↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : GEG016^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:49:27 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.30s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   36
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  148 (  73 unt;   0 typ;   7 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  983 ( 165 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives : 1767 ( 115   ~; 127   |;  63   &;1175   @)
%                                         (   7 <=>; 125  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    4 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   24 (  24   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   92 (  87 usr;  23 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         ( 129  !!;  26  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :  352 (  12 sgn  87   !;   2   ?; 352   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    mu: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(type_def_7,type,
    reg: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    meq_ind: mu > mu > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    meq_prop: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    mnot: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    mor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    mand: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    mimplies: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    mimplied: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    mequiv: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    mxor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    mforall_ind: ( mu > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    mforall_prop: ( ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    mexists_ind: ( mu > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    mexists_prop: ( ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    mtrue: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    mfalse: $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_16,type,
    mbox: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_17,type,
    mdia: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_18,type,
    mreflexive: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_19,type,
    msymmetric: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_20,type,
    mserial: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_21,type,
    mtransitive: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_22,type,
    meuclidean: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_23,type,
    mpartially_functional: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_24,type,
    mfunctional: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_25,type,
    mweakly_dense: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_26,type,
    mweakly_connected: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_27,type,
    mweakly_directed: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_28,type,
    mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_29,type,
    minvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_30,type,
    msatisfiable: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_31,type,
    mcountersatisfiable: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_32,type,
    c: reg > reg > $o ).

thf(func_def_33,type,
    dc: reg > reg > $o ).

thf(func_def_34,type,
    p: reg > reg > $o ).

thf(func_def_35,type,
    eq: reg > reg > $o ).

thf(func_def_36,type,
    o: reg > reg > $o ).

thf(func_def_37,type,
    po: reg > reg > $o ).

thf(func_def_38,type,
    ec: reg > reg > $o ).

thf(func_def_39,type,
    pp: reg > reg > $o ).

thf(func_def_40,type,
    tpp: reg > reg > $o ).

thf(func_def_41,type,
    ntpp: reg > reg > $o ).

thf(func_def_42,type,
    catalunya: reg ).

thf(func_def_43,type,
    france: reg ).

thf(func_def_44,type,
    spain: reg ).

thf(func_def_45,type,
    paris: reg ).

thf(func_def_46,type,
    a: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_47,type,
    fool: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_48,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_49,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_50,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_51,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_52,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_53,type,
    vSIGMA: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_54,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_55,type,
    vOR: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_56,type,
    db2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_57,type,
    db3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_60,type,
    vEQ: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_61,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_62,type,
    db4: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_63,type,
    sK0: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_64,type,
    sK1: reg > reg ).

thf(func_def_65,type,
    sK2: reg > reg ).

thf(func_def_66,type,
    sK3: reg ).

thf(func_def_67,type,
    sK4: reg > reg ).

thf(func_def_68,type,
    sK5: reg > reg ).

thf(func_def_69,type,
    sK6: reg ).

thf(func_def_70,type,
    sK7: reg ).

thf(func_def_71,type,
    sK8: reg > reg ).

thf(func_def_72,type,
    sK9: reg > reg ).

thf(func_def_73,type,
    sK10: reg > reg ).

thf(func_def_74,type,
    sK11: reg > reg ).

thf(func_def_77,type,
    sK14: reg ).

thf(func_def_78,type,
    sK15: reg ).

thf(func_def_79,type,
    sK16: reg ).

thf(func_def_80,type,
    sK17: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_81,type,
    sK18: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(f16,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
        ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ~ ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
          | ( X1 @ X3 ) ) )
    = mbox ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mbox) ).

thf(f28,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
        ! [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) )
    = mvalid ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mvalid) ).

thf(f35,axiom,
    ( p
    = ( ^ [X0: reg,X1: reg] :
        ! [X2: reg] :
          ( ( c @ X2 @ X0 )
         => ( c @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL014^0.ax',p) ).

thf(f37,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: reg,X1: reg] :
        ? [X2: reg] :
          ( ( p @ X2 @ X0 )
          & ( p @ X2 @ X1 ) ) )
    = o ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL014^0.ax',o) ).

thf(f39,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: reg,X1: reg] :
          ( ( c @ X0 @ X1 )
          & ~ ( o @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )
    = ec ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL014^0.ax',ec) ).

thf(f47,axiom,
    ( mvalid
    @ ( mbox @ fool
      @ ^ [X0: $i] : ( ec @ spain @ france ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2) ).

thf(f49,conjecture,
    ( mvalid
    @ ( mbox @ fool
      @ ^ [X0: $i] :
        ! [X2: reg,X1: reg] :
          ( ( ( p @ X2 @ france )
            & ( p @ X1 @ spain ) )
         => ~ ( o @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

thf(f50,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mvalid
      @ ( mbox @ fool
        @ ^ [X0: $i] :
          ! [X2: reg,X1: reg] :
            ( ( ( p @ X2 @ france )
              & ( p @ X1 @ spain ) )
           => ~ ( o @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f49]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: reg,X1: reg] :
          ( ( c @ X0 @ X1 )
          & ~ ( o @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )
    = ec ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f39]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ( ec
    = ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
          ( ~ ( o @ Y0 @ Y1 )
          & ( c @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f51]) ).

