%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : GEG020^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 07:49:20 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.99s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 38
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 92 ( 36 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 435 ( 21 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 35 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 1329 ( 137 ~; 142 |; 91 &; 897 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 62 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 25 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 8 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 34 ( 32 usr; 13 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 211 ( 46 ^; 136 !; 29 ?; 211 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
reg: $tType ).
thf(decl_38,type,
mbox: ( $i > $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_50,type,
mvalid: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_54,type,
c: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(decl_56,type,
p: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(decl_58,type,
o: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(decl_60,type,
ec: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(decl_61,type,
pp: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(decl_62,type,
tpp: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(decl_63,type,
ntpp: reg > reg > $o ).
thf(decl_64,type,
catalunya: reg ).
thf(decl_65,type,
france: reg ).
thf(decl_66,type,
spain: reg ).
thf(decl_67,type,
paris: reg ).
thf(decl_68,type,
a: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_70,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
thf(decl_71,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
thf(decl_72,type,
esk3_0: reg ).
thf(decl_73,type,
esk4_0: reg ).
thf(decl_74,type,
esk5_0: reg ).
thf(decl_75,type,
esk6_1: reg > reg ).
thf(decl_76,type,
esk7_1: reg > reg ).
thf(decl_77,type,
esk8_1: reg > reg ).
thf(decl_78,type,
esk9_1: reg > reg ).
thf(decl_81,type,
esk12_0: reg ).
thf(decl_82,type,
esk13_1: reg > reg ).
thf(decl_83,type,
esk14_1: reg > reg ).
thf(decl_84,type,
esk15_0: reg ).
thf(decl_85,type,
esk16_0: reg ).
thf(decl_86,type,
esk17_1: reg > reg ).
thf(decl_87,type,
esk18_1: reg > reg ).
thf(decl_88,type,
esk19_1: reg > reg ).
thf(decl_89,type,
esk20_1: reg > reg ).
thf(o,axiom,
( o
= ( ^ [X28: reg,X29: reg] :
? [X25: reg] :
( ( p @ X25 @ X28 )
& ( p @ X25 @ X29 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Suryb2B6aj/E---3.1_1190563.p',o) ).
thf(p,axiom,
( p
= ( ^ [X23: reg,X24: reg] :
! [X25: reg] :
( ( c @ X25 @ X23 )
=> ( c @ X25 @ X24 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Suryb2B6aj/E---3.1_1190563.p',p) ).
thf(con,conjecture,
( mvalid
@ ( mbox @ a
@ ^ [X44: $i] :
! [X25: reg] :
( ( ( o @ X25 @ paris )
| ( o @ X25 @ catalunya ) )
=> ( ( o @ X25 @ spain )
| ( o @ X25 @ france ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Suryb2B6aj/E---3.1_1190563.p',con) ).
thf(mbox,axiom,
( mbox
= ( ^ [X13: $i > $i > $o,X6: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
! [X14: $i] :
( ~ ( X13 @ X3 @ X14 )
| ( X6 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Suryb2B6aj/E---3.1_1190563.p',mbox) ).
thf(mvalid,axiom,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [X6: $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i] : ( X6 @ X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Suryb2B6aj/E---3.1_1190563.p',mvalid) ).
thf(c_symmetric,axiom,
! [X19: reg,X20: reg] :
( ( c @ X19 @ X20 )
=> ( c @ X20 @ X19 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Suryb2B6aj/E---3.1_1190563.p',c_symmetric) ).
thf(pp,axiom,
( pp
= ( ^ [X34: reg,X35: reg] :
( ( p @ X34 @ X35 )
& ~ ( p @ X35 @ X34 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Suryb2B6aj/E---3.1_1190563.p',pp) ).
thf(ec,axiom,
( ec
= ( ^ [X32: reg,X33: reg] :
( ( c @ X32 @ X33 )
& ~ ( o @ X32 @ X33 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Suryb2B6aj/E---3.1_1190563.p',ec) ).
