%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem : GEG018^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:49:27 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.28s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 26
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 59 ( 56 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 570 ( 55 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 9 avg)
% Number of connectives : 1464 ( 98 ~; 10 |; 116 &; 977 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 94 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 4 ( 2 usr)
% Number of type conns : 20 ( 20 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 86 ( 81 usr; 14 con; 0-4 aty)
% ( 113 !!; 56 ??; 0 @@+; 0 @@-)
% Number of variables : 334 ( 309 ^; 18 !; 7 ?; 334 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
mu: $tType ).
thf(type_def_6,type,
sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).
thf(type_def_7,type,
reg: $tType ).
thf(func_def_0,type,
meq_ind: mu > mu > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_1,type,
meq_prop: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_3,type,
mnot: ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_4,type,
mor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_5,type,
mand: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_6,type,
mimplies: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_7,type,
mimplied: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_8,type,
mequiv: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_9,type,
mxor: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_10,type,
mforall_ind: ( mu > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_11,type,
mforall_prop: ( ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_12,type,
mexists_ind: ( mu > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_13,type,
mexists_prop: ( ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_14,type,
mtrue: $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_15,type,
mfalse: $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_16,type,
mbox: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_17,type,
mdia: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_18,type,
mreflexive: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_19,type,
msymmetric: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_20,type,
mserial: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_21,type,
mtransitive: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_22,type,
meuclidean: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_23,type,
mpartially_functional: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_24,type,
mfunctional: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_25,type,
mweakly_dense: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_26,type,
mweakly_connected: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_27,type,
mweakly_directed: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_28,type,
mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_29,type,
minvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_30,type,
msatisfiable: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_31,type,
mcountersatisfiable: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_32,type,
c: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(func_def_33,type,
dc: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(func_def_34,type,
p: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(func_def_35,type,
eq: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(func_def_36,type,
o: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(func_def_37,type,
po: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(func_def_38,type,
ec: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(func_def_39,type,
pp: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(func_def_40,type,
tpp: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(func_def_41,type,
ntpp: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(func_def_42,type,
catalunya: reg ).
thf(func_def_43,type,
france: reg ).
thf(func_def_44,type,
spain: reg ).
thf(func_def_45,type,
paris: reg ).
thf(func_def_46,type,
a: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_47,type,
fool: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(func_def_48,type,
vPI:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).
thf(func_def_49,type,
vOR: $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_50,type,
vNOT: $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_51,type,
db3:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_52,type,
db1:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_53,type,
db0:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_54,type,
db2:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_55,type,
vLAM:
!>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).
thf(func_def_58,type,
vSIGMA:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).
thf(func_def_59,type,
vAND: $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_60,type,
vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).
thf(func_def_61,type,
db4:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(func_def_62,type,
vEQ:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( X0 > X0 > $o ) ).
thf(func_def_63,type,
sK0: reg > reg ).
thf(func_def_64,type,
sK1: reg > reg ).
thf(func_def_65,type,
sK2: reg ).
thf(func_def_66,type,
sK3: reg > reg ).
thf(func_def_67,type,
sK4: reg > reg ).
thf(func_def_68,type,
sK5: reg > reg ).
thf(func_def_69,type,
sK6: reg > reg ).
thf(func_def_70,type,
sK7: reg ).
thf(func_def_71,type,
sK8: reg > reg ).
thf(func_def_72,type,
sK9: reg > reg ).
thf(func_def_73,type,
sK10: reg ).
thf(func_def_76,type,
sK13: reg ).
thf(func_def_77,type,
sK14: reg > reg ).
thf(func_def_78,type,
sK15: reg > reg > reg ).
thf(func_def_79,type,
sK16: reg > reg ).
thf(func_def_80,type,
sK17: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).
thf(func_def_81,type,
sK18: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).
thf(func_def_82,type,
sK19: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i ).
