↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : FLD071-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:22:58 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   48 (  21 unt;   4 nHn;  48 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   97 (   0 equ;  48 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(totality_of_order_relation,axiom,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',totality_of_order_relation) ).

cnf(u_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(u),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_is_defined) ).

cnf(not_less_or_equal_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,u),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_less_or_equal_7) ).

cnf(symmetry_of_equality,axiom,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,X1)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',symmetry_of_equality) ).

cnf(transitivity_of_order_relation,axiom,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X3)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',transitivity_of_order_relation) ).

cnf(well_definedness_of_additive_identity,axiom,
    defined(additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',well_definedness_of_additive_identity) ).

cnf(compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation,axiom,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation) ).

cnf(multiply_equals_u_6,negated_conjecture,
    equalish(multiply(a,b),u),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply_equals_u_6) ).

cnf(antisymmetry_of_order_relation,axiom,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',antisymmetry_of_order_relation) ).

cnf(transitivity_of_equality,axiom,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',transitivity_of_equality) ).

cnf(compatibility_of_order_relation_and_multiplication,axiom,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,X2)
    | ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,X1)
    | less_or_equal(additive_identity,multiply(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',compatibility_of_order_relation_and_multiplication) ).

cnf(less_or_equal_5,negated_conjecture,
    less_or_equal(additive_identity,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_or_equal_5) ).

cnf(less_or_equal_4,negated_conjecture,
    less_or_equal(additive_identity,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_or_equal_4) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[totality_of_order_relation]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    defined(u),
    u_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,u),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_less_or_equal_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,X1)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[symmetry_of_equality]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X3)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitivity_of_order_relation]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    ( ~ defined(X1)
    | less_or_equal(X1,u)
    | less_or_equal(u,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    defined(additive_identity),
    well_definedness_of_additive_identity ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,u),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,X1)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    equalish(multiply(a,b),u),
    multiply_equals_u_6 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X3)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    less_or_equal(u,additive_identity),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2)
    | less_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    equalish(u,multiply(a,b)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[antisymmetry_of_order_relation]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X1,u)
    | less_or_equal(X1,additive_identity) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(u,X1)
    | less_or_equal(multiply(a,b),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    less_or_equal(u,u),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitivity_of_equality]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(X2,X1)
    | ~ less_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    less_or_equal(multiply(a,b),additive_identity),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,X2)
    | ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,X1)
    | less_or_equal(additive_identity,multiply(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[compatibility_of_order_relation_and_multiplication]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,multiply(a,b))
    | equalish(additive_identity,multiply(a,b)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,X2)
    | ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,X1)
    | less_or_equal(additive_identity,multiply(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    less_or_equal(additive_identity,b),
    less_or_equal_5 ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    less_or_equal(additive_identity,a),
    less_or_equal_4 ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,multiply(a,b))
    | equalish(X1,u) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    equalish(additive_identity,multiply(a,b)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_40]),c_0_41])]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    equalish(additive_identity,u),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    equalish(u,additive_identity),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(u,X1)
    | less_or_equal(additive_identity,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_32]),c_0_21]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : FLD071-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 15:47:37 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.45  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % new_bool_3 with pid 2644069 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.45  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.45  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2644077 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.45  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.45  % Search class: FGUNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.45  
% 0.15/0.45  % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.45  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.45  % Parsed axioms                        : 34
% 0.15/0.45  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7
% 0.15/0.45  % Initial clauses                      : 27
% 0.15/0.45  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 27
% 0.15/0.45  % Processed clauses                    : 141
% 0.15/0.45  % ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.15/0.45  % ...subsumed                          : 27
% 0.15/0.45  % ...remaining for further processing  : 111
% 0.15/0.45  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.15/0.45  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.15/0.45  % Generated clauses                    : 346
% 0.15/0.45  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 236
% 0.15/0.45  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Paramodulations                      : 346
% 0.15/0.45  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Total rewrite steps                  : 142
% 0.15/0.45  % ...of those cached                   : 110
% 0.15/0.45  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.45  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.45  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.45  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.45  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.45  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.45  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45  % Current number of processed clauses  : 108
% 0.15/0.45  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 37
% 0.15/0.45  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.45  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.15/0.45  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 70
% 0.15/0.45  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 120
% 0.15/0.45  % ...number of literals in the above   : 369
% 0.15/0.45  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.15/0.45  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 358
% 0.15/0.45  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 331
% 0.15/0.45  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 26
% 0.15/0.45  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.15/0.45  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.15/0.45  % BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.15/0.45  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.45  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 4604
% 0.15/0.45  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 93
% 0.15/0.45  
% 0.15/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.45  % User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.45  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.45  % Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.15/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 3660 pages
% 0.15/0.45  
% 0.15/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.45  % User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.45  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.45  % Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.15/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.45  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------