thf(tpp,axiom,
( tpp
= ( ^ [X36: reg,X37: reg] :
( ( pp @ X36 @ X37 )
& ? [X25: reg] :
( ( ec @ X25 @ X36 )
& ( ec @ X25 @ X37 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Suryb2B6aj/E---3.1_1190563.p',tpp) ).
thf(ax1,axiom,
( mvalid
@ ( mbox @ a
@ ^ [X41: $i] : ( tpp @ catalunya @ spain ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Suryb2B6aj/E---3.1_1190563.p',ax1) ).
thf(ntpp,axiom,
( ntpp
= ( ^ [X38: reg,X39: reg] :
( ( pp @ X38 @ X39 )
& ~ ? [X25: reg] :
( ( ec @ X25 @ X38 )
& ( ec @ X25 @ X39 ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Suryb2B6aj/E---3.1_1190563.p',ntpp) ).
thf(ax3,axiom,
( mvalid
@ ( mbox @ a
@ ^ [X43: $i] : ( ntpp @ paris @ france ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Suryb2B6aj/E---3.1_1190563.p',ax3) ).
thf(c_0_12,plain,
( o
= ( ^ [Z0: reg,Z1: reg] :
? [X25: reg] :
( ! [X48: reg] :
( ( c @ X48 @ X25 )
=> ( c @ X48 @ Z0 ) )
& ! [X49: reg] :
( ( c @ X49 @ X25 )
=> ( c @ X49 @ Z1 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[o]) ).
thf(c_0_13,plain,
( p
= ( ^ [Z0: reg,Z1: reg] :
! [X25: reg] :
( ( c @ X25 @ Z0 )
=> ( c @ X25 @ Z1 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p]) ).
thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mvalid
@ ( mbox @ a
@ ^ [X44: $i] :
! [X25: reg] :
( ( ( o @ X25 @ paris )
| ( o @ X25 @ catalunya ) )
=> ( ( o @ X25 @ spain )
| ( o @ X25 @ france ) ) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
thf(c_0_15,plain,
( o
= ( ^ [Z0: reg,Z1: reg] :
? [X25: reg] :
( ! [X48: reg] :
( ( c @ X48 @ X25 )
=> ( c @ X48 @ Z0 ) )
& ! [X49: reg] :
( ( c @ X49 @ X25 )
=> ( c @ X49 @ Z1 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_16,plain,
( mbox
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
! [X14: $i] :
( ~ ( Z0 @ Z2 @ X14 )
| ( Z1 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox]) ).
thf(c_0_17,plain,
( mvalid
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
! [X3: $i] : ( Z0 @ X3 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid]) ).
thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X84: $i,X83: $i] :
( ~ ( a @ X84 @ X83 )
| ! [X25: reg] :
( ( ? [X71: reg] :
( ! [X72: reg] :
( ( c @ X72 @ X71 )
=> ( c @ X72 @ X25 ) )
& ! [X73: reg] :
( ( c @ X73 @ X71 )
=> ( c @ X73 @ paris ) ) )
| ? [X74: reg] :
( ! [X75: reg] :
( ( c @ X75 @ X74 )
=> ( c @ X75 @ X25 ) )
& ! [X76: reg] :
( ( c @ X76 @ X74 )
=> ( c @ X76 @ catalunya ) ) ) )
=> ( ? [X77: reg] :
( ! [X78: reg] :
( ( c @ X78 @ X77 )
=> ( c @ X78 @ X25 ) )
& ! [X79: reg] :
( ( c @ X79 @ X77 )
=> ( c @ X79 @ spain ) ) )
| ? [X80: reg] :
( ! [X81: reg] :
( ( c @ X81 @ X80 )
=> ( c @ X81 @ X25 ) )
& ! [X82: reg] :
( ( c @ X82 @ X80 )
=> ( c @ X82 @ france ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
thf(c_0_19,plain,
! [X171: reg,X172: reg] :
( ~ ( c @ X171 @ X172 )
| ( c @ X172 @ X171 ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_symmetric])]) ).
thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
! [X128: reg,X129: reg,X131: reg,X132: reg,X133: reg,X136: reg] :
( ( a @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
& ( ~ ( c @ X131 @ esk5_0 )
| ( c @ X131 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( c @ X128 @ esk4_0 )
| ( c @ X128 @ esk3_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ X132 @ esk5_0 )
| ( c @ X132 @ catalunya )
| ~ ( c @ X128 @ esk4_0 )
| ( c @ X128 @ esk3_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ X131 @ esk5_0 )
| ( c @ X131 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( c @ X129 @ esk4_0 )
| ( c @ X129 @ paris ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ X132 @ esk5_0 )
| ( c @ X132 @ catalunya )
| ~ ( c @ X129 @ esk4_0 )
| ( c @ X129 @ paris ) )
& ( ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ X133 ) @ X133 )
| ( c @ ( esk6_1 @ X133 ) @ X133 ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ X133 ) @ spain )
| ( c @ ( esk6_1 @ X133 ) @ X133 ) )
& ( ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ X133 ) @ X133 )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk6_1 @ X133 ) @ esk3_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ X133 ) @ spain )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk6_1 @ X133 ) @ esk3_0 ) )
& ( ( c @ ( esk9_1 @ X136 ) @ X136 )
| ( c @ ( esk8_1 @ X136 ) @ X136 ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ ( esk9_1 @ X136 ) @ france )
| ( c @ ( esk8_1 @ X136 ) @ X136 ) )
& ( ( c @ ( esk9_1 @ X136 ) @ X136 )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk8_1 @ X136 ) @ esk3_0 ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ ( esk9_1 @ X136 ) @ france )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk8_1 @ X136 ) @ esk3_0 ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_21,plain,
( pp
= ( ^ [Z0: reg,Z1: reg] :
( ! [X53: reg] :
( ( c @ X53 @ Z0 )
=> ( c @ X53 @ Z1 ) )
& ~ ! [X54: reg] :
( ( c @ X54 @ Z1 )
=> ( c @ X54 @ Z0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[pp]) ).
thf(c_0_22,plain,
( ec
= ( ^ [Z0: reg,Z1: reg] :
( ( c @ Z0 @ Z1 )
& ~ ? [X50: reg] :
( ! [X51: reg] :
( ( c @ X51 @ X50 )
=> ( c @ X51 @ Z0 ) )
& ! [X52: reg] :
( ( c @ X52 @ X50 )
=> ( c @ X52 @ Z1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ec]) ).
thf(c_0_23,plain,
! [X18: reg,X19: reg] :
( ( c @ X19 @ X18 )
| ~ ( c @ X18 @ X19 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ( c @ ( esk9_1 @ X18 ) @ X18 )
| ( c @ ( esk8_1 @ X18 ) @ X18 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ( c @ ( esk9_1 @ X18 ) @ X18 )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk8_1 @ X18 ) @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_26,plain,
( tpp
= ( ^ [Z0: reg,Z1: reg] :
( ! [X55: reg] :
( ( c @ X55 @ Z0 )
=> ( c @ X55 @ Z1 ) )
& ~ ! [X56: reg] :
( ( c @ X56 @ Z1 )
=> ( c @ X56 @ Z0 ) )
& ? [X25: reg] :
( ( c @ X25 @ Z0 )
& ~ ? [X57: reg] :
( ! [X58: reg] :
( ( c @ X58 @ X57 )
=> ( c @ X58 @ X25 ) )
& ! [X59: reg] :
( ( c @ X59 @ X57 )
=> ( c @ X59 @ Z0 ) ) )
& ( c @ X25 @ Z1 )
& ~ ? [X60: reg] :
( ! [X61: reg] :
( ( c @ X61 @ X60 )
=> ( c @ X61 @ X25 ) )
& ! [X62: reg] :
( ( c @ X62 @ X60 )
=> ( c @ X62 @ Z1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[tpp]) ).
