↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : GEG021_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:50:00 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.40s 1.36s
% Output   : Refutation 3.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  118 ( 100 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   9 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  115 (  10   ~;   0   |; 101   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   21 (  10 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number arithmetic     :  127 (  17 atm;   7 fun; 103 num;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr;   1 ari;   0 dat;   0 cdt)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   22 (   8 usr;  20 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (  44   !;   0   ?;  44   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    city: $tType ).

tff(func_def_0,type,
    d: ( city * city ) > $int ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    kiel: city ).

tff(func_def_2,type,
    hamburg: city ).

tff(func_def_3,type,
    berlin: city ).

tff(func_def_4,type,
    cologne: city ).

tff(func_def_5,type,
    frankfurt: city ).

tff(func_def_6,type,
    saarbruecken: city ).

tff(func_def_7,type,
    munich: city ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ( d(berlin,frankfurt) = 420 )
      & ( d(hamburg,cologne) = 360 )
      & ( d(munich,frankfurt) = 300 )
      & ( d(hamburg,kiel) = 90 )
      & ( d(munich,saarbruecken) = 360 )
      & ( d(cologne,frankfurt) = 150 )
      & ! [X0: city] : ( d(X0,X0) = 0 )
      & ( d(hamburg,frankfurt) = 390 )
      & ( d(berlin,cologne) = 480 )
      & ( d(berlin,munich) = 510 )
      & ( d(saarbruecken,cologne) = 190 )
      & ( d(hamburg,berlin) = 250 )
      & ( d(saarbruecken,frankfurt) = 160 )
      & ! [X1: city,X0: city,X2: city] : $lesseq(d(X0,X2),$sum(d(X0,X1),d(X1,X2)))
      & ! [X0: city,X1: city] : ( d(X0,X1) = d(X1,X0) ) )
   => $lesseq(d(cologne,berlin),500) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',city_distance_1) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ( d(berlin,frankfurt) = 420 )
        & ( d(hamburg,cologne) = 360 )
        & ( d(munich,frankfurt) = 300 )
        & ( d(hamburg,kiel) = 90 )
        & ( d(munich,saarbruecken) = 360 )
        & ( d(cologne,frankfurt) = 150 )
        & ! [X0: city] : ( d(X0,X0) = 0 )
        & ( d(hamburg,frankfurt) = 390 )
        & ( d(berlin,cologne) = 480 )
        & ( d(berlin,munich) = 510 )
        & ( d(saarbruecken,cologne) = 190 )
        & ( d(hamburg,berlin) = 250 )
        & ( d(saarbruecken,frankfurt) = 160 )
        & ! [X1: city,X0: city,X2: city] : $lesseq(d(X0,X2),$sum(d(X0,X1),d(X1,X2)))
        & ! [X0: city,X1: city] : ( d(X0,X1) = d(X1,X0) ) )
     => $lesseq(d(cologne,berlin),500) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

