↑ Up

CARINE---0.734.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : FLD071-4 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory   : 2006MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 19:26:19 EST 2010

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.81s
% Output   : Refutation 0.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP26653/FLD/FLD071-4+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 185] [nf = 0] [nu = 113] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 349443] [nf = 72] [nu = 270655] [ut = 8241]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% +================================================+
% |                                                |
% | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. |
% |                                                |
% +================================================+
% Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof:
% ============================================
% Base Clauses:
% -------------
% B0: product_3(a_0(),b_0(),u_0())
% B29: ~less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),x2) | ~less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),x1) | ~product_3(x1,x2,x0) | less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),x0)
% Unit Clauses:
% --------------
% U1: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 b nc > less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),b_0())
% U2: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 b nc > less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),a_0())
% U3: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 b nc > ~less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),u_0())
% U8272: < d3 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 > less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),u_0())
% --------------- Start of Proof ---------------
% Derivation of unit clause U1:
% less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),b_0()) ....... U1
% Derivation of unit clause U2:
% less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),a_0()) ....... U2
% Derivation of unit clause U3:
% ~less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),u_0()) ....... U3
% Derivation of unit clause U8272:
% product_3(a_0(),b_0(),u_0()) ....... B0
% ~less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),x2) | ~less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),x1) | ~product_3(x1,x2,x0) | less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),x0) ....... B29
%  ~less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(), b_0()) | ~less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(), a_0()) | less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(), u_0()) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B29:L2]
%  less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),b_0()) ....... U1
%   ~less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(), a_0()) | less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(), u_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U1:L0]
%   less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),a_0()) ....... U2
%    less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(), u_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U2:L0]
% Derivation of the empty clause:
% less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),u_0()) ....... U8272
% ~less_or_equal_2(additive_identity_0(),u_0()) ....... U3
%  [] ....... R1 [U8272:L0, U3:L0]
% --------------- End of Proof ---------------
% PROOF FOUND!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 350144
% 	resolvents: 350060	factors: 84
% Number of unit clauses generated: 270777
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 77.33
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 10	[1] = 64	[2] = 8167	[3] = 32	
% Total = 8273
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 270777	[2] = 79278	[3] = 89	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] defined_1		(+)7845	(-)0
% [1] less_or_equal_2	(+)3	(-)3
% [2] product_3		(+)187	(-)0
% [3] sum_3		(+)234	(-)1
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)8269	(-)4
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 8273
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 2080
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 350147
% Number of unification failures: 27887
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 240
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1814
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1229
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 9
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 231540
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 107664
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 8
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 4
% Number of states in UCFA table: 5414
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 54305
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.07
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.10
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 47
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 378034
% ConstructUnitClause() = 239803
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.31 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: inf
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 1 secs
% CPU time: 0.80 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------