thf(f55,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
        ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ~ ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
          | ( X1 @ X3 ) ) )
    = mbox ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
              ( ( Y1 @ Y3 )
              | ~ ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f55]) ).

thf(f74,plain,
    ( mvalid
    @ ( mbox @ fool
      @ ^ [X0: $i] : ( ec @ spain @ france ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f47]) ).

thf(f75,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( mvalid
      @ ( mbox @ fool
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( ec @ spain @ france ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f74]) ).

thf(f93,plain,
    ( p
    = ( ^ [X0: reg,X1: reg] :
        ! [X2: reg] :
          ( ( c @ X2 @ X0 )
         => ( c @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f35]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( p
    = ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
          ( !! @ reg
          @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
              ( ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f93]) ).

thf(f95,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: reg,X1: reg] :
        ? [X2: reg] :
          ( ( p @ X2 @ X0 )
          & ( p @ X2 @ X1 ) ) )
    = o ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f37]) ).

thf(f96,plain,
    ( o
    = ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
          ( ?? @ reg
          @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
              ( ( p @ Y2 @ Y1 )
              & ( p @ Y2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f95]) ).

thf(f121,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
        ! [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) )
    = mvalid ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f122,plain,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f121]) ).

thf(f136,plain,
    ~ ( mvalid
      @ ( mbox @ fool
        @ ^ [X0: $i] :
          ! [X1: reg,X2: reg] :
            ( ( ( p @ X1 @ france )
              & ( p @ X2 @ spain ) )
           => ~ ( o @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f50]) ).

thf(f137,plain,
    ( ( mvalid
      @ ( mbox @ fool
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ reg
            @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                    ( ( ( p @ Y1 @ spain )
                      & ( p @ Y2 @ france ) )
                   => ~ ( o @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f136]) ).

thf(f138,plain,
    ( ( mvalid
      @ ( mbox @ fool
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ reg
            @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                    ( ( ( p @ Y1 @ spain )
                      & ( p @ Y2 @ france ) )
                   => ~ ( o @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f137]) ).

thf(f141,plain,
    ( o
    = ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
          ( ?? @ reg
          @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
              ( ( p @ Y2 @ Y1 )
              & ( p @ Y2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f96]) ).

thf(f148,plain,
    ( p
    = ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
          ( !! @ reg
          @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
              ( ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).

thf(f154,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( mvalid
      @ ( mbox @ fool
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] : ( ec @ spain @ france ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).

thf(f171,plain,
    ( ec
    = ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
          ( ~ ( o @ Y0 @ Y1 )
          & ( c @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).

thf(f174,plain,
    ( mvalid
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

thf(f177,plain,
    ( ( mvalid
      @ ( mbox @ fool
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ reg
            @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                    ( ( ( p @ Y1 @ spain )
                      & ( p @ Y2 @ france ) )
                   => ~ ( o @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f138]) ).

thf(f181,plain,
    ( mbox
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
              ( ( Y1 @ Y3 )
              | ~ ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).

thf(f202,plain,
    ( o
    = ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
          ( ?? @ reg
          @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
              ( ( ^ [Y3: reg,Y4: reg] :
                    ( !! @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y5: reg] :
                        ( ( c @ Y5 @ Y3 )
                       => ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 ) ) )
                @ Y2
                @ Y1 )
              & ( ^ [Y3: reg,Y4: reg] :
                    ( !! @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y5: reg] :
                        ( ( c @ Y5 @ Y3 )
                       => ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 ) ) )
                @ Y2
                @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f141,f148,f148]) ).

thf(f204,plain,
    ( ec
    = ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
          ( ~ ( ^ [Y2: reg,Y3: reg] :
                  ( ?? @ reg
                  @ ^ [Y4: reg] :
                      ( ( ^ [Y5: reg,Y6: reg] :
                            ( !! @ reg
                            @ ^ [Y7: reg] :
                                ( ( c @ Y7 @ Y5 )
                               => ( c @ Y7 @ Y6 ) ) )
                        @ Y4
                        @ Y3 )
                      & ( ^ [Y5: reg,Y6: reg] :
                            ( !! @ reg
                            @ ^ [Y7: reg] :
                                ( ( c @ Y7 @ Y5 )
                               => ( c @ Y7 @ Y6 ) ) )
                        @ Y4
                        @ Y2 ) ) )
              @ Y0
              @ Y1 )
          & ( c @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f171,f202]) ).

