @ X0)
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (defined @ X0)
% 6.39/1.48 | (less_or_equal @ X0 @ (add @ a @ X0)))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl205, zip_derived_cl58])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl3711, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i]: ( (less_or_equal @ X0 @ (add @ a @ X0)) | ~ (defined @ X0))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3694])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(less_or_equal_6, conjecture,
% 6.39/1.48 (~( less_or_equal @ additive_identity @ b ))).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zf_stmt_3, negated_conjecture, (less_or_equal @ additive_identity @ b),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [less_or_equal_6])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain, ( (less_or_equal @ additive_identity @ b)),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_3])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(transitivity_of_order_relation, axiom,
% 6.39/1.48 (( less_or_equal @ X @ Z ) | ( ~( less_or_equal @ X @ Y ) ) |
% 6.39/1.48 ( ~( less_or_equal @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 6.39/1.48 ( (less_or_equal @ X0 @ X1)
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (less_or_equal @ X0 @ X2)
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (less_or_equal @ X2 @ X1))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [transitivity_of_order_relation])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl43, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i]:
% 6.39/1.48 ( (less_or_equal @ additive_identity @ X0)
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (less_or_equal @ b @ X0))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl32, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl3782, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 ((~ (defined @ b) | (less_or_equal @ additive_identity @ (add @ a @ b)))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3711, zip_derived_cl43])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(b_is_defined, axiom, (defined @ b)).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl28, plain, ( (defined @ b)),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [b_is_defined])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl3812, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 ( (less_or_equal @ additive_identity @ (add @ a @ b))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3782, zip_derived_cl28])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 6.39/1.48 ( (less_or_equal @ X0 @ X1)
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (less_or_equal @ X0 @ X2)
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (less_or_equal @ X2 @ X1))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [transitivity_of_order_relation])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl3854, plain,
% 6.39/1.48 (![X0 : $i]:
% 6.39/1.48 ( (less_or_equal @ additive_identity @ X0)
% 6.39/1.48 | ~ (less_or_equal @ (add @ a @ b) @ X0))),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3812, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl4191, plain, ( (less_or_equal @ additive_identity @ c)),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)],
% 6.39/1.48 [zip_derived_cl457, zip_derived_cl3854])).
% 6.39/1.48 thf(zip_derived_cl4198, plain, ($false),
% 6.39/1.48 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl4191])).
% 6.39/1.48
% 6.39/1.48 % SZS output end Refutation
% 6.39/1.48
% 6.39/1.48
% 6.39/1.48 % Terminating...
% 6.39/1.53 % Runner terminated.
% 6.39/1.54 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------