thf(c_0_27,plain,
( pp
= ( ^ [Z0: reg,Z1: reg] :
( ! [X53: reg] :
( ( c @ X53 @ Z0 )
=> ( c @ X53 @ Z1 ) )
& ~ ! [X54: reg] :
( ( c @ X54 @ Z1 )
=> ( c @ X54 @ Z0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_28,plain,
( ec
= ( ^ [Z0: reg,Z1: reg] :
( ( c @ Z0 @ Z1 )
& ~ ? [X50: reg] :
( ! [X51: reg] :
( ( c @ X51 @ X50 )
=> ( c @ X51 @ Z0 ) )
& ! [X52: reg] :
( ( c @ X52 @ X50 )
=> ( c @ X52 @ Z1 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_15]) ).
thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg,X19: reg] :
( ( c @ X18 @ esk3_0 )
| ( c @ X19 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( c @ X18 @ esk5_0 )
| ~ ( c @ X19 @ esk4_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ( c @ ( esk8_1 @ X18 ) @ X18 )
| ( c @ X18 @ ( esk9_1 @ X18 ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
thf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ( c @ X18 @ ( esk9_1 @ X18 ) )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk8_1 @ X18 ) @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_25]) ).
thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ X18 ) @ X18 )
| ( c @ ( esk6_1 @ X18 ) @ X18 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ X18 ) @ X18 )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk6_1 @ X18 ) @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_34,plain,
( tpp
= ( ^ [Z0: reg,Z1: reg] :
( ! [X55: reg] :
( ( c @ X55 @ Z0 )
=> ( c @ X55 @ Z1 ) )
& ~ ! [X56: reg] :
( ( c @ X56 @ Z1 )
=> ( c @ X56 @ Z0 ) )
& ? [X25: reg] :
( ( c @ X25 @ Z0 )
& ~ ? [X57: reg] :
( ! [X58: reg] :
( ( c @ X58 @ X57 )
=> ( c @ X58 @ X25 ) )
& ! [X59: reg] :
( ( c @ X59 @ X57 )
=> ( c @ X59 @ Z0 ) ) )
& ( c @ X25 @ Z1 )
& ~ ? [X60: reg] :
( ! [X61: reg] :
( ( c @ X61 @ X60 )
=> ( c @ X61 @ X25 ) )
& ! [X62: reg] :
( ( c @ X62 @ X60 )
=> ( c @ X62 @ Z1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).
thf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ( c @ esk4_0 @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) )
| ( c @ X18 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( c @ X18 @ esk5_0 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).
thf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ( c @ ( esk6_1 @ X18 ) @ X18 )
| ( c @ X18 @ ( esk7_1 @ X18 ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_32]) ).
thf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ( c @ X18 @ ( esk7_1 @ X18 ) )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk6_1 @ X18 ) @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_33]) ).
thf(c_0_38,plain,
! [X111: $i,X110: $i] :
( ~ ( a @ X111 @ X110 )
| ( ! [X101: reg] :
( ( c @ X101 @ catalunya )
=> ( c @ X101 @ spain ) )
& ~ ! [X102: reg] :
( ( c @ X102 @ spain )
=> ( c @ X102 @ catalunya ) )
& ? [X103: reg] :
( ( c @ X103 @ catalunya )
& ~ ? [X104: reg] :
( ! [X105: reg] :
( ( c @ X105 @ X104 )
=> ( c @ X105 @ X103 ) )
& ! [X106: reg] :
( ( c @ X106 @ X104 )
=> ( c @ X106 @ catalunya ) ) )
& ( c @ X103 @ spain )
& ~ ? [X107: reg] :
( ! [X108: reg] :
( ( c @ X108 @ X107 )
=> ( c @ X108 @ X103 ) )
& ! [X109: reg] :
( ( c @ X109 @ X107 )
=> ( c @ X109 @ spain ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax1]),c_0_34]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
thf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg,X19: reg] :
( ( c @ X18 @ catalunya )
| ( c @ X19 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( c @ X18 @ esk5_0 )
| ~ ( c @ X19 @ esk4_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
( ( c @ esk5_0 @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ) )
| ( c @ esk4_0 @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37]) ).