thf(f208,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) )
      @ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                ( ( Y1 @ Y3 )
                | ~ ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 ) ) )
        @ fool
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ^ [Y1: reg,Y2: reg] :
                ( ~ ( ^ [Y3: reg,Y4: reg] :
                        ( ?? @ reg
                        @ ^ [Y5: reg] :
                            ( ( ^ [Y6: reg,Y7: reg] :
                                  ( !! @ reg
                                  @ ^ [Y8: reg] :
                                      ( ( c @ Y8 @ Y6 )
                                     => ( c @ Y8 @ Y7 ) ) )
                              @ Y5
                              @ Y4 )
                            & ( ^ [Y6: reg,Y7: reg] :
                                  ( !! @ reg
                                  @ ^ [Y8: reg] :
                                      ( ( c @ Y8 @ Y6 )
                                     => ( c @ Y8 @ Y7 ) ) )
                              @ Y5
                              @ Y3 ) ) )
                    @ Y1
                    @ Y2 )
                & ( c @ Y1 @ Y2 ) )
            @ spain
            @ france ) ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f154,f174,f181,f204]) ).

thf(f212,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) )
      @ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y3: $i] :
                ( ( Y1 @ Y3 )
                | ~ ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 ) ) )
        @ fool
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ reg
            @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                    ( ( ( ^ [Y3: reg,Y4: reg] :
                            ( !! @ reg
                            @ ^ [Y5: reg] :
                                ( ( c @ Y5 @ Y3 )
                               => ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 ) ) )
                        @ Y1
                        @ spain )
                      & ( ^ [Y3: reg,Y4: reg] :
                            ( !! @ reg
                            @ ^ [Y5: reg] :
                                ( ( c @ Y5 @ Y3 )
                               => ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 ) ) )
                        @ Y2
                        @ france ) )
                   => ~ ( ^ [Y3: reg,Y4: reg] :
                            ( ?? @ reg
                            @ ^ [Y5: reg] :
                                ( ( ^ [Y6: reg,Y7: reg] :
                                      ( !! @ reg
                                      @ ^ [Y8: reg] :
                                          ( ( c @ Y8 @ Y6 )
                                         => ( c @ Y8 @ Y7 ) ) )
                                  @ Y5
                                  @ Y4 )
                                & ( ^ [Y6: reg,Y7: reg] :
                                      ( !! @ reg
                                      @ ^ [Y8: reg] :
                                          ( ( c @ Y8 @ Y6 )
                                         => ( c @ Y8 @ Y7 ) ) )
                                  @ Y5
                                  @ Y3 ) ) )
                        @ Y1
                        @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f177,f174,f181,f148,f148,f202]) ).

thf(f295,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( ~ ( ?? @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                        ( ( !! @ reg
                          @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                              ( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
                             => ( c @ Y3 @ france ) ) )
                        & ( !! @ reg
                          @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                              ( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
                             => ( c @ Y3 @ spain ) ) ) ) )
                & ( c @ spain @ france ) )
              | ~ ( fool @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f208]) ).

thf(f296,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( !! @ $i
            @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
                ( ( ~ ( ?? @ reg
                      @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                          ( ( !! @ reg
                            @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                                ( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
                               => ( c @ Y3 @ france ) ) )
                          & ( !! @ reg
                            @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                                ( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
                               => ( c @ Y3 @ spain ) ) ) ) )
                  & ( c @ spain @ france ) )
                | ~ ( fool @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
        @ X1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f295]) ).

thf(f297,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( !! @ $i
        @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( ~ ( ?? @ reg
                  @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                      ( ( !! @ reg
                        @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                            ( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                           => ( c @ Y2 @ france ) ) )
                      & ( !! @ reg
                        @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                            ( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                           => ( c @ Y2 @ spain ) ) ) ) )
              & ( c @ spain @ france ) )
            | ~ ( fool @ X1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f296]) ).

thf(f298,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
            ( ( ~ ( ?? @ reg
                  @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                      ( ( !! @ reg
                        @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                            ( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                           => ( c @ Y2 @ france ) ) )
                      & ( !! @ reg
                        @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                            ( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                           => ( c @ Y2 @ spain ) ) ) ) )
              & ( c @ spain @ france ) )
            | ~ ( fool @ X1 @ Y0 ) )
        @ X2 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f297]) ).

thf(f299,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( $true
      = ( ( ~ ( ?? @ reg
              @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
                  ( ( !! @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                        ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                       => ( c @ Y1 @ france ) ) )
                  & ( !! @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                        ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                       => ( c @ Y1 @ spain ) ) ) ) )
          & ( c @ spain @ france ) )
        | ~ ( fool @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f298]) ).

thf(f300,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( ?? @ reg
              @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
                  ( ( !! @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                        ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                       => ( c @ Y1 @ france ) ) )
                  & ( !! @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                        ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                       => ( c @ Y1 @ spain ) ) ) ) )
          & ( c @ spain @ france ) )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( ~ ( fool @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f299]) ).

thf(f302,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( ~ ( ?? @ reg
              @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
                  ( ( !! @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                        ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                       => ( c @ Y1 @ france ) ) )
                  & ( !! @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                        ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                       => ( c @ Y1 @ spain ) ) ) ) ) ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( ~ ( fool @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f300]) ).

thf(f303,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ?? @ reg
          @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
              ( ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                    ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                   => ( c @ Y1 @ france ) ) )
              & ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                    ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                   => ( c @ Y1 @ spain ) ) ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( ~ ( fool @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f302]) ).

thf(f304,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: reg,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ^ [Y0: reg] :
              ( ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                    ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                   => ( c @ Y1 @ france ) ) )
              & ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                    ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                   => ( c @ Y1 @ spain ) ) ) )
          @ X3 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( ~ ( fool @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f303]) ).

