↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : GEO011-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:20:44 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.22s 1.46s
% Output   : Refutation 1.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   6 unt;   3 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   15 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    3 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(lower_dimension3,axiom,
    ~ between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',lower_dimension3) ).

cnf(lower_dimension2,axiom,
    ~ between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',lower_dimension2) ).

cnf(lower_dimension1,axiom,
    ~ between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',lower_dimension1) ).

cnf(prove_lower_dimension_points_not_colinear,negated_conjecture,
    colinear(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_lower_dimension_points_not_colinear) ).

cnf(colinearity4,axiom,
    ( ~ colinear(X263,X265,X264)
    | between(X263,X265,X264)
    | between(X265,X264,X263)
    | between(X264,X263,X265) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-1.ax',colinearity4) ).

cnf(c121,plain,
    ( between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3)
    | between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1)
    | between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[colinearity4,prove_lower_dimension_points_not_colinear]) ).

cnf(c1849,plain,
    ( between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1)
    | between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c121,lower_dimension1]) ).

cnf(c1899,plain,
    between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1849,lower_dimension2]) ).

cnf(c1936,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1899,lower_dimension3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.12  % Problem  : GEO011-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.09/0.12  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime : Thu May  9 08:04:07 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.22/1.46  % Version:  1.5
% 1.22/1.46  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.22/1.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.22/1.46  
% 1.22/1.46  % Initial clauses    : 34
% 1.22/1.46  % Processed clauses  : 169
% 1.22/1.46  % Factors computed   : 61
% 1.22/1.46  % Resolvents computed: 1878
% 1.22/1.46  % Tautologies deleted: 2
% 1.22/1.46  % Forward subsumed   : 275
% 1.22/1.46  % Backward subsumed  : 3
% 1.22/1.46  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 1.22/1.46  % User time          : 1.106 s
% 1.22/1.46  % System time        : 0.019 s
% 1.22/1.46  % Total time         : 1.125 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------