%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO011-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.65s 1.84s
% Output : Refutation 1.65s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO011-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 02:00:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36 Sat Jun 18 02:00:39 2022
% 0.12/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 26776.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36 39 back subsumes 36.
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 43 during input processing: 0 [copy,43,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.69/0.87
% 0.69/0.87 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.69/0.87
% 0.69/0.87 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.69/0.87
% 0.69/0.87
% 0.69/0.87 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.69/0.87
% 0.69/0.87 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.69/0.87 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.69/0.87 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.69/0.87 number of clauses in intial UL: 37
% 0.69/0.87 number of clauses initially in problem: 42
% 0.69/0.87 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 88
% 0.69/0.87 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 91
% 0.69/0.87 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.69/0.87 absolute distinct symbol count: 12
% 0.69/0.87 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.69/0.87 distinct function count: 5
% 0.69/0.87 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.69/0.87
% 0.69/0.87 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.69/0.87
% 0.69/0.87
% 0.69/0.87
% 0.69/0.87 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.69/0.87
% 0.69/0.87 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.69/0.87
% 0.69/0.87 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.65/1.84 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.65/1.84 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 1.46 sec ----> 45 [hyper,42,19,unit_del,7,8,9] {-} $F.
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Length of proof is 0. Level of proof is 0.
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.65/1.84 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.65/1.84 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 7 [] {+} -between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3).
% 1.65/1.84 8 [] {+} -between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1).
% 1.65/1.84 9 [] {+} -between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2).
% 1.65/1.84 19 [] {+} -colinear(A,B,C)|between(A,B,C)|between(B,C,A)|between(C,A,B).
% 1.65/1.84 42 [] {-} colinear(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3).
% 1.65/1.84 45 [hyper,42,19,unit_del,7,8,9] {-} $F.
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.65/1.84 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 ============ end of search ============
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 1.65/1.84 false clauses given 2
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 FALSE TRUE
% 1.65/1.84 3 0 1
% 1.65/1.84 5 0 1
% 1.65/1.84 8 1 0
% 1.65/1.84 9 1 0
% 1.65/1.84 tot: 2 2 (50.0% true)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Process 26776 finished Sat Jun 18 02:00:41 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------