thf(f16,axiom,
( mbox
= ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
! [X3: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X3 )
| ~ ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mbox) ).
thf(f28,axiom,
( ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
! [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) )
= mvalid ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL013^0.ax',mvalid) ).
thf(f35,axiom,
( ( ^ [X0: reg,X1: reg] :
! [X2: reg] :
( ( c @ X2 @ X0 )
=> ( c @ X2 @ X1 ) ) )
= p ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL014^0.ax',p) ).
thf(f37,axiom,
( o
= ( ^ [X0: reg,X1: reg] :
? [X2: reg] :
( ( p @ X2 @ X0 )
& ( p @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL014^0.ax',o) ).
thf(f39,axiom,
( ( ^ [X0: reg,X1: reg] :
( ~ ( o @ X0 @ X1 )
& ( c @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )
= ec ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL014^0.ax',ec) ).
thf(f40,axiom,
( ( ^ [X0: reg,X1: reg] :
( ( p @ X0 @ X1 )
& ~ ( p @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
= pp ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL014^0.ax',pp) ).
thf(f42,axiom,
( ( ^ [X0: reg,X1: reg] :
( ( pp @ X0 @ X1 )
& ~ ? [X2: reg] :
( ( ec @ X2 @ X1 )
& ( ec @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ) )
= ntpp ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL014^0.ax',ntpp) ).
thf(f49,conjecture,
( mvalid
@ ( mbox @ fool
@ ^ [X0: $i] :
~ ? [X1: reg] :
! [X2: reg] : ( ntpp @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
thf(f50,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mvalid
@ ( mbox @ fool
@ ^ [X0: $i] :
~ ? [X1: reg] :
! [X2: reg] : ( ntpp @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f49]) ).
thf(f51,plain,
( mbox
= ( ^ [X0: $i > $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X2: $i] :
! [X3: $i] :
( ( X1 @ X3 )
| ~ ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f16]) ).
thf(f52,plain,
( mbox
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y3: $i] :
( ~ ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 )
| ( Y1 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f51]) ).
thf(f88,plain,
( ( ^ [X0: $i > $o] :
! [X1: $i] : ( X0 @ X1 ) )
= mvalid ),
inference(rectify,[],[f28]) ).
thf(f89,plain,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f88]) ).
thf(f99,plain,
~ ( mvalid
@ ( mbox @ fool
@ ^ [X0: $i] :
~ ? [X1: reg] :
! [X2: reg] : ( ntpp @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f50]) ).
thf(f100,plain,
( $true
!= ( mvalid
@ ( mbox @ fool
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] : ( ntpp @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f99]) ).
thf(f102,plain,
( ( ^ [X0: reg,X1: reg] :
! [X2: reg] :
( ( c @ X2 @ X0 )
=> ( c @ X2 @ X1 ) ) )
= p ),
inference(rectify,[],[f35]) ).
thf(f103,plain,
( p
= ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 )
=> ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f102]) ).
thf(f107,plain,
( ( ^ [X0: reg,X1: reg] :
( ( p @ X0 @ X1 )
& ~ ( p @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
= pp ),
inference(rectify,[],[f40]) ).
thf(f108,plain,
( pp
= ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
( ~ ( p @ Y1 @ Y0 )
& ( p @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f107]) ).
thf(f109,plain,
( ( ^ [X0: reg,X1: reg] :
( ~ ( o @ X0 @ X1 )
& ( c @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )
= ec ),
inference(rectify,[],[f39]) ).
thf(f110,plain,
( ec
= ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
( ( c @ Y0 @ Y1 )
& ~ ( o @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f109]) ).
thf(f116,plain,
( ( ^ [X0: reg,X1: reg] :
( ( pp @ X0 @ X1 )
& ~ ? [X2: reg] :
( ( ec @ X2 @ X1 )
& ( ec @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ) )
= ntpp ),
inference(rectify,[],[f42]) ).