thf(c_0_41,plain,
! [X155: $i,X156: $i,X157: reg,X160: reg,X163: reg] :
( ( ~ ( c @ X157 @ catalunya )
| ( c @ X157 @ spain )
| ~ ( a @ X155 @ X156 ) )
& ( ( c @ esk15_0 @ spain )
| ~ ( a @ X155 @ X156 ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ esk15_0 @ catalunya )
| ~ ( a @ X155 @ X156 ) )
& ( ( c @ esk16_0 @ catalunya )
| ~ ( a @ X155 @ X156 ) )
& ( ( c @ ( esk18_1 @ X160 ) @ X160 )
| ( c @ ( esk17_1 @ X160 ) @ X160 )
| ~ ( a @ X155 @ X156 ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ ( esk18_1 @ X160 ) @ catalunya )
| ( c @ ( esk17_1 @ X160 ) @ X160 )
| ~ ( a @ X155 @ X156 ) )
& ( ( c @ ( esk18_1 @ X160 ) @ X160 )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk17_1 @ X160 ) @ esk16_0 )
| ~ ( a @ X155 @ X156 ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ ( esk18_1 @ X160 ) @ catalunya )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk17_1 @ X160 ) @ esk16_0 )
| ~ ( a @ X155 @ X156 ) )
& ( ( c @ esk16_0 @ spain )
| ~ ( a @ X155 @ X156 ) )
& ( ( c @ ( esk20_1 @ X163 ) @ X163 )
| ( c @ ( esk19_1 @ X163 ) @ X163 )
| ~ ( a @ X155 @ X156 ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ ( esk20_1 @ X163 ) @ spain )
| ( c @ ( esk19_1 @ X163 ) @ X163 )
| ~ ( a @ X155 @ X156 ) )
& ( ( c @ ( esk20_1 @ X163 ) @ X163 )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk19_1 @ X163 ) @ esk16_0 )
| ~ ( a @ X155 @ X156 ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ ( esk20_1 @ X163 ) @ spain )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk19_1 @ X163 ) @ esk16_0 )
| ~ ( a @ X155 @ X156 ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_38])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ( c @ esk4_0 @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) )
| ( c @ X18 @ catalunya )
| ~ ( c @ X18 @ esk5_0 ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).
thf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
( ( c @ esk4_0 @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) )
| ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ esk5_0 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_40]) ).
thf(c_0_44,plain,
! [X18: reg,X3: $i,X14: $i] :
( ( c @ X18 @ spain )
| ~ ( c @ X18 @ catalunya )
| ~ ( a @ X3 @ X14 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).
thf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
( ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ catalunya )
| ( c @ esk4_0 @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).
thf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X14: $i] :
( ( c @ esk4_0 @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) )
| ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ spain )
| ~ ( a @ X3 @ X14 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]) ).
thf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
a @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ( c @ ( esk6_1 @ X18 ) @ X18 )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ X18 ) @ spain ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
( ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ spain )
| ( c @ esk4_0 @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).
thf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ~ ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ X18 ) @ spain )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk6_1 @ X18 ) @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
( ( c @ esk4_0 @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) )
| ( c @ ( esk6_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ esk5_0 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).
thf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
( ( c @ esk4_0 @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk6_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_49]) ).
thf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
c @ esk4_0 @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_51]),c_0_52]) ).
thf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg,X19: reg] :
( ( c @ X18 @ esk3_0 )
| ( c @ X19 @ paris )
| ~ ( c @ X18 @ esk5_0 )
| ~ ( c @ X19 @ esk4_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
c @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) @ esk4_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_53]) ).
thf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ( c @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) @ paris )
| ( c @ X18 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( c @ X18 @ esk5_0 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).
thf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
( ( c @ esk5_0 @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ) )
| ( c @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) @ paris ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_36]),c_0_37]) ).
thf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg,X19: reg] :
( ( c @ X18 @ catalunya )
| ( c @ X19 @ paris )
| ~ ( c @ X18 @ esk5_0 )
| ~ ( c @ X19 @ esk4_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
( ( c @ esk5_0 @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ) )
| ( c @ paris @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_57]) ).
thf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ( c @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) @ paris )
| ( c @ X18 @ catalunya )
| ~ ( c @ X18 @ esk5_0 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_55]) ).
thf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
( ( c @ paris @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) )
| ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ esk5_0 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_59]) ).
