↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO003-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:15 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.07s 3.34s
% Output   : Refutation 3.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14  % Problem  : GEO003-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.5.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 17:38:11 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.39  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.22/0.39  The process was started by sandbox2 on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.22/0.39  Fri Jun 17 17:38:11 2022
% 0.22/0.39  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 8022.
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.22/0.39  set(auto).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.22/0.39  clear(print_given).
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  list(usable).
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.22/0.39  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.22/0.39  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.22/0.39  clauses in usable.
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  ------------> process usable:
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  ------------> process sos:
% 0.22/0.39  40 back subsumes 37.
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 43 during input processing: 0 [copy,43,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.50/0.72  
% 0.50/0.72  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.50/0.72  
% 0.50/0.72  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.50/0.72  
% 0.50/0.72  
% 0.50/0.72  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.50/0.72  
% 0.50/0.72  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.50/0.72  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.50/0.72  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.50/0.72  number of clauses in intial UL: 38
% 0.50/0.72  number of clauses initially in problem: 42
% 0.50/0.72  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 90
% 0.50/0.72  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 92
% 0.50/0.72  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.50/0.72  absolute distinct symbol count: 13
% 0.50/0.72     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.50/0.72     distinct function count: 5
% 0.50/0.72     distinct constant count: 5
% 0.50/0.72  
% 0.50/0.72  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.50/0.72  
% 0.50/0.72  
% 0.50/0.72  
% 0.50/0.72  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.50/0.72  
% 0.50/0.72  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.50/0.72  
% 0.50/0.72  =========== start of search ===========
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 3.07/3.34  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.07/3.34  % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  Model 4 [ 44 70 249456 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  Model 5 [ 72 49 152121 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  Model 6 [ 133 39 163177 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   2.93 sec ----> 127 [binary,126.1,18.1] {-} $F.
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 2.
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 3.07/3.34  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.07/3.34  % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  4 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,C)|A=B.
% 3.07/3.34  5 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,D)| -equidistant(A,B,E,F)|equidistant(C,D,E,F).
% 3.07/3.34  18 [] {+} -between(a,b,b).
% 3.07/3.34  40 [] {+} equidistant(A,B,B,A).
% 3.07/3.34  41 [] {+} between(A,B,extension(A,B,C,D)).
% 3.07/3.34  42 [] {+} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,C,D),C,D).
% 3.07/3.34  69 [para_into,41.1.3,4.2.1] {+} between(A,B,C)| -equidistant(extension(A,B,D,E),C,F,F).
% 3.07/3.34  78 [hyper,42,5,40] {+} equidistant(extension(A,B,C,D),B,C,D).
% 3.07/3.34  126 [hyper,69,78] {-} between(A,B,B).
% 3.07/3.34  127 [binary,126.1,18.1] {-} $F.
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  % SZS output end Refutation
% 3.07/3.34  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  ============ end of search ============
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  true clauses given           2      (28.6%)
% 3.07/3.34  false clauses given          5
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34        FALSE     TRUE
% 3.07/3.34     4  1         0
% 3.07/3.34     7  1         0
% 3.07/3.34     9  2         0
% 3.07/3.34    14  1         2
% 3.07/3.34    15  2         0
% 3.07/3.34    16  1         0
% 3.07/3.34    17  2         0
% 3.07/3.34    19  1         1
% 3.07/3.34    20  2         1
% 3.07/3.34    21  1         2
% 3.07/3.34    22  1         0
% 3.07/3.34    24  1         1
% 3.07/3.34    27  1         0
% 3.07/3.34    28  1         0
% 3.07/3.34    29  1         0
% 3.07/3.34    30  0         3
% 3.07/3.34    31  0         1
% 3.07/3.34    33  3         0
% 3.07/3.34    34  7         0
% 3.07/3.34    35  2         1
% 3.07/3.34    36  0         4
% 3.07/3.34    37  2         2
% 3.07/3.34    38  3         0
% 3.07/3.34    39  2         1
% 3.07/3.34    40  0         1
% 3.07/3.34    41  0         2
% 3.07/3.34    42  1         0
% 3.07/3.34    43  3         0
% 3.07/3.34    44  2         1
% 3.07/3.34    45  0         4
% 3.07/3.34    49  0         1
% 3.07/3.34    50  0         2
% 3.07/3.34  tot:  44        30      (40.5% true)
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  Model 6 [ 133 39 163177 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 3.07/3.34  
% 3.07/3.34  Process 8022 finished Fri Jun 17 17:38:14 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------