thf(f117,plain,
( ntpp
= ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
( ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( ec @ Y2 @ Y0 )
& ( ec @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
& ( pp @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f116]) ).
thf(f126,plain,
( o
= ( ^ [X0: reg,X1: reg] :
? [X2: reg] :
( ( p @ X2 @ X0 )
& ( p @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f37]) ).
thf(f127,plain,
( o
= ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( p @ Y2 @ Y1 )
& ( p @ Y2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fool_elimination,[],[f126]) ).
thf(f138,plain,
( $true
!= ( mvalid
@ ( mbox @ fool
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] : ( ntpp @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f100]) ).
thf(f146,plain,
( pp
= ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
( ~ ( p @ Y1 @ Y0 )
& ( p @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f108]) ).
thf(f151,plain,
( p
= ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 )
=> ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f103]) ).
thf(f153,plain,
( o
= ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( p @ Y2 @ Y1 )
& ( p @ Y2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f127]) ).
thf(f172,plain,
( $true
!= ( mvalid
@ ( mbox @ fool
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] : ( ntpp @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f138]) ).
thf(f173,plain,
( ec
= ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
( ( c @ Y0 @ Y1 )
& ~ ( o @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f110]) ).
thf(f174,plain,
( ntpp
= ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
( ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( ec @ Y2 @ Y0 )
& ( ec @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
& ( pp @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).
thf(f179,plain,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f89]) ).
thf(f180,plain,
( mbox
= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y3: $i] :
( ~ ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 )
| ( Y1 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).
thf(f201,plain,
( o
= ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( ^ [Y3: reg,Y4: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y5: reg] :
( ( c @ Y5 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 ) ) )
@ Y2
@ Y1 )
& ( ^ [Y3: reg,Y4: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y5: reg] :
( ( c @ Y5 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 ) ) )
@ Y2
@ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f153,f151,f151]) ).
thf(f203,plain,
( ec
= ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
( ( c @ Y0 @ Y1 )
& ~ ( ^ [Y2: reg,Y3: reg] :
( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( ^ [Y5: reg,Y6: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y7: reg] :
( ( c @ Y7 @ Y5 )
=> ( c @ Y7 @ Y6 ) ) )
@ Y4
@ Y3 )
& ( ^ [Y5: reg,Y6: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y7: reg] :
( ( c @ Y7 @ Y5 )
=> ( c @ Y7 @ Y6 ) ) )
@ Y4
@ Y2 ) ) )
@ Y0
@ Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f173,f201]) ).
thf(f204,plain,
( pp
= ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
( ~ ( ^ [Y2: reg,Y3: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 ) ) )
@ Y1
@ Y0 )
& ( ^ [Y2: reg,Y3: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 ) ) )
@ Y0
@ Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f146,f151,f151]) ).
thf(f206,plain,
( ntpp
= ( ^ [Y0: reg,Y1: reg] :
( ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( ^ [Y3: reg,Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y3 @ Y4 )
& ~ ( ^ [Y5: reg,Y6: reg] :
( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y7: reg] :
( ( ^ [Y8: reg,Y9: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y10: reg] :
( ( c @ Y10 @ Y8 )
=> ( c @ Y10 @ Y9 ) ) )
@ Y7
@ Y6 )
& ( ^ [Y8: reg,Y9: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y10: reg] :
( ( c @ Y10 @ Y8 )
=> ( c @ Y10 @ Y9 ) ) )
@ Y7
@ Y5 ) ) )
@ Y3
@ Y4 ) )
@ Y2
@ Y0 )
& ( ^ [Y3: reg,Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y3 @ Y4 )
& ~ ( ^ [Y5: reg,Y6: reg] :
( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y7: reg] :
( ( ^ [Y8: reg,Y9: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y10: reg] :
( ( c @ Y10 @ Y8 )
=> ( c @ Y10 @ Y9 ) ) )
@ Y7
@ Y6 )
& ( ^ [Y8: reg,Y9: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y10: reg] :
( ( c @ Y10 @ Y8 )
=> ( c @ Y10 @ Y9 ) ) )
@ Y7
@ Y5 ) ) )
@ Y3
@ Y4 ) )
@ Y2
@ Y1 ) ) )
& ( ^ [Y2: reg,Y3: reg] :
( ~ ( ^ [Y4: reg,Y5: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y6: reg] :
( ( c @ Y6 @ Y4 )
=> ( c @ Y6 @ Y5 ) ) )
@ Y3
@ Y2 )
& ( ^ [Y4: reg,Y5: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y6: reg] :
( ( c @ Y6 @ Y4 )
=> ( c @ Y6 @ Y5 ) ) )
@ Y2
@ Y3 ) )
@ Y0
@ Y1 ) ) ) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f174,f203,f203,f204]) ).