thf(f305,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: reg,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ^ [Y0: reg] :
              ( ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                    ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                   => ( c @ Y1 @ france ) ) )
              & ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                    ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                   => ( c @ Y1 @ spain ) ) ) )
          @ X3 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( fool @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f304]) ).

thf(f306,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: reg,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( fool @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ( !! @ reg
            @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
                ( ( c @ Y0 @ X3 )
               => ( c @ Y0 @ france ) ) )
          & ( !! @ reg
            @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
                ( ( c @ Y0 @ X3 )
               => ( c @ Y0 @ spain ) ) ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f305]) ).

thf(f307,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: reg,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( fool @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( !! @ reg
          @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
              ( ( c @ Y0 @ X3 )
             => ( c @ Y0 @ spain ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( !! @ reg
          @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
              ( ( c @ Y0 @ X3 )
             => ( c @ Y0 @ france ) ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f306]) ).

thf(f308,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: reg,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( fool @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ^ [Y0: reg] :
              ( ( c @ Y0 @ X3 )
             => ( c @ Y0 @ spain ) )
          @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( !! @ reg
          @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
              ( ( c @ Y0 @ X3 )
             => ( c @ Y0 @ france ) ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f307]) ).

thf(f309,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: reg,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $false
        = ( ^ [Y0: reg] :
              ( ( c @ Y0 @ X3 )
             => ( c @ Y0 @ france ) )
          @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) ) )
      | ( ( fool @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ^ [Y0: reg] :
              ( ( c @ Y0 @ X3 )
             => ( c @ Y0 @ spain ) )
          @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f308]) ).

thf(f310,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: reg,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( fool @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ( c @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) @ X3 )
         => ( c @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) @ spain ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ X3 )
         => ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ france ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f309]) ).

thf(f311,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: reg,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( fool @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( c @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) @ spain )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ X3 )
         => ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ france ) )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f310]) ).

thf(f312,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: reg,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ X3 )
         => ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ france ) )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( c @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) @ X3 ) )
      | ( ( fool @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f310]) ).

thf(f313,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: reg,X1: $i] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( c @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) @ X3 ) )
      | ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ france )
        = $false )
      | ( ( fool @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f312]) ).

thf(f314,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: reg,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( fool @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ X3 )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( c @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f312]) ).

thf(f315,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: reg,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( c @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) @ spain )
        = $false )
      | ( ( fool @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ france )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f311]) ).

thf(f316,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X3: reg,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( c @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) @ spain )
        = $false )
      | ( ( fool @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ X3 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f311]) ).

thf(f372,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                    ( !! @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                        ( ( ( !! @ reg
                            @ ^ [Y4: reg] :
                                ( ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 )
                               => ( c @ Y4 @ spain ) ) )
                          & ( !! @ reg
                            @ ^ [Y4: reg] :
                                ( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
                               => ( c @ Y4 @ france ) ) ) )
                       => ~ ( ?? @ reg
                            @ ^ [Y4: reg] :
                                ( ( !! @ reg
                                  @ ^ [Y5: reg] :
                                      ( ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 )
                                     => ( c @ Y5 @ Y3 ) ) )
                                & ( !! @ reg
                                  @ ^ [Y5: reg] :
                                      ( ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 )
                                     => ( c @ Y5 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
              | ~ ( fool @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f212]) ).

thf(f373,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( !! @ $i
          @ ^ [Y1: $i] :
              ( ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                    ( !! @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                        ( ( ( !! @ reg
                            @ ^ [Y4: reg] :
                                ( ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 )
                               => ( c @ Y4 @ spain ) ) )
                          & ( !! @ reg
                            @ ^ [Y4: reg] :
                                ( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
                               => ( c @ Y4 @ france ) ) ) )
                       => ~ ( ?? @ reg
                            @ ^ [Y4: reg] :
                                ( ( !! @ reg
                                  @ ^ [Y5: reg] :
                                      ( ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 )
                                     => ( c @ Y5 @ Y3 ) ) )
                                & ( !! @ reg
                                  @ ^ [Y5: reg] :
                                      ( ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 )
                                     => ( c @ Y5 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
              | ~ ( fool @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
      @ sK12 )
    = $false ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f372]) ).

thf(f374,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( !! @ $i
      @ ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( !! @ reg
            @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                    ( ( ( !! @ reg
                        @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                            ( ( c @ Y3 @ Y1 )
                           => ( c @ Y3 @ spain ) ) )
                      & ( !! @ reg
                        @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                            ( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
                           => ( c @ Y3 @ france ) ) ) )
                   => ~ ( ?? @ reg
                        @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                            ( ( !! @ reg
                              @ ^ [Y4: reg] :
                                  ( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
                                 => ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 ) ) )
                            & ( !! @ reg
                              @ ^ [Y4: reg] :
                                  ( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
                                 => ( c @ Y4 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
          | ~ ( fool @ sK12 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f373]) ).