tff(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( d(berlin,frankfurt) = 420 )
        & ( d(hamburg,cologne) = 360 )
        & ( d(munich,frankfurt) = 300 )
        & ( d(hamburg,kiel) = 90 )
        & ( d(munich,saarbruecken) = 360 )
        & ( d(cologne,frankfurt) = 150 )
        & ! [X0: city] : ( d(X0,X0) = 0 )
        & ( d(hamburg,frankfurt) = 390 )
        & ( d(berlin,cologne) = 480 )
        & ( d(berlin,munich) = 510 )
        & ( d(saarbruecken,cologne) = 190 )
        & ( d(hamburg,berlin) = 250 )
        & ( d(saarbruecken,frankfurt) = 160 )
        & ! [X1: city,X0: city,X2: city] : ~ $less($sum(d(X0,X1),d(X1,X2)),d(X0,X2))
        & ! [X0: city,X1: city] : ( d(X0,X1) = d(X1,X0) ) )
     => ~ $less(500,d(cologne,berlin)) ),
    inference(theory_normalization,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [X5: city,X4: city] : ( d(X4,X5) = d(X5,X4) )
        & ! [X2: city,X1: city,X3: city] : ~ $less($sum(d(X2,X1),d(X1,X3)),d(X2,X3))
        & ( d(hamburg,berlin) = 250 )
        & ( d(saarbruecken,cologne) = 190 )
        & ( d(berlin,munich) = 510 )
        & ( d(berlin,frankfurt) = 420 )
        & ( d(saarbruecken,frankfurt) = 160 )
        & ( d(munich,frankfurt) = 300 )
        & ( d(hamburg,kiel) = 90 )
        & ( d(hamburg,cologne) = 360 )
        & ( d(berlin,cologne) = 480 )
        & ( d(cologne,frankfurt) = 150 )
        & ! [X0: city] : ( d(X0,X0) = 0 )
        & ( d(hamburg,frankfurt) = 390 )
        & ( d(munich,saarbruecken) = 360 ) )
     => ~ $less(500,d(cologne,berlin)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    ( $less(500,d(cologne,berlin))
    & ! [X5: city,X4: city] : ( d(X4,X5) = d(X5,X4) )
    & ! [X2: city,X1: city,X3: city] : ~ $less($sum(d(X2,X1),d(X1,X3)),d(X2,X3))
    & ( d(hamburg,berlin) = 250 )
    & ( d(saarbruecken,cologne) = 190 )
    & ( d(berlin,munich) = 510 )
    & ( d(berlin,frankfurt) = 420 )
    & ( d(saarbruecken,frankfurt) = 160 )
    & ( d(munich,frankfurt) = 300 )
    & ( d(hamburg,kiel) = 90 )
    & ( d(hamburg,cologne) = 360 )
    & ( d(berlin,cologne) = 480 )
    & ( d(cologne,frankfurt) = 150 )
    & ! [X0: city] : ( d(X0,X0) = 0 )
    & ( d(hamburg,frankfurt) = 390 )
    & ( d(munich,saarbruecken) = 360 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    ( ( d(munich,frankfurt) = 300 )
    & ( d(saarbruecken,frankfurt) = 160 )
    & ( d(berlin,munich) = 510 )
    & ( d(hamburg,berlin) = 250 )
    & ( d(hamburg,cologne) = 360 )
    & ( d(hamburg,kiel) = 90 )
    & ( d(hamburg,frankfurt) = 390 )
    & ( d(berlin,frankfurt) = 420 )
    & ! [X0: city] : ( d(X0,X0) = 0 )
    & ! [X2: city,X1: city,X3: city] : ~ $less($sum(d(X2,X1),d(X1,X3)),d(X2,X3))
    & ( d(berlin,cologne) = 480 )
    & ( d(saarbruecken,cologne) = 190 )
    & ( d(munich,saarbruecken) = 360 )
    & ( d(cologne,frankfurt) = 150 )
    & $less(500,d(cologne,berlin))
    & ! [X5: city,X4: city] : ( d(X4,X5) = d(X5,X4) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f17]) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    ( ( d(munich,frankfurt) = 300 )
    & ( d(saarbruecken,frankfurt) = 160 )
    & ( d(berlin,munich) = 510 )
    & ( d(hamburg,berlin) = 250 )
    & ( d(hamburg,cologne) = 360 )
    & ( d(hamburg,kiel) = 90 )
    & ( d(hamburg,frankfurt) = 390 )
    & ( d(berlin,frankfurt) = 420 )
    & ! [X0: city] : ( d(X0,X0) = 0 )
    & ! [X1: city,X2: city,X3: city] : ~ $less($sum(d(X1,X2),d(X2,X3)),d(X1,X3))
    & ( d(berlin,cologne) = 480 )
    & ( d(saarbruecken,cologne) = 190 )
    & ( d(munich,saarbruecken) = 360 )
    & ( d(cologne,frankfurt) = 150 )
    & $less(500,d(cologne,berlin))
    & ! [X4: city,X5: city] : ( d(X4,X5) = d(X5,X4) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f18]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ! [X4: city,X5: city] : ( d(X4,X5) = d(X5,X4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    $less(500,d(cologne,berlin)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    d(berlin,cologne) = 480,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tff(f69,plain,
    $less(500,d(berlin,cologne)),
    inference(superposition,[],[f21,f20]) ).

tff(f88,plain,
    $less(500,480),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f69,f25]) ).

tff(f89,plain,
    $false,
    inference(evaluation,[],[f88]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEG021_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:31:41 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.40/1.36  % (2465969)Detected arithmetic, will pick strategies from an ALASCA-aware ARI schedule.
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466025)dis+1002_16:1_to=lpo:sil=64000:sas=z3:si=on:norm_ineq=on:gve=force:uwa=one_side_constant:random_seed=297048894:i=12:doe=on:rtra=on:gtg=exists_top:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/12Mi)
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466025)Instruction limit reached! 
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466025)------------------------------
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466025)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466025)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466025)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466025)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466025)Termination phase: Saturation
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466025)Time elapsed: 0.019 s
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466025)Peak memory usage: 115 MB
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466025)Instructions burned: 13 (million)
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466031)lrs+10_1_tgt=ground:sas=z3:si=on:random_seed=1884153550:i=33:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/33Mi)
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466027)dis+10_3_slsqr=1,4:to=lpo:sil=128000:thi=strong:si=on:uwa=off:s2agt=20:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=1538960061:i=201:slsql=off:asg=cautious:rtra=on:gtg=all:ss=axioms:sgt=16_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/201Mi)
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466029)dis+21_64_to=kbo:sil=128000:si=on:sp=weighted_frequency:uwa=alasca_can_abstract:random_seed=3492218978:i=4:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466026)dis+1002_1_to=kbo:sil=128000:tgt=ground:sas=z3:si=on:spb=units:tha=off:random_seed=129189091:i=307:kws=precedence:nm=0:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/307Mi)
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466028)lrs+1002_4:1_to=lpo:sil=64000:si=on:br=off:random_seed=3563344647:s2a=on:i=7:rtra=on:inst=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466030)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sas=z3:si=on:tha=off:random_seed=725093876:i=46:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/46Mi)
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466028)First to succeed.
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466029)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466028)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2465969"
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466027)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466030)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466031)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466026)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466033)dis+11_3_anc=none:drc=ordering:si=on:urr=ec_only:bce=on:tha=off:sac=on:random_seed=3646640505:st=5:i=14:sd=10:rtra=on:ss=axioms:rawr=on_2998 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/14Mi)
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466033)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466028)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 3.40/1.36  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.40/1.36  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466028)------------------------------
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466028)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466028)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466028)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466028)Termination reason: Refutation
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466028)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466028)Peak memory usage: 89 MB
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466028)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466028)------------------------------
% 3.40/1.36  % (2466028)------------------------------
% 3.40/1.36  % (2465969)Success in time 0.41 s
% 3.40/1.36  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------