%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : GEO006-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n004.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:07:02 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.38s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO006-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 21:16:53 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.12/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S % 0.12/0.36 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS. % 0.12/0.36 # % 0.12/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.12/0.36 # Number of axioms: 23 Number of unprocessed: 23 % 0.12/0.36 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.12/0.36 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.12/0.36 # Hello from C++ % 0.12/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.12/0.36 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.12/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.12/0.36 # 23 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.12/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.12/0.36 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.12/0.36 # Found 10 unit axioms. % 0.12/0.36 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.12/0.36 # 13 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.12/0.36 # 10 unit axiom clauses % 0.12/0.36 % 0.12/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.12/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.12/0.36 # Returning from population with 16 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.12/0.36 # We now have 16 tableaux to operate on % 0.12/0.38 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.12/0.38 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.12/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.12/0.38 % 0.12/0.38 # End clausification derivation % 0.12/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_45, hypothesis, (between(a,c,d))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_42, hypothesis, (c!=a)). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_43, hypothesis, (d!=a)). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_44, hypothesis, (d!=c)). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (~between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (~between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (~between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (between(c,a,d)|between(a,d,c))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (X1=X2|~between(X1,X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X1=X2|~equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (between(X1,inner_pasch(X2,X3,X4,X1,X5),X2)|~between(X5,X1,X4)|~between(X2,X3,X4))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (between(X1,inner_pasch(X2,X1,X3,X4,X5),X5)|~between(X5,X4,X3)|~between(X2,X1,X3))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (X1=X2|between(X1,X3,euclid2(X1,X4,X2,X3,X5))|~between(X4,X2,X3)|~between(X1,X2,X5))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X5,X6,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X5,X6,X1,X2))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (X1=X2|between(X3,X4,X5)|between(X4,X5,X3)|between(X5,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X5,X1,X5,X2)|~equidistant(X4,X1,X4,X2)|~equidistant(X3,X1,X3,X2))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (X1=X2|between(X1,X3,euclid1(X1,X3,X2,X4,X5))|~between(X3,X2,X4)|~between(X1,X2,X5))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (X1=X2|between(euclid1(X1,X3,X2,X4,X5),X5,euclid2(X1,X3,X2,X4,X5))|~between(X3,X2,X4)|~between(X1,X2,X5))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X1,continuous(X1,X3,X4,X2,X5,X6))|~between(X3,X2,X5)|~between(X1,X3,X5)|~equidistant(X1,X5,X1,X6)|~equidistant(X1,X3,X1,X4))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (between(X1,continuous(X2,X3,X1,X4,X5,X6),X6)|~between(X3,X4,X5)|~between(X2,X3,X5)|~equidistant(X2,X5,X2,X6)|~equidistant(X2,X3,X2,X1))). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (X1=X2|equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6)|~between(X7,X8,X5)|~between(X1,X2,X3)|~equidistant(X2,X4,X8,X6)|~equidistant(X2,X3,X8,X5)|~equidistant(X1,X4,X7,X6)|~equidistant(X1,X2,X7,X8))). % 0.12/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.12/0.38 # Begin printing tableau % 0.12/0.38 # Found 8 steps % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (between(c,a,d)|between(a,d,c)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (between(c,a,d)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_39])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (c=a), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_42])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (~between(c,a,extension(c,a,X12,X11))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_27])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_78, plain, (between(euclid1(c,c,a,d,extension(c,a,X12,X11)),extension(c,a,X12,X11),euclid2(c,c,a,d,extension(c,a,X12,X11)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_32])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_107, plain, (~between(euclid1(c,c,a,d,extension(c,a,X12,X11)),extension(c,a,X12,X11),euclid2(c,c,a,d,extension(c,a,X12,X11)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_78])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (between(a,d,c)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_48, ...])). % 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_105, plain, (between(extension(c,a,X12,X11),inner_pasch(euclid1(c,c,a,d,extension(c,a,X12,X11)),extension(c,a,X12,X11),euclid2(c,c,a,d,extension(c,a,X12,X11)),extension(c,a,X12,X11),euclid1(c,c,a,d,extension(c,a,X12,X11))),euclid1(c,c,a,d,extension(c,a,X12,X11)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_105, ...])). % 0.12/0.38 # End printing tableau % 0.12/0.38 # SZS output end % 0.12/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.12/0.38 # Child (5359) has found a proof. % 0.12/0.38 % 0.12/0.38 # Proof search is over... % 0.12/0.38 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------