thf(f375,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
          ( ( !! @ reg
            @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                    ( ( ( !! @ reg
                        @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                            ( ( c @ Y3 @ Y1 )
                           => ( c @ Y3 @ spain ) ) )
                      & ( !! @ reg
                        @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                            ( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
                           => ( c @ Y3 @ france ) ) ) )
                   => ~ ( ?? @ reg
                        @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                            ( ( !! @ reg
                              @ ^ [Y4: reg] :
                                  ( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
                                 => ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 ) ) )
                            & ( !! @ reg
                              @ ^ [Y4: reg] :
                                  ( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
                                 => ( c @ Y4 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
          | ~ ( fool @ sK12 @ Y0 ) )
      @ sK13 )
    = $false ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f374]) ).

thf(f376,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( ( !! @ reg
        @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
            ( !! @ reg
            @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                ( ( ( !! @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                        ( ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 )
                       => ( c @ Y2 @ spain ) ) )
                  & ( !! @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                        ( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                       => ( c @ Y2 @ france ) ) ) )
               => ~ ( ?? @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                        ( ( !! @ reg
                          @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                              ( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
                             => ( c @ Y3 @ Y1 ) ) )
                        & ( !! @ reg
                          @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                              ( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
                             => ( c @ Y3 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( fool @ sK12 @ sK13 ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f375]) ).

thf(f377,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( fool @ sK12 @ sK13 ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f376]) ).

thf(f378,plain,
    ( ( !! @ reg
      @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
          ( !! @ reg
          @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
              ( ( ( !! @ reg
                  @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                      ( ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 )
                     => ( c @ Y2 @ spain ) ) )
                & ( !! @ reg
                  @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                      ( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                     => ( c @ Y2 @ france ) ) ) )
             => ~ ( ?? @ reg
                  @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                      ( ( !! @ reg
                        @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                            ( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
                           => ( c @ Y3 @ Y1 ) ) )
                      & ( !! @ reg
                        @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                            ( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
                           => ( c @ Y3 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f376]) ).

thf(f379,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: reg] :
          ( !! @ reg
          @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
              ( ( ( !! @ reg
                  @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                      ( ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 )
                     => ( c @ Y2 @ spain ) ) )
                & ( !! @ reg
                  @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                      ( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                     => ( c @ Y2 @ france ) ) ) )
             => ~ ( ?? @ reg
                  @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                      ( ( !! @ reg
                        @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                            ( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
                           => ( c @ Y3 @ Y1 ) ) )
                      & ( !! @ reg
                        @ ^ [Y3: reg] :
                            ( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
                           => ( c @ Y3 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
      @ sK14 )
    = $false ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f378]) ).

thf(f380,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( !! @ reg
      @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
          ( ( ( !! @ reg
              @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                  ( ( c @ Y1 @ sK14 )
                 => ( c @ Y1 @ spain ) ) )
            & ( !! @ reg
              @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                  ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                 => ( c @ Y1 @ france ) ) ) )
         => ~ ( ?? @ reg
              @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                  ( ( !! @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                        ( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                       => ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 ) ) )
                  & ( !! @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                        ( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                       => ( c @ Y2 @ sK14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f379]) ).

thf(f381,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: reg] :
          ( ( ( !! @ reg
              @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                  ( ( c @ Y1 @ sK14 )
                 => ( c @ Y1 @ spain ) ) )
            & ( !! @ reg
              @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                  ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                 => ( c @ Y1 @ france ) ) ) )
         => ~ ( ?? @ reg
              @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                  ( ( !! @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                        ( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                       => ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 ) ) )
                  & ( !! @ reg
                    @ ^ [Y2: reg] :
                        ( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
                       => ( c @ Y2 @ sK14 ) ) ) ) ) )
      @ sK15 )
    = $false ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f380]) ).

thf(f382,plain,
    ( ( ( ( !! @ reg
          @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
              ( ( c @ Y0 @ sK14 )
             => ( c @ Y0 @ spain ) ) )
        & ( !! @ reg
          @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
              ( ( c @ Y0 @ sK15 )
             => ( c @ Y0 @ france ) ) ) )
     => ~ ( ?? @ reg
          @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
              ( ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                    ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                   => ( c @ Y1 @ sK15 ) ) )
              & ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                    ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                   => ( c @ Y1 @ sK14 ) ) ) ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f381]) ).

thf(f383,plain,
    ( $false
    = ( ~ ( ?? @ reg
          @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
              ( ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                    ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                   => ( c @ Y1 @ sK15 ) ) )
              & ( !! @ reg
                @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                    ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
                   => ( c @ Y1 @ sK14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f382]) ).

thf(f384,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ( !! @ reg
        @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
            ( ( c @ Y0 @ sK14 )
           => ( c @ Y0 @ spain ) ) )
      & ( !! @ reg
        @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
            ( ( c @ Y0 @ sK15 )
           => ( c @ Y0 @ france ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f382]) ).

thf(f385,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( !! @ reg
      @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
          ( ( c @ Y0 @ sK15 )
         => ( c @ Y0 @ france ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f384]) ).

thf(f386,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( !! @ reg
      @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
          ( ( c @ Y0 @ sK14 )
         => ( c @ Y0 @ spain ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f384]) ).