thf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
( ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ catalunya )
| ( c @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) @ paris ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]),c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
( ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ catalunya )
| ( c @ paris @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_62]) ).
thf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X14: $i] :
( ( c @ paris @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) )
| ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ spain )
| ~ ( a @ X3 @ X14 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_63]) ).
thf(c_0_65,plain,
( ntpp
= ( ^ [Z0: reg,Z1: reg] :
( ! [X63: reg] :
( ( c @ X63 @ Z0 )
=> ( c @ X63 @ Z1 ) )
& ~ ! [X64: reg] :
( ( c @ X64 @ Z1 )
=> ( c @ X64 @ Z0 ) )
& ~ ? [X25: reg] :
( ( c @ X25 @ Z0 )
& ~ ? [X65: reg] :
( ! [X66: reg] :
( ( c @ X66 @ X65 )
=> ( c @ X66 @ X25 ) )
& ! [X67: reg] :
( ( c @ X67 @ X65 )
=> ( c @ X67 @ Z0 ) ) )
& ( c @ X25 @ Z1 )
& ~ ? [X68: reg] :
( ! [X69: reg] :
( ( c @ X69 @ X68 )
=> ( c @ X69 @ X25 ) )
& ! [X70: reg] :
( ( c @ X70 @ X68 )
=> ( c @ X70 @ Z1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ntpp]) ).
thf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
( ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ spain )
| ( c @ paris @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_47]) ).
thf(c_0_67,plain,
( ntpp
= ( ^ [Z0: reg,Z1: reg] :
( ! [X63: reg] :
( ( c @ X63 @ Z0 )
=> ( c @ X63 @ Z1 ) )
& ~ ! [X64: reg] :
( ( c @ X64 @ Z1 )
=> ( c @ X64 @ Z0 ) )
& ~ ? [X25: reg] :
( ( c @ X25 @ Z0 )
& ~ ? [X65: reg] :
( ! [X66: reg] :
( ( c @ X66 @ X65 )
=> ( c @ X66 @ X25 ) )
& ! [X67: reg] :
( ( c @ X67 @ X65 )
=> ( c @ X67 @ Z0 ) ) )
& ( c @ X25 @ Z1 )
& ~ ? [X68: reg] :
( ! [X69: reg] :
( ( c @ X69 @ X68 )
=> ( c @ X69 @ X25 ) )
& ! [X70: reg] :
( ( c @ X70 @ X68 )
=> ( c @ X70 @ Z1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_65,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).
thf(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
( ( c @ paris @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) )
| ( c @ ( esk6_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ esk5_0 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_66]) ).
thf(c_0_69,plain,
! [X100: $i,X99: $i] :
( ~ ( a @ X100 @ X99 )
| ( ! [X90: reg] :
( ( c @ X90 @ paris )
=> ( c @ X90 @ france ) )
& ~ ! [X91: reg] :
( ( c @ X91 @ france )
=> ( c @ X91 @ paris ) )
& ~ ? [X92: reg] :
( ( c @ X92 @ paris )
& ~ ? [X93: reg] :
( ! [X94: reg] :
( ( c @ X94 @ X93 )
=> ( c @ X94 @ X92 ) )
& ! [X95: reg] :
( ( c @ X95 @ X93 )
=> ( c @ X95 @ paris ) ) )
& ( c @ X92 @ france )
& ~ ? [X96: reg] :
( ! [X97: reg] :
( ( c @ X97 @ X96 )
=> ( c @ X97 @ X92 ) )
& ! [X98: reg] :
( ( c @ X98 @ X96 )
=> ( c @ X98 @ france ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax3]),c_0_67]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
thf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
( ( c @ ( esk6_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ esk3_0 )
| ( c @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) @ paris ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_68]),c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_71,negated_conjecture,
( ( c @ paris @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk6_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_66]) ).
