↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : GEO017-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:20:46 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.40s 0.62s
% Output   : Refutation 0.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;  11 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   19 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_symmetry,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equidistant(u,v,x,w),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_symmetry) ).

cnf(reflexivity_for_equidistance,axiom,
    equidistant(X4,X3,X3,X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',reflexivity_for_equidistance) ).

cnf(transitivity_for_equidistance,axiom,
    ( ~ equidistant(X9,X8,X7,X5)
    | ~ equidistant(X9,X8,X10,X6)
    | equidistant(X7,X5,X10,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',transitivity_for_equidistance) ).

cnf(c8,plain,
    ( ~ equidistant(X67,X65,X66,X68)
    | equidistant(X66,X68,X65,X67) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[transitivity_for_equidistance,reflexivity_for_equidistance]) ).

cnf(u_to_v_equals_w_to_x,plain,
    equidistant(u,v,w,x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_to_v_equals_w_to_x) ).

cnf(c35,plain,
    equidistant(w,x,v,u),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c8,u_to_v_equals_w_to_x]) ).

cnf(c42,plain,
    equidistant(v,u,x,w),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c35,c8]) ).

cnf(c45,plain,
    equidistant(x,w,u,v),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c42,c8]) ).

cnf(segment_construction2,axiom,
    equidistant(X26,extension(X27,X26,X25,X24),X25,X24),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',segment_construction2) ).

cnf(c7,plain,
    ( ~ equidistant(X53,X54,X52,X51)
    | equidistant(X52,X51,X52,X51) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[transitivity_for_equidistance]) ).

cnf(c26,plain,
    equidistant(X61,X60,X61,X60),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c7,segment_construction2]) ).

cnf(c31,plain,
    ( ~ equidistant(X108,X107,X110,X109)
    | equidistant(X110,X109,X108,X107) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c26,transitivity_for_equidistance]) ).

cnf(c70,plain,
    equidistant(u,v,x,w),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c31,c45]) ).

cnf(c86,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c70,prove_symmetry]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : GEO017-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.14  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu May  9 08:30:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.40/0.62  % Version:  1.5
% 0.40/0.62  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.40/0.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.40/0.62  
% 0.40/0.62  % Initial clauses    : 30
% 0.40/0.62  % Processed clauses  : 34
% 0.40/0.62  % Factors computed   : 11
% 0.40/0.62  % Resolvents computed: 70
% 0.40/0.62  % Tautologies deleted: 2
% 0.40/0.62  % Forward subsumed   : 13
% 0.40/0.62  % Backward subsumed  : 1
% 0.40/0.62  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.40/0.62  % User time          : 0.252 s
% 0.40/0.62  % System time        : 0.014 s
% 0.40/0.62  % Total time         : 0.266 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------