thf(f387,plain,
    ! [X1: reg] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: reg] :
            ( ( c @ Y0 @ sK14 )
           => ( c @ Y0 @ spain ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f386]) ).

thf(f388,plain,
    ! [X1: reg] :
      ( $true
      = ( ( c @ X1 @ sK14 )
       => ( c @ X1 @ spain ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f387]) ).

thf(f389,plain,
    ! [X1: reg] :
      ( ( ( c @ X1 @ sK14 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( c @ X1 @ spain ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f388]) ).

thf(f390,plain,
    ! [X1: reg] :
      ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: reg] :
            ( ( c @ Y0 @ sK15 )
           => ( c @ Y0 @ france ) )
        @ X1 ) ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f385]) ).

thf(f391,plain,
    ! [X1: reg] :
      ( ( ( c @ X1 @ sK15 )
       => ( c @ X1 @ france ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f390]) ).

thf(f392,plain,
    ! [X1: reg] :
      ( ( ( c @ X1 @ sK15 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( c @ X1 @ france ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f391]) ).

thf(f393,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ?? @ reg
      @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
          ( ( !! @ reg
            @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
               => ( c @ Y1 @ sK15 ) ) )
          & ( !! @ reg
            @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
               => ( c @ Y1 @ sK14 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f383]) ).

thf(f394,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: reg] :
          ( ( !! @ reg
            @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
               => ( c @ Y1 @ sK15 ) ) )
          & ( !! @ reg
            @ ^ [Y1: reg] :
                ( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
               => ( c @ Y1 @ sK14 ) ) ) )
      @ sK16 )
    = $true ),
    inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f393]) ).

thf(f395,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( ( !! @ reg
        @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
            ( ( c @ Y0 @ sK16 )
           => ( c @ Y0 @ sK15 ) ) )
      & ( !! @ reg
        @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
            ( ( c @ Y0 @ sK16 )
           => ( c @ Y0 @ sK14 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f394]) ).

thf(f396,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( !! @ reg
      @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
          ( ( c @ Y0 @ sK16 )
         => ( c @ Y0 @ sK14 ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f395]) ).

thf(f397,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( !! @ reg
      @ ^ [Y0: reg] :
          ( ( c @ Y0 @ sK16 )
         => ( c @ Y0 @ sK15 ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f395]) ).

thf(f398,plain,
    ! [X1: reg] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: reg] :
            ( ( c @ Y0 @ sK16 )
           => ( c @ Y0 @ sK15 ) )
        @ X1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f397]) ).

thf(f399,plain,
    ! [X1: reg] :
      ( $true
      = ( ( c @ X1 @ sK16 )
       => ( c @ X1 @ sK15 ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f398]) ).

thf(f400,plain,
    ! [X1: reg] :
      ( ( ( c @ X1 @ sK16 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( c @ X1 @ sK15 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f399]) ).

thf(f401,plain,
    ! [X1: reg] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: reg] :
            ( ( c @ Y0 @ sK16 )
           => ( c @ Y0 @ sK14 ) )
        @ X1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f396]) ).

thf(f402,plain,
    ! [X1: reg] :
      ( $true
      = ( ( c @ X1 @ sK16 )
       => ( c @ X1 @ sK14 ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f401]) ).

thf(f403,plain,
    ! [X1: reg] :
      ( ( ( c @ X1 @ sK16 )
        = $false )
      | ( $true
        = ( c @ X1 @ sK14 ) ) ),
    inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f402]) ).

thf(f404,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( fool @ sK12 @ sK13 ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f377]) ).

thf(f466,definition,
    ( spl19_9
  <=> ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( fool @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl19_9])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f467,plain,
    ( ! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( fool @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $false )
    | ~ spl19_9 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f466]) ).

thf(f469,definition,
    ( spl19_10
  <=> ! [X3: reg] :
        ( ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ X3 )
          = $true )
        | ( $true
          = ( c @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl19_10])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f470,plain,
    ( ! [X3: reg] :
        ( ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ X3 )
          = $true )
        | ( $true
          = ( c @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) @ X3 ) ) )
    | ~ spl19_10 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f469]) ).

thf(f471,plain,
    ( spl19_9
    | spl19_10 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f314,f469,f466]) ).

thf(f473,definition,
    ( spl19_11
  <=> ! [X3: reg] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( c @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) @ X3 ) )
        | ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ france )
          = $false ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl19_11])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f474,plain,
    ( ! [X3: reg] :
        ( ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ france )
          = $false )
        | ( $true
          = ( c @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) @ X3 ) ) )
    | ~ spl19_11 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f473]) ).

thf(f475,plain,
    ( spl19_9
    | spl19_11 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f313,f473,f466]) ).

thf(f477,definition,
    ( spl19_12
  <=> ! [X3: reg] :
        ( ( ( c @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) @ spain )
          = $false )
        | ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ X3 )
          = $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl19_12])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f478,plain,
    ( ! [X3: reg] :
        ( ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ X3 )
          = $true )
        | ( ( c @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) @ spain )
          = $false ) )
    | ~ spl19_12 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f477]) ).