thf(c_0_72,plain,
! [X144: $i,X145: $i,X146: reg,X148: reg,X150: reg,X151: reg,X153: reg,X154: reg] :
( ( ~ ( c @ X146 @ paris )
| ( c @ X146 @ france )
| ~ ( a @ X144 @ X145 ) )
& ( ( c @ esk12_0 @ france )
| ~ ( a @ X144 @ X145 ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ esk12_0 @ paris )
| ~ ( a @ X144 @ X145 ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ X153 @ ( esk14_1 @ X148 ) )
| ( c @ X153 @ X148 )
| ~ ( c @ X148 @ france )
| ~ ( c @ X150 @ ( esk13_1 @ X148 ) )
| ( c @ X150 @ X148 )
| ~ ( c @ X148 @ paris )
| ~ ( a @ X144 @ X145 ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ X154 @ ( esk14_1 @ X148 ) )
| ( c @ X154 @ france )
| ~ ( c @ X148 @ france )
| ~ ( c @ X150 @ ( esk13_1 @ X148 ) )
| ( c @ X150 @ X148 )
| ~ ( c @ X148 @ paris )
| ~ ( a @ X144 @ X145 ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ X153 @ ( esk14_1 @ X148 ) )
| ( c @ X153 @ X148 )
| ~ ( c @ X148 @ france )
| ~ ( c @ X151 @ ( esk13_1 @ X148 ) )
| ( c @ X151 @ paris )
| ~ ( c @ X148 @ paris )
| ~ ( a @ X144 @ X145 ) )
& ( ~ ( c @ X154 @ ( esk14_1 @ X148 ) )
| ( c @ X154 @ france )
| ~ ( c @ X148 @ france )
| ~ ( c @ X151 @ ( esk13_1 @ X148 ) )
| ( c @ X151 @ paris )
| ~ ( c @ X148 @ paris )
| ~ ( a @ X144 @ X145 ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_69])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_73,negated_conjecture,
c @ paris @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_70]),c_0_71]) ).
thf(c_0_74,plain,
! [X18: reg,X3: $i,X14: $i] :
( ( c @ X18 @ france )
| ~ ( c @ X18 @ paris )
| ~ ( a @ X3 @ X14 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_72]) ).
thf(c_0_75,negated_conjecture,
c @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) @ paris,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_73]) ).
thf(c_0_76,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X14: $i] :
( ( c @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) @ france )
| ~ ( a @ X3 @ X14 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_75]) ).
thf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ( c @ ( esk8_1 @ X18 ) @ X18 )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk9_1 @ X18 ) @ france ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_78,negated_conjecture,
c @ ( esk9_1 @ esk4_0 ) @ france,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_47]) ).
thf(c_0_79,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ~ ( c @ ( esk9_1 @ X18 ) @ france )
| ~ ( c @ ( esk8_1 @ X18 ) @ esk3_0 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
c @ ( esk8_1 @ esk4_0 ) @ esk4_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_78]) ).
thf(c_0_81,negated_conjecture,
~ ( c @ ( esk8_1 @ esk4_0 ) @ esk3_0 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_78]) ).
thf(c_0_82,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ( c @ X18 @ esk3_0 )
| ~ ( c @ X18 @ esk5_0 ) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_80]),c_0_81]) ).
thf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
c @ esk5_0 @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_36]),c_0_37]) ).
thf(c_0_84,negated_conjecture,
! [X18: reg] :
( ( c @ X18 @ catalunya )
| ~ ( c @ X18 @ esk5_0 ) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_80]),c_0_81]) ).
thf(c_0_85,negated_conjecture,
c @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ esk5_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_83]) ).
thf(c_0_86,negated_conjecture,
c @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ catalunya,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_85]) ).
thf(c_0_87,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i,X14: $i] :
( ( c @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ spain )
| ~ ( a @ X3 @ X14 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_86]) ).
thf(c_0_88,negated_conjecture,
c @ ( esk7_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ spain,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_47]) ).
thf(c_0_89,negated_conjecture,
c @ ( esk6_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ esk5_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_88]) ).
thf(c_0_90,negated_conjecture,
~ ( c @ ( esk6_1 @ esk5_0 ) @ esk3_0 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_88]) ).
thf(c_0_91,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_89]),c_0_90]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GEG020^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.16 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.16 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.16 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.16 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.16 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.16 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.16 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.16 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 18:34:47 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.16 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.16 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.20 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.22 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Suryb2B6aj/E---3.1_1190563.p
% 1.99/0.57 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 1.99/0.57 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN.