thf(f211,plain,
( $true
!= ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] : ( Y0 @ Y1 ) )
@ ( ^ [Y0: $i > $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o,Y2: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y3: $i] :
( ~ ( Y0 @ Y2 @ Y3 )
| ( Y1 @ Y3 ) ) )
@ fool
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ^ [Y3: reg,Y4: reg] :
( ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y5: reg] :
( ( ^ [Y6: reg,Y7: reg] :
( ( c @ Y6 @ Y7 )
& ~ ( ^ [Y8: reg,Y9: reg] :
( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y10: reg] :
( ( ^ [Y11: reg,Y12: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y13: reg] :
( ( c @ Y13 @ Y11 )
=> ( c @ Y13 @ Y12 ) ) )
@ Y10
@ Y9 )
& ( ^ [Y11: reg,Y12: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y13: reg] :
( ( c @ Y13 @ Y11 )
=> ( c @ Y13 @ Y12 ) ) )
@ Y10
@ Y8 ) ) )
@ Y6
@ Y7 ) )
@ Y5
@ Y3 )
& ( ^ [Y6: reg,Y7: reg] :
( ( c @ Y6 @ Y7 )
& ~ ( ^ [Y8: reg,Y9: reg] :
( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y10: reg] :
( ( ^ [Y11: reg,Y12: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y13: reg] :
( ( c @ Y13 @ Y11 )
=> ( c @ Y13 @ Y12 ) ) )
@ Y10
@ Y9 )
& ( ^ [Y11: reg,Y12: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y13: reg] :
( ( c @ Y13 @ Y11 )
=> ( c @ Y13 @ Y12 ) ) )
@ Y10
@ Y8 ) ) )
@ Y6
@ Y7 ) )
@ Y5
@ Y4 ) ) )
& ( ^ [Y5: reg,Y6: reg] :
( ~ ( ^ [Y7: reg,Y8: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y9: reg] :
( ( c @ Y9 @ Y7 )
=> ( c @ Y9 @ Y8 ) ) )
@ Y6
@ Y5 )
& ( ^ [Y7: reg,Y8: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y9: reg] :
( ( c @ Y9 @ Y7 )
=> ( c @ Y9 @ Y8 ) ) )
@ Y5
@ Y6 ) )
@ Y3
@ Y4 ) )
@ Y1
@ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f172,f179,f180,f206]) ).
thf(f344,plain,
( $true
!= ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ~ ( fool @ Y0 @ Y1 )
| ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y5: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y6: reg] :
( ( c @ Y6 @ Y5 )
=> ( c @ Y6 @ Y2 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y6: reg] :
( ( c @ Y6 @ Y5 )
=> ( c @ Y6 @ Y4 ) ) ) ) )
& ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y5: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y6: reg] :
( ( c @ Y6 @ Y5 )
=> ( c @ Y6 @ Y3 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y6: reg] :
( ( c @ Y6 @ Y5 )
=> ( c @ Y6 @ Y4 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
& ~ ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f211]) ).