thf(f479,plain,
    ( spl19_9
    | spl19_12 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f316,f477,f466]) ).

thf(f481,definition,
    ( spl19_13
  <=> ! [X3: reg] :
        ( ( ( c @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) @ spain )
          = $false )
        | ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ france )
          = $false ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl19_13])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f482,plain,
    ( ! [X3: reg] :
        ( ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ X3 ) @ france )
          = $false )
        | ( ( c @ ( sK4 @ X3 ) @ spain )
          = $false ) )
    | ~ spl19_13 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f481]) ).

thf(f483,plain,
    ( spl19_9
    | spl19_13 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f315,f481,f466]) ).

thf(f569,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl19_9 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f467,f404]) ).

thf(f573,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl19_9 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f569]) ).

thf(f574,plain,
    ~ spl19_9,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f573]) ).

thf(f750,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK4 @ sK16 ) @ sK16 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK5 @ sK16 ) @ sK15 ) )
    | ~ spl19_10 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f400,f470]) ).

thf(f759,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK5 @ sK16 ) @ sK15 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK4 @ sK16 ) @ sK16 ) )
    | ~ spl19_10 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f750]) ).

thf(f765,definition,
    ( spl19_28
  <=> ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK5 @ sK16 ) @ sK15 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl19_28])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f767,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK5 @ sK16 ) @ sK15 ) )
    | ~ spl19_28 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f765]) ).

thf(f769,definition,
    ( spl19_29
  <=> ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK4 @ sK16 ) @ sK16 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl19_29])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f771,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK4 @ sK16 ) @ sK16 ) )
    | ~ spl19_29 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f769]) ).

thf(f816,plain,
    ( spl19_29
    | spl19_28
    | ~ spl19_10 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f759,f469,f765,f769]) ).

thf(f823,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK4 @ sK16 ) @ sK14 ) )
    | ~ spl19_29 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f403,f771]) ).

thf(f825,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK4 @ sK16 ) @ sK14 ) )
    | ~ spl19_29 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f823]) ).

thf(f838,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK4 @ sK16 ) @ spain ) )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl19_29 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f825,f389]) ).

thf(f841,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK4 @ sK16 ) @ spain ) )
    | ~ spl19_29 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f838]) ).

thf(f939,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( c @ ( sK4 @ sK16 ) @ spain ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK5 @ sK16 ) @ sK15 ) )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl19_12 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f400,f478]) ).

thf(f950,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( c @ ( sK4 @ sK16 ) @ spain ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK5 @ sK16 ) @ sK15 ) )
    | ~ spl19_12 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f939]) ).

thf(f967,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK5 @ sK16 ) @ sK15 ) )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl19_12
    | ~ spl19_29 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f950,f841]) ).

thf(f968,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK5 @ sK16 ) @ sK15 ) )
    | ~ spl19_12
    | ~ spl19_29 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f967]) ).

thf(f980,plain,
    ( spl19_28
    | ~ spl19_12
    | ~ spl19_29 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f968,f769,f477,f765]) ).

thf(f990,plain,
    ( ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ sK16 ) @ france )
      = $true )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl19_28 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f392,f767]) ).

thf(f991,plain,
    ( ( ( c @ ( sK5 @ sK16 ) @ france )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl19_28 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f990]) ).

thf(f1035,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK4 @ sK16 ) @ sK16 ) )
    | ~ spl19_11
    | ~ spl19_28 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f474,f991]) ).

thf(f1037,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( c @ ( sK4 @ sK16 ) @ sK16 ) )
    | ~ spl19_11
    | ~ spl19_28 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f1035]) ).

thf(f1039,plain,
    ( spl19_29
    | ~ spl19_11
    | ~ spl19_28 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f1037,f765,f473,f769]) ).

thf(f1100,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( c @ ( sK4 @ sK16 ) @ spain ) )
    | ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl19_13
    | ~ spl19_28 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f482,f991]) ).

thf(f1113,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( c @ ( sK4 @ sK16 ) @ spain ) )
    | ~ spl19_13
    | ~ spl19_28 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f1100]) ).

thf(f1119,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl19_13
    | ~ spl19_28
    | ~ spl19_29 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f1113,f841]) ).

thf(f1120,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl19_13
    | ~ spl19_28
    | ~ spl19_29 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f1119]) ).

thf(f1121,plain,
    ( ~ spl19_13
    | ~ spl19_28
    | ~ spl19_29 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f1120]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    ( spl19_9
    | spl19_10 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f471]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    ( spl19_9
    | spl19_11 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f475]) ).

cnf(s10,plain,
    ( spl19_9
    | spl19_12 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f479]) ).

cnf(s11,plain,
    ( spl19_9
    | spl19_13 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f483]) ).

cnf(s27,plain,
    ~ spl19_9,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f574]) ).

cnf(s36,plain,
    ( ~ spl19_10
    | spl19_28
    | spl19_29 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f816]) ).

cnf(s47,plain,
    ( ~ spl19_12
    | spl19_28
    | ~ spl19_29 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f980]) ).

cnf(s54,plain,
    ( ~ spl19_11
    | ~ spl19_28
    | spl19_29 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f1039]) ).