% 1.99/0.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.99/0.57 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.99/0.57 % Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.99/0.57 % Starting new_ho_12 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.99/0.57 % Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.99/0.57 % new_bool_2 with pid 1190579 completed with status 0
% 1.99/0.57 % Result found by new_bool_2
% 1.99/0.57 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN.
% 1.99/0.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.99/0.57 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.99/0.57 % Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.99/0.57 % Starting new_ho_12 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.99/0.57 % Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.99/0.57 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.99/0.57 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.99/0.57 % Search class: HGHNF-FFMF21-SHSSMSBN
% 1.99/0.57 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.99/0.57 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 1.99/0.57 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1190580 completed with status 0
% 1.99/0.57 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.99/0.57 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN.
% 1.99/0.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.99/0.57 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.99/0.57 % Starting post_as_ho3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.99/0.57 % Starting new_ho_12 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.99/0.57 % Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.99/0.57 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.99/0.57 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.99/0.57 % Search class: HGHNF-FFMF21-SHSSMSBN
% 1.99/0.57 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.99/0.57 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 1.99/0.57 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 1.99/0.57
% 1.99/0.57 % Proof found!
% 1.99/0.57 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.99/0.57 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.99/0.57 % Parsed axioms : 98
% 1.99/0.57 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 77
% 1.99/0.57 % Initial clauses : 46
% 1.99/0.57 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.99/0.57 % Initial clauses in saturation : 46
% 1.99/0.57 % Processed clauses : 2660
% 1.99/0.57 % ...of these trivial : 21
% 1.99/0.57 % ...subsumed : 650
% 1.99/0.57 % ...remaining for further processing : 1989
% 1.99/0.57 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.99/0.57 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.99/0.57 % Backward-subsumed : 913
% 1.99/0.57 % Backward-rewritten : 658
% 1.99/0.57 % Generated clauses : 12249
% 1.99/0.57 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11886
% 1.99/0.57 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.99/0.57 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 62
% 1.99/0.57 % Paramodulations : 12239
% 1.99/0.57 % Factorizations : 10
% 1.99/0.57 % NegExts : 0
% 1.99/0.58 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.99/0.58 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.99/0.58 % Total rewrite steps : 1044
% 1.99/0.58 % ...of those cached : 942
% 1.99/0.58 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.99/0.58 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.99/0.58 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.99/0.58 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.99/0.58 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.99/0.58 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.99/0.58 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.99/0.58 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.99/0.58 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.99/0.58 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.99/0.58 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.99/0.58 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.99/0.58 % Current number of processed clauses : 418
% 1.99/0.58 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 115
% 1.99/0.58 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.99/0.58 % Negative unit clauses : 6
% 1.99/0.58 % Non-unit-clauses : 297
% 1.99/0.58 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8002
% 1.99/0.58 % ...number of literals in the above : 36395
% 1.99/0.58 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.99/0.58 % Current number of archived clauses : 1571
% 1.99/0.58 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 567079
% 1.99/0.58 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 218884
% 1.99/0.58 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1306
% 1.99/0.58 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19205
% 1.99/0.58 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.99/0.58 % BW rewrite match attempts : 75
% 1.99/0.58 % BW rewrite match successes : 73
% 1.99/0.58 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.99/0.58 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.99/0.58 % Termbank termtop insertions : 207806
% 1.99/0.58 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2036
% 1.99/0.58
% 1.99/0.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.99/0.58 % User time : 0.320 s
% 1.99/0.58 % System time : 0.009 s
% 1.99/0.58 % Total time : 0.330 s
% 1.99/0.58 % Maximum resident set size: 3992 pages
% 1.99/0.58
% 1.99/0.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.99/0.58 % User time : 0.325 s
% 1.99/0.58 % System time : 0.013 s
% 1.99/0.58 % Total time : 0.337 s
% 1.99/0.58 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 1.99/0.58 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------