↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 26.80s 27.02s
% Output   : Refutation 26.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : GEO001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.5.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 13:20:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.38  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.38  The process was started by sandbox on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.38  Sat Jun 18 13:20:44 2022
% 0.13/0.38  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 26055.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.38  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.38  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.38  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.38  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.38  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.38  40 back subsumes 37.
% 0.13/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 44 during input processing: 0 [copy,44,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.42/0.62  
% 0.42/0.62  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.42/0.62  
% 0.42/0.62  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.42/0.62  
% 0.42/0.62  
% 0.42/0.62  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.42/0.62  
% 0.42/0.62  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.42/0.62  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.42/0.62  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.42/0.62  number of clauses in intial UL: 38
% 0.42/0.62  number of clauses initially in problem: 43
% 0.42/0.62  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 88
% 0.42/0.62  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 92
% 0.42/0.62  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.42/0.62  absolute distinct symbol count: 14
% 0.42/0.62     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.42/0.62     distinct function count: 5
% 0.42/0.62     distinct constant count: 6
% 0.42/0.62  
% 0.42/0.62  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.42/0.62  
% 0.42/0.62  
% 0.42/0.62  
% 0.42/0.62  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.42/0.62  
% 0.42/0.62  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.42/0.62  
% 0.42/0.62  =========== start of search ===========
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! -- 
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Model 3 [ 5 31 115363 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Model 4 [ 84 18 45604 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Model 5 [ 103 14 49430 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Model 6 [ 75 14 43360 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Model 7 [ 90 14 42959 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Model 8 [ 74 33 121807 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Model 9 [ 82 13 40507 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Model 10 [ 111 43 143895 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Model 11 [ 79 33 122939 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Model 12 [ 159 46 158659 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Model 13 [ 241 11 35436 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Model 14 [ 101 23 86249 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Model 15 [ 142 28 105844 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at  26.60 sec ----> 4778 [binary,4777.1,18.1] {-} $F.
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Length of proof is 7.  Level of proof is 5.
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 26.80/27.02  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 26.80/27.02  % SZS output start Refutation
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  1 [] {+} -between(A,B,A)|A=B.
% 26.80/27.02  4 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,C)|A=B.
% 26.80/27.02  6 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(D,C,E)|between(A,outer_pasch(B,A,D,E,C),D).
% 26.80/27.02  7 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(D,C,E)|between(E,B,outer_pasch(B,A,D,E,C)).
% 26.80/27.02  18 [] {+} -between(c,b,a).
% 26.80/27.02  41 [] {+} between(A,B,extension(A,B,C,D)).
% 26.80/27.02  42 [] {+} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,C,D),C,D).
% 26.80/27.02  43 [] {-} between(a,b,c).
% 26.80/27.02  231,230 [hyper,42,4,flip.1] {+} extension(A,B,C,C)=B.
% 26.80/27.02  293 [para_into,230.1.1,1.2.1,demod,231,231] {+} A=B| -between(B,A,B).
% 26.80/27.02  295 [para_from,230.1.1,41.1.3] {+} between(A,B,B).
% 26.80/27.02  335 [hyper,295,7,43] {-} between(c,b,outer_pasch(b,A,a,c,b)).
% 26.80/27.02  340 [hyper,295,6,43] {-} between(A,outer_pasch(b,A,a,c,b),a).
% 26.80/27.02  4061 [hyper,340,293] {-} outer_pasch(b,a,a,c,b)=a.
% 26.80/27.02  4777 [para_from,4061.1.1,335.1.3] {-} between(c,b,a).
% 26.80/27.02  4778 [binary,4777.1,18.1] {-} $F.
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  % SZS output end Refutation
% 26.80/27.02  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  ============ end of search ============
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  true clauses given          11      (21.2%)
% 26.80/27.02  false clauses given         41
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02        FALSE     TRUE
% 26.80/27.02     8  0         27
% 26.80/27.02     9  8         39
% 26.80/27.02    10  1         5
% 26.80/27.02    11  2         2
% 26.80/27.02    12  41        65
% 26.80/27.02    13  122       94
% 26.80/27.02    14  95        8
% 26.80/27.02    15  6         0
% 26.80/27.02    16  22        19
% 26.80/27.02    17  41        57
% 26.80/27.02    18  13        22
% 26.80/27.02    19  28        12
% 26.80/27.02    20  9         21
% 26.80/27.02    21  82        167
% 26.80/27.02    22  109       60
% 26.80/27.02    23  16        50
% 26.80/27.02    24  22        58
% 26.80/27.02    25  82        112
% 26.80/27.02    26  104       78
% 26.80/27.02    27  98        135
% 26.80/27.02    28  45        19
% 26.80/27.02    29  31        24
% 26.80/27.02    30  68        70
% 26.80/27.02    31  93        63
% 26.80/27.02    32  60        21
% 26.80/27.02    33  20        51
% 26.80/27.02    34  79        13
% 26.80/27.02    35  70        66
% 26.80/27.02    36  79        58
% 26.80/27.02    37  30        110
% 26.80/27.02    38  16        15
% 26.80/27.02    39  59        21
% 26.80/27.02    40  75        45
% 26.80/27.02    41  68        99
% 26.80/27.02    42  62        22
% 26.80/27.02    43  24        10
% 26.80/27.02    44  55        12
% 26.80/27.02    45  69        44
% 26.80/27.02    46  55        42
% 26.80/27.02    47  15        17
% 26.80/27.02    48  9         1
% 26.80/27.02    49  34        12
% 26.80/27.02    50  85        15
% 26.80/27.02    51  33        75
% 26.80/27.02    52  22        18
% 26.80/27.02    53  8         4
% 26.80/27.02    54  23        1
% 26.80/27.02    55  36        25
% 26.80/27.02    56  21        6
% 26.80/27.02    58  2         1
% 26.80/27.02    59  15        0
% 26.80/27.02    60  18        3
% 26.80/27.02  tot:  2280      2014      (46.9% true)
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Model 15 [ 142 28 105844 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 26.80/27.02  
% 26.80/27.02  Process 26055 finished Sat Jun 18 13:21:10 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------