thf(f345,plain,
( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y1: $i] :
( ~ ( fool @ Y0 @ Y1 )
| ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y5: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y6: reg] :
( ( c @ Y6 @ Y5 )
=> ( c @ Y6 @ Y2 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y6: reg] :
( ( c @ Y6 @ Y5 )
=> ( c @ Y6 @ Y4 ) ) ) ) )
& ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y5: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y6: reg] :
( ( c @ Y6 @ Y5 )
=> ( c @ Y6 @ Y3 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y6: reg] :
( ( c @ Y6 @ Y5 )
=> ( c @ Y6 @ Y4 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
& ~ ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
@ sK11 )
= $false ),
inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f344]) ).
thf(f346,plain,
( ( !! @ $i
@ ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ~ ( fool @ sK11 @ Y0 )
| ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( c @ Y3 @ Y1 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y5: reg] :
( ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 )
=> ( c @ Y5 @ Y1 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y5: reg] :
( ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 )
=> ( c @ Y5 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) )
& ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y5: reg] :
( ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 )
=> ( c @ Y5 @ Y2 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y5: reg] :
( ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 )
=> ( c @ Y5 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
& ~ ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
=> ( c @ Y3 @ Y1 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( c @ Y3 @ Y1 )
=> ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f345]) ).
thf(f347,plain,
( ( ^ [Y0: $i] :
( ~ ( fool @ sK11 @ Y0 )
| ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( c @ Y3 @ Y1 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y5: reg] :
( ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 )
=> ( c @ Y5 @ Y1 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y5: reg] :
( ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 )
=> ( c @ Y5 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) )
& ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y5: reg] :
( ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 )
=> ( c @ Y5 @ Y2 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y5: reg] :
( ( c @ Y5 @ Y4 )
=> ( c @ Y5 @ Y3 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
& ~ ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
=> ( c @ Y3 @ Y1 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( c @ Y3 @ Y1 )
=> ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
@ sK12 )
= $false ),
inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f346]) ).
thf(f348,plain,
( ( ~ ( fool @ sK11 @ sK12 )
| ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y0: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y0 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) )
& ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y1 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
& ~ ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
=> ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 )
=> ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f347]) ).
thf(f349,plain,
( $false
= ( ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y0: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y0 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) )
& ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y1 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
& ~ ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
=> ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 )
=> ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f348]) ).
thf(f352,plain,
( $true
= ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y0: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y0 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) )
& ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y1 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
& ~ ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
=> ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 )
=> ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f349]) ).
thf(f353,plain,
( $true
= ( ^ [Y0: reg] :
( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y0 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) )
& ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y1 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y4: reg] :
( ( c @ Y4 @ Y3 )
=> ( c @ Y4 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
& ~ ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
=> ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 )
=> ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
@ sK13 ) ),
inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f352]) ).
thf(f354,plain,
( $true
= ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y0: reg] :
( ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( ( c @ Y1 @ sK13 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
=> ( c @ Y3 @ sK13 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
=> ( c @ Y3 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
& ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
=> ( c @ Y3 @ Y0 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
=> ( c @ Y3 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
& ~ ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
=> ( c @ Y1 @ sK13 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( ( c @ Y1 @ sK13 )
=> ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f353]) ).
thf(f355,plain,
! [X1: reg] :
( $true
= ( ^ [Y0: reg] :
( ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( ( c @ Y1 @ sK13 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
=> ( c @ Y3 @ sK13 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
=> ( c @ Y3 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) )
& ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
=> ( c @ Y3 @ Y0 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y3: reg] :
( ( c @ Y3 @ Y2 )
=> ( c @ Y3 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
& ~ ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 )
=> ( c @ Y1 @ sK13 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( ( c @ Y1 @ sK13 )
=> ( c @ Y1 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
@ X1 ) ),
inference(pi_proxy_clausification,[],[f354]) ).