cnf(s57,plain,
    ( ~ spl19_13
    | ~ spl19_28
    | ~ spl19_29 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f1121]) ).

cnf(s59,plain,
    spl19_13,
    inference(rat,[],[s11,s27]) ).

cnf(s60,plain,
    spl19_12,
    inference(rat,[],[s10,s27]) ).

cnf(s61,plain,
    spl19_11,
    inference(rat,[],[s9,s27]) ).

cnf(s62,plain,
    spl19_10,
    inference(rat,[],[s8,s27]) ).

cnf(s63,plain,
    spl19_28,
    inference(rat,[],[s36,s47,s62,s60]) ).

cnf(s64,plain,
    ~ spl19_29,
    inference(rat,[],[s57,s59,s63]) ).

cnf(s65,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s54,s61,s64,s63]) ).

thf(f1122,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s65]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEG016^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.17  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 18:34:15 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.17  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.21  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.22  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042866)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042875)dis+21_4_fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=off:foolp=on:random_seed=84148504:i=24:av=off:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042873)lrs+10_1_cnfonf=off:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=1839890735:i=3:rtra=on:inj=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042871)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=2376658270:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042872)lrs+10_16_si=on:nwc=1.5:random_seed=2784103846:i=18:kws=arity_squared:rtra=on:fe=abstraction:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042874)dis+1002_4:1_sfv=off:to=lpo:plsq=on:fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:spb=non_intro:acc=on:uwa=off:fd=preordered:foolp=on:s2agt=32:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=937496214:hsq=on:hsqr=16,1:s2a=on:i=634:add=on:nm=16:nicw=on:rtra=on:gtg=position:ss=included:ixr=off:c=on:inj=on:ntd=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/634Mi)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042875)Instruction limit reached! 
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042875)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042875)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042875)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042875)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042875)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042875)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042875)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042875)Peak memory usage: 11 MB
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042875)Instructions burned: 27 (million)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042873)Instruction limit reached! 
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042873)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042873)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042873)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042873)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042873)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042873)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042873)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042873)Peak memory usage: 10 MB
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042873)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042877)WARNING Broken Constraint: if ho_split_queue_ratios(1,8) has been set then ho_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042877)WARNING Broken Constraint: if sine_to_age_tolerance(5) has been set then sine_to_age(off) is equal to on or sine_to_pred_levels(off) is not equal to off or sine_level_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042872)Instruction limit reached! 
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042872)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042872)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042872)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042872)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042872)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042872)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042872)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042872)Peak memory usage: 11 MB
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042872)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042877)dis+1002_8_to=kbo:sil=128000:tgt=full:drc=off:si=on:sp=const_max:lma=off:spb=non_intro:cbe=off:uwa=interpreted_only:random_seed=261178235:hsqr=1,8:i=157:s2at=5:add=on:nm=2:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/157Mi)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042876)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sil=128000:e2e=on:si=on:random_seed=3725374102:s2a=on:i=75:s2at=3:aac=none:bd=preordered:rtra=on:fe=abstraction_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042883)dis+10_1024_sil=128000:si=on:sp=unary_first:urr=on:uwa=all:fd=off:random_seed=2350226266:i=2:hud=10:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042883)Instruction limit reached! 
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042883)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042883)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042883)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042883)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042883)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042883)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042883)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042883)Peak memory usage: 10 MB
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042883)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042884)lrs+1010_2:3_cha=on:si=on:uwa=off:nwc=1:random_seed=2925562293:i=5:fgj=on:av=off:rtra=on:fe=axiom:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/5Mi)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042885)WARNING Broken Constraint: if forward_subsumption_demodulation_max_matches(5) has been set then forward_subsumption_demodulation(off) is equal to on
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042889)lrs+10_1_sil=128000:si=on:urr=on:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=4097812674:i=12:s2at=2:kws=inv_frequency:bd=all:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/12Mi)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042884)Instruction limit reached! 
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042884)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042884)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042884)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042884)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042884)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042884)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042884)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042884)Peak memory usage: 10 MB
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042884)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042885)dis+21_1_to=kbo:sil=128000:plsq=on:plsqc=1:cnfonf=lazy_gen:si=on:plsqr=64,1:uwa=hol:random_seed=2586128414:uwa_fpi=on:i=7:fgj=on:hud=10:fsr=off:rtra=on:rawr=on:fsdmm=5_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042889)Instruction limit reached! 
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042889)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042889)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042889)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042889)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042889)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042889)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042889)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042889)Peak memory usage: 11 MB
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042889)Instructions burned: 15 (million)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042871) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-3042866-3042871"...
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042885)Instruction limit reached! 
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042885)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042885)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042885)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042885)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042885)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042885)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042885)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042885)Peak memory usage: 10 MB
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042885)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042871)...printing done.
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042871)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.30  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042871)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042871)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042871)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042871)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042871)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042871)Time elapsed: 0.037 s
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042871)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042871)Instructions burned: 71 (million)
% 0.20/0.30  % (3042866)Success in time 0.075 s
% 0.20/0.30  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------