thf(f356,plain,
! [X1: reg] :
( $true
= ( ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y0: reg] :
( ( c @ Y0 @ sK13 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
=> ( c @ Y2 @ sK13 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
=> ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) )
& ( c @ Y0 @ X1 )
& ~ ( ?? @ reg
@ ^ [Y1: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
=> ( c @ Y2 @ X1 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y2: reg] :
( ( c @ Y2 @ Y1 )
=> ( c @ Y2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
& ~ ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y0: reg] :
( ( c @ Y0 @ X1 )
=> ( c @ Y0 @ sK13 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y0: reg] :
( ( c @ Y0 @ sK13 )
=> ( c @ Y0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f355]) ).
thf(f357,plain,
! [X1: reg] :
( $true
= ( ~ ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y0: reg] :
( ( c @ Y0 @ X1 )
=> ( c @ Y0 @ sK13 ) ) )
& ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y0: reg] :
( ( c @ Y0 @ sK13 )
=> ( c @ Y0 @ X1 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f356]) ).
thf(f396,plain,
! [X1: reg] :
( $true
= ( ~ ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y0: reg] :
( ( c @ Y0 @ X1 )
=> ( c @ Y0 @ sK13 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f357]) ).
thf(f397,plain,
! [X1: reg] :
( ( !! @ reg
@ ^ [Y0: reg] :
( ( c @ Y0 @ X1 )
=> ( c @ Y0 @ sK13 ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f396]) ).
thf(f398,plain,
! [X1: reg] :
( ( ^ [Y0: reg] :
( ( c @ Y0 @ X1 )
=> ( c @ Y0 @ sK13 ) )
@ ( sK16 @ X1 ) )
= $false ),
inference(sigma_proxy_clausification,[],[f397]) ).
thf(f399,plain,
! [X1: reg] :
( ( ( c @ ( sK16 @ X1 ) @ X1 )
=> ( c @ ( sK16 @ X1 ) @ sK13 ) )
= $false ),
inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f398]) ).
thf(f400,plain,
! [X1: reg] :
( ( c @ ( sK16 @ X1 ) @ sK13 )
= $false ),
inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f399]) ).
thf(f401,plain,
! [X1: reg] :
( $true
= ( c @ ( sK16 @ X1 ) @ X1 ) ),
inference(imp_proxy_clausification,[],[f399]) ).
thf(f578,plain,
$true = $false,
inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f401,f400]) ).
thf(f581,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f578]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : GEG018^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.18 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 18:34:31 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.19 Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.22 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.23 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.28 % (485150)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.20/0.28 % (485161)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sil=128000:e2e=on:si=on:random_seed=2988091045:s2a=on:i=75:s2at=3:aac=none:bd=preordered:rtra=on:fe=abstraction_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.20/0.28 % (485157)lrs+10_16_si=on:nwc=1.5:random_seed=4074553781:i=18:kws=arity_squared:rtra=on:fe=abstraction:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.20/0.28 % (485156)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=4170411719:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.20/0.28 % (485158)lrs+10_1_cnfonf=off:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=2363971380:i=3:rtra=on:inj=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.20/0.28 % (485158)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.20/0.28 % (485158)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.28 % (485158)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.28 % (485158)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.28 % (485158)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.28 % (485158)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 0.20/0.28 % (485158)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.20/0.28 % (485158)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.28 % (485158)Peak memory usage: 10 MB
% 0.20/0.28 % (485158)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.20/0.28 % (485161) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-485150-485161"...
% 0.20/0.28 % (485161)...printing done.
% 0.20/0.28 % (485161)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.28 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.28 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.28 % (485161)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.28 % (485161)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.28 % (485161)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.28 % (485161)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.28 % (485161)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.28 % (485161)Time elapsed: 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.28 % (485161)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.20/0.28 % (485161)Instructions burned: 42 (million)
% 0.20/0.28 % (485150)Success in time 0.044 s
% 0.